Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stop driving suvs into parking garages. They aren’t designed for this.

Huh? The SUV’s or the garages?

I’m sure your theory would be amusing to both architects AND automotive engineers, haha.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly because of this:


The fact is that backing into a parking space so that you can pull forward when leaving is actually safer and can help reduce your risks of injuries to yourself and others. The American Automobile Association (AAA) recommends all drivers back into parking spaces whenever possible.

Except I think it is more dangerous getting in. First, you are following someone down the row and then they suddenly stop and start backing into you. Or you are walking to your car and someone again just randomly starts backing into your path.

But this would happen in reverse too! If the car nosed in, upon return then the car has to back out into pedestrians randomly walking by.

AND with less visibility when backing out.

Anyone who thinks it’s safer to pull in needs to start backing in to learn the difference.

If you are parking somewhere turn on your signal.

I have more visibility backing out with a backup camera than driving out forward. Without a camera, visibility is similarly limited both ways, but backing into a space always takes longer than pulling in forward. There are times it’s warranted—concerts, sporting events, and tight parking garages. I always figured people who insist on backing in at places like Target are bad drivers.

You guys always say this, but you always conveniently neglect to make the other appropriate comparison, which is pulling out versus backing out.

Backing into a space takes longer than backing out. Pulling out of a space takes the same amount of time or longer then pulling into a space. So altogether, backing into a space takes longer.

This makes no sense. YOU think it takes longer to back in than back out. MANY people disagree with that presumption. Just because you think it doesn’t make it true.

+1

Probably because PP can't do it.

Anonymous wrote:We lived in a complex with a lot of military. They all backed in. I assumed it was something taught to them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly because of this:


The fact is that backing into a parking space so that you can pull forward when leaving is actually safer and can help reduce your risks of injuries to yourself and others. The American Automobile Association (AAA) recommends all drivers back into parking spaces whenever possible.

Except I think it is more dangerous getting in. First, you are following someone down the row and then they suddenly stop and start backing into you. Or you are walking to your car and someone again just randomly starts backing into your path.

But this would happen in reverse too! If the car nosed in, upon return then the car has to back out into pedestrians randomly walking by.

AND with less visibility when backing out.

Anyone who thinks it’s safer to pull in needs to start backing in to learn the difference.

If you are parking somewhere turn on your signal.

I have more visibility backing out with a backup camera than driving out forward. Without a camera, visibility is similarly limited both ways, but backing into a space always takes longer than pulling in forward. There are times it’s warranted—concerts, sporting events, and tight parking garages. I always figured people who insist on backing in at places like Target are bad drivers.

You guys always say this, but you always conveniently neglect to make the other appropriate comparison, which is pulling out versus backing out.

Backing into a space takes longer than backing out. Pulling out of a space takes the same amount of time or longer then pulling into a space. So altogether, backing into a space takes longer.

This makes no sense. YOU think it takes longer to back in than back out. MANY people disagree with that presumption. Just because you think it doesn’t make it true.

Many people think they can back into a parking space quickly but I’ve never seen it in real life. Maybe you’re a parking unicorn.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly because of this:


The fact is that backing into a parking space so that you can pull forward when leaving is actually safer and can help reduce your risks of injuries to yourself and others. The American Automobile Association (AAA) recommends all drivers back into parking spaces whenever possible.

Except I think it is more dangerous getting in. First, you are following someone down the row and then they suddenly stop and start backing into you. Or you are walking to your car and someone again just randomly starts backing into your path.

But this would happen in reverse too! If the car nosed in, upon return then the car has to back out into pedestrians randomly walking by.

AND with less visibility when backing out.

Anyone who thinks it’s safer to pull in needs to start backing in to learn the difference.

If you are parking somewhere turn on your signal.

I have more visibility backing out with a backup camera than driving out forward. Without a camera, visibility is similarly limited both ways, but backing into a space always takes longer than pulling in forward. There are times it’s warranted—concerts, sporting events, and tight parking garages. I always figured people who insist on backing in at places like Target are bad drivers.

You guys always say this, but you always conveniently neglect to make the other appropriate comparison, which is pulling out versus backing out.

Backing into a space takes longer than backing out. Pulling out of a space takes the same amount of time or longer then pulling into a space. So altogether, backing into a space takes longer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly because of this:


The fact is that backing into a parking space so that you can pull forward when leaving is actually safer and can help reduce your risks of injuries to yourself and others. The American Automobile Association (AAA) recommends all drivers back into parking spaces whenever possible.

Except I think it is more dangerous getting in. First, you are following someone down the row and then they suddenly stop and start backing into you. Or you are walking to your car and someone again just randomly starts backing into your path.

But this would happen in reverse too! If the car nosed in, upon return then the car has to back out into pedestrians randomly walking by.

AND with less visibility when backing out.

Anyone who thinks it’s safer to pull in needs to start backing in to learn the difference.

If you are parking somewhere turn on your signal.

I have more visibility backing out with a backup camera than driving out forward. Without a camera, visibility is similarly limited both ways, but backing into a space always takes longer than pulling in forward. There are times it’s warranted—concerts, sporting events, and tight parking garages. I always figured people who insist on backing in at places like Target are bad drivers.

You guys always say this, but you always conveniently neglect to make the other appropriate comparison, which is pulling out versus backing out.

Backing into a space takes longer than backing out. Pulling out of a space takes the same amount of time or longer then pulling into a space. So altogether, backing into a space takes longer.

This makes no sense. YOU think it takes longer to back in than back out. MANY people disagree with that presumption. Just because you think it doesn’t make it true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always back into parking spaces. However, I will not do so when there is someone behind me as to not slow them down.

This is me, too. I think I’m pretty quick (because the mirrors do make it easy) but I know some people really hate being behind a car backing in.

On the other hand, I hate it when cars that pulled in either 1) speedily back out without regard for other cars already driving in the lane, or 2) back out sooooooo slooooowly.

Anonymous wrote:I always back into parking spaces. However, I will not do so when there is someone behind me as to not slow them down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly because of this:


The fact is that backing into a parking space so that you can pull forward when leaving is actually safer and can help reduce your risks of injuries to yourself and others. The American Automobile Association (AAA) recommends all drivers back into parking spaces whenever possible.

Except I think it is more dangerous getting in. First, you are following someone down the row and then they suddenly stop and start backing into you. Or you are walking to your car and someone again just randomly starts backing into your path.

But this would happen in reverse too! If the car nosed in, upon return then the car has to back out into pedestrians randomly walking by.

AND with less visibility when backing out.

Anyone who thinks it’s safer to pull in needs to start backing in to learn the difference.

If you are parking somewhere turn on your signal.

I have more visibility backing out with a backup camera than driving out forward. Without a camera, visibility is similarly limited both ways, but backing into a space always takes longer than pulling in forward. There are times it’s warranted—concerts, sporting events, and tight parking garages. I always figured people who insist on backing in at places like Target are bad drivers.

You guys always say this, but you always conveniently neglect to make the other appropriate comparison, which is pulling out versus backing out.

Backing into a space takes longer than backing out. Pulling out of a space takes the same amount of time or longer then pulling into a space. So altogether, backing into a space takes longer.

This makes no sense. YOU think it takes longer to back in than back out. MANY people disagree with that presumption. Just because you think it doesn’t make it true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly because of this:


The fact is that backing into a parking space so that you can pull forward when leaving is actually safer and can help reduce your risks of injuries to yourself and others. The American Automobile Association (AAA) recommends all drivers back into parking spaces whenever possible.

Except I think it is more dangerous getting in. First, you are following someone down the row and then they suddenly stop and start backing into you. Or you are walking to your car and someone again just randomly starts backing into your path.

But this would happen in reverse too! If the car nosed in, upon return then the car has to back out into pedestrians randomly walking by.

AND with less visibility when backing out.

Anyone who thinks it’s safer to pull in needs to start backing in to learn the difference.

If you are parking somewhere turn on your signal.

I have more visibility backing out with a backup camera than driving out forward. Without a camera, visibility is similarly limited both ways, but backing into a space always takes longer than pulling in forward. There are times it’s warranted—concerts, sporting events, and tight parking garages. I always figured people who insist on backing in at places like Target are bad drivers.

You guys always say this, but you always conveniently neglect to make the other appropriate comparison, which is pulling out versus backing out.

Backing into a space takes longer than backing out. Pulling out of a space takes the same amount of time or longer then pulling into a space. So altogether, backing into a space takes longer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly because of this:


The fact is that backing into a parking space so that you can pull forward when leaving is actually safer and can help reduce your risks of injuries to yourself and others. The American Automobile Association (AAA) recommends all drivers back into parking spaces whenever possible.

Except I think it is more dangerous getting in. First, you are following someone down the row and then they suddenly stop and start backing into you. Or you are walking to your car and someone again just randomly starts backing into your path.

But this would happen in reverse too! If the car nosed in, upon return then the car has to back out into pedestrians randomly walking by.

AND with less visibility when backing out.

Anyone who thinks it’s safer to pull in needs to start backing in to learn the difference.

If you are parking somewhere turn on your signal.

I have more visibility backing out with a backup camera than driving out forward. Without a camera, visibility is similarly limited both ways, but backing into a space always takes longer than pulling in forward. There are times it’s warranted—concerts, sporting events, and tight parking garages. I always figured people who insist on backing in at places like Target are bad drivers.

You guys always say this, but you always conveniently neglect to make the other appropriate comparison, which is pulling out versus backing out.

Backing into a space takes longer than backing out. Pulling out of a space takes the same amount of time or longer then pulling into a space. So altogether, backing into a space takes longer.

Anonymous wrote:Stop driving suvs into parking garages. They aren’t designed for this.