Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bad move by Garland. Looks like Weiss requested it. He should have denied Weiss’s request and appointed someone else.
Weiss will continue to do nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:70 year old man in poor health arranges for money to go to family members rather than himself. Of course it is his income.
Indeed. The evidence is overwhelming.
And we’re probably seeing only a small fraction.
Thirty years in power is a freggin long time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOJ did not just appoint Weiss as Special Counsel - they ALSO just filed to dismiss the misdemeanors in Delaware, the ONLY pending criminal charges against Hunter.
So this move does three things:
1. Clears existing charges against the First Crackhead.
2. Slows the roll of any prosecution with a reset, which conveniently gives them time to drag further and let the statute of limitations clock run on some more charges.
3. Give Weiss and DOJ in general cover to keep repeating the, "I cannot answer because there is an ongoing investigation," mantra.
The charges were BS...they were only levied BECAUSE he is Hunter Biden. No average American gets charged with what Hunter did here.
If there are any crimes, they will be prosecuted.
Weiss will have to write a report just like Durham and Mueller did...if he ends up not charging anything else, it will be explained in that report.
Bullcrap.
Go to the Whsitleblower thread where someone posted the actual facts of this case as it compares to Hunter Biden to see why the charges and results are different.
Why don't YOU explain how they are different? From what I see, HB's crimes are more severe and his failure to pay amounted to millions, not tens of thousands.
HB paid his taxes. Just late on doing so. And with no evidence of any attempt to deceive or mislead or cheat on them, as opposed to the other guy who DID actively attempt to deceive, mislead and cheat.
You are joking. Or totally ignorant.
He claimed hotel rooms where he met hookers and drug dealers as deductions. He claimed prostitutes as employees:
"He deducted payments that were made to who he called his West Coast assistant, but she was essentially a prostitute. He made payments — there's an $18,000 wire that is made to one of these individuals, and on the wires, they say $8,000 in wage and $10,000 in golf — $10,000 golf club member deposit. And we know that that $10,000 went to pay for a sex club. He went to a sex club — and we've talked to the person that owned that sex club, and they confirmed that he was there. And the [sex club member] has to pay $10,000 ... so that was deducted on the tax return."
Hunter Biden also "deducted expenses for hotel rooms for one of his drug dealers or what we believed to be one of his drug dealers," WB2 added. "There was a significant amount of expenses deducted related to his girlfriend at the time, Airbnbs related to her, hotel rooms. So he deducted a lot for the Chateau Marmont, and he actually was blacklisted and thrown out of the Chateau Marmont. We actually have ... photos of the rooms and the destruction that was done to the rooms."
He also never paid the taxes he owed in 2014 from income from Burisma.
And, HE didn't pay the back taxes. Kevin Morris did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:70 year old man in poor health arranges for money to go to family members rather than himself. Of course it is his income.
Indeed. The evidence is overwhelming.
And we’re probably seeing only a small fraction.
Thirty years in power is a freggin long time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOJ did not just appoint Weiss as Special Counsel - they ALSO just filed to dismiss the misdemeanors in Delaware, the ONLY pending criminal charges against Hunter.
So this move does three things:
1. Clears existing charges against the First Crackhead.
2. Slows the roll of any prosecution with a reset, which conveniently gives them time to drag further and let the statute of limitations clock run on some more charges.
3. Give Weiss and DOJ in general cover to keep repeating the, "I cannot answer because there is an ongoing investigation," mantra.
The charges were BS...they were only levied BECAUSE he is Hunter Biden. No average American gets charged with what Hunter did here.
If there are any crimes, they will be prosecuted.
Weiss will have to write a report just like Durham and Mueller did...if he ends up not charging anything else, it will be explained in that report.
Bullcrap.
Go to the Whsitleblower thread where someone posted the actual facts of this case as it compares to Hunter Biden to see why the charges and results are different.
Why don't YOU explain how they are different? From what I see, HB's crimes are more severe and his failure to pay amounted to millions, not tens of thousands.
HB paid his taxes. Just late on doing so. And with no evidence of any attempt to deceive or mislead or cheat on them, as opposed to the other guy who DID actively attempt to deceive, mislead and cheat.
"He deducted payments that were made to who he called his West Coast assistant, but she was essentially a prostitute. He made payments — there's an $18,000 wire that is made to one of these individuals, and on the wires, they say $8,000 in wage and $10,000 in golf — $10,000 golf club member deposit. And we know that that $10,000 went to pay for a sex club. He went to a sex club — and we've talked to the person that owned that sex club, and they confirmed that he was there. And the [sex club member] has to pay $10,000 ... so that was deducted on the tax return."
Hunter Biden also "deducted expenses for hotel rooms for one of his drug dealers or what we believed to be one of his drug dealers," WB2 added. "There was a significant amount of expenses deducted related to his girlfriend at the time, Airbnbs related to her, hotel rooms. So he deducted a lot for the Chateau Marmont, and he actually was blacklisted and thrown out of the Chateau Marmont. We actually have ... photos of the rooms and the destruction that was done to the rooms."
Anonymous wrote:Bad move by Garland. Looks like Weiss requested it. He should have denied Weiss’s request and appointed someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOJ did not just appoint Weiss as Special Counsel - they ALSO just filed to dismiss the misdemeanors in Delaware, the ONLY pending criminal charges against Hunter.
So this move does three things:
1. Clears existing charges against the First Crackhead.
2. Slows the roll of any prosecution with a reset, which conveniently gives them time to drag further and let the statute of limitations clock run on some more charges.
3. Give Weiss and DOJ in general cover to keep repeating the, "I cannot answer because there is an ongoing investigation," mantra.
The charges were BS...they were only levied BECAUSE he is Hunter Biden. No average American gets charged with what Hunter did here.
If there are any crimes, they will be prosecuted.
Weiss will have to write a report just like Durham and Mueller did...if he ends up not charging anything else, it will be explained in that report.
Bullcrap.
Go to the Whsitleblower thread where someone posted the actual facts of this case as it compares to Hunter Biden to see why the charges and results are different.
Why don't YOU explain how they are different? From what I see, HB's crimes are more severe and his failure to pay amounted to millions, not tens of thousands.
HB paid his taxes. Just late on doing so. And with no evidence of any attempt to deceive or mislead or cheat on them, as opposed to the other guy who DID actively attempt to deceive, mislead and cheat.
All I know is that Donald Trump said and so many of y’all agreed, paying taxes is for fools. Donald Trump doesn’t pay taxes and he was the POTUS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOJ did not just appoint Weiss as Special Counsel - they ALSO just filed to dismiss the misdemeanors in Delaware, the ONLY pending criminal charges against Hunter.
So this move does three things:
1. Clears existing charges against the First Crackhead.
2. Slows the roll of any prosecution with a reset, which conveniently gives them time to drag further and let the statute of limitations clock run on some more charges.
3. Give Weiss and DOJ in general cover to keep repeating the, "I cannot answer because there is an ongoing investigation," mantra.
The charges were BS...they were only levied BECAUSE he is Hunter Biden. No average American gets charged with what Hunter did here.
If there are any crimes, they will be prosecuted.
Weiss will have to write a report just like Durham and Mueller did...if he ends up not charging anything else, it will be explained in that report.
Bullcrap.
Go to the Whsitleblower thread where someone posted the actual facts of this case as it compares to Hunter Biden to see why the charges and results are different.
Why don't YOU explain how they are different? From what I see, HB's crimes are more severe and his failure to pay amounted to millions, not tens of thousands.
HB paid his taxes. Just late on doing so. And with no evidence of any attempt to deceive or mislead or cheat on them, as opposed to the other guy who DID actively attempt to deceive, mislead and cheat.
Anonymous wrote:70 year old man in poor health arranges for money to go to family members rather than himself. Of course it is his income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Zeigler doesn't understand that that a lot of those monies were investments, not "income to Hunter Biden" - and then "we" wonder why HE thinks Biden should be prosecuted but the prosecutors don't.
Astounding. Ziegler seems incompetent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:70 year old man in poor health arranges for money to go to family members rather than himself. Of course it is his income.
This is all in your head— no evidence at all. Probably more evidence to use ivermectin
Anonymous wrote:70 year old man in poor health arranges for money to go to family members rather than himself. Of course it is his income.
Anonymous wrote:70 year old man in poor health arranges for money to go to family members rather than himself. Of course it is his income.