Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear from the democrats here. Isn’t Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik worse than McCarthy? What is the play from democrats sitting back? To be clear, I don’t think the democrats had the responsibility of saving McCarthy. I just think other options (people) for doing bi-partisan deals are worse. Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik will try to ram down MAGA policies. Sure they won’t get far in the senate. But the one thing that has to get done is the budget. And I see these three nutcases passing so 30% cut to all non-defense agencies.
I agree. I think the House Dems should have tried to make it work longer with McCarthy. The alternatives are way more extreme.
We can’t save you from yourselves.
The Democrats voted in a block with the hard right to oust a moderate Republican speaker. The fallout from that will be felt by everyone, not just the hard right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear from the democrats here. Isn’t Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik worse than McCarthy? What is the play from democrats sitting back? To be clear, I don’t think the democrats had the responsibility of saving McCarthy. I just think other options (people) for doing bi-partisan deals are worse. Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik will try to ram down MAGA policies. Sure they won’t get far in the senate. But the one thing that has to get done is the budget. And I see these three nutcases passing so 30% cut to all non-defense agencies.
I agree. I think the House Dems should have tried to make it work longer with McCarthy. The alternatives are way more extreme.
We can’t save you from yourselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear from the democrats here. Isn’t Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik worse than McCarthy? What is the play from democrats sitting back? To be clear, I don’t think the democrats had the responsibility of saving McCarthy. I just think other options (people) for doing bi-partisan deals are worse. Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik will try to ram down MAGA policies. Sure they won’t get far in the senate. But the one thing that has to get done is the budget. And I see these three nutcases passing so 30% cut to all non-defense agencies.
I agree. I think the House Dems should have tried to make it work longer with McCarthy. The alternatives are way more extreme.
Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear from the democrats here. Isn’t Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik worse than McCarthy? What is the play from democrats sitting back? To be clear, I don’t think the democrats had the responsibility of saving McCarthy. I just think other options (people) for doing bi-partisan deals are worse. Scalise, Jordan and Stefanik will try to ram down MAGA policies. Sure they won’t get far in the senate. But the one thing that has to get done is the budget. And I see these three nutcases passing so 30% cut to all non-defense agencies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would be against house rules for the GOP to nominate Trump for speaker, because he has been indicted for crimes with penalties in excess of 2 years.
It would also be really dumb because he's not a consensus-maker.
Anonymous wrote:It would be against house rules for the GOP to nominate Trump for speaker, because he has been indicted for crimes with penalties in excess of 2 years.
Anonymous wrote:It would be against house rules for the GOP to nominate Trump for speaker, because he has been indicted for crimes with penalties in excess of 2 years.