Anonymous wrote:What do you dorks get paid to shill for this creep?

They are both off their rockers. The sooner they both go away the better off we will be. In the link someone posted about the texts she was telling him to be sure to tell the new person he was seeing all about her. Like, what? That's not how it works. These people both just sound so awful and neither deserves defending.

What do you dorks get paid to shill for this creep?

Anonymous wrote:The only person I feel bad for is Hill's baby mama - gave birth to a kid 5 weeks ago, sleeping poorly, hormonal, likely still physically healing from the birth itself.

And then she needs to deal with all this drama. It's enough to drive a post-partum woman nuts.

The sick part is Sarah thought she was being helpful with the timing so that the new mom could make an informed decision. Yeah, right. What kind of person does this? She should be hoping for the best for them, for the sake of the new baby. It's just a very self-centered vindictive thing to do for her own benefit, not for anyone else's.

The only person I feel bad for is Hill's baby mama - gave birth to a kid 5 weeks ago, sleeping poorly, hormonal, likely still physically healing from the birth itself.

And then she needs to deal with all this drama. It's enough to drive a post-partum woman nuts.

Anonymous wrote:The pig was sexting other women while impregnating his current girlfriend. What a male feminist!

https://pagesix.com/2023/07/11/sarah-brady-jonah-hill-was-sexting-me-before-olivia-millar/

Doesn't really sound that way. She was probably impregnated around October and this conversation is from August? It even says "before" new romance and he acknowledges he starting seeing someone. All this says is that both these people are awfully messy but this isn't the smoking gun you're making it out to be.

The pig was sexting other women while impregnating his current girlfriend. What a male feminist!

https://pagesix.com/2023/07/11/sarah-brady-jonah-hill-was-sexting-me-before-olivia-millar/

Anonymous wrote:He is using therapy speak to justify controlling and demeaning behavior. It’s not necessarily classic abuse, but it’s all kinds of f***ed up and dysfunctional, and I imagine he’s unaware of his own profound a$$holery.

The lack of awareness is what drives me nuts. I had a boss like this. She had been in therapy for years and had fully acclimated to the language and tone of therapy, but had a raging personality disorder and just used all that therapy speak to manipulate and abuse her family, friends, and everyone in our office. I wound up going to therapy after leaving that job for a bit, and after talking about that boss with my therapist, she send me an article about how certain personality disorders can be dangerous in group therapy settings because they learn to manipulate the language of therapy to control the group. Different from what I experienced, but it was an eye opening read. I'll see if I can find it and post it here -- definitely relevant to this conversation.

He is using therapy speak to justify controlling and demeaning behavior. It’s not necessarily classic abuse, but it’s all kinds of f***ed up and dysfunctional, and I imagine he’s unaware of his own profound a$$holery.

Bro needs to step away from therapy. Who talks like that?

He’s a 5’7 little worm, likely with a tiny p*nis. He needs to control women to feel good about himself. Not even for 100 million dollars would I want to look at his saggy ozempic naked body.

I don't think this is a #metoo situation at all -- just a crappy boyfriend misusing therapy terms to try and get his girlfriend to do what he wanted. I think the texts make me not want to date Jonah Hill, but that wasn't really on the table for me, so oh well.

However, I do think the conversation around this dynamic in relationships has been interesting. I've never been in a romantic relationship like this, but I have had friendships that played out this way. Like people who developed friendships with me (very much from their initiative) and were initially very positive towards me, and then suddenly were trying to tell me that the way I live my life (and lived my life before I even knew them) is incorrect and that I need to change certain behaviors in order to keep their friendship. I can look at it objectively now and see that it was definitely just them trying to exercise control over me and maybe trying to force me to become the kind of person they wanted to be friends with instead of accepting me as I am, but at the time I remember feeling so hurt because it's a terrible feeling to feel like your friends don't really seem to like you? In the end I was able to just walk away, which is easier to do with a friendship than a romantic relationship. But I had a lot of bad feelings from those experiences and thinking about this Jonah Hill situation has helped put it in perspective for me.

In the end I think it comes down to entitlement -- the belief that other people should change to meet your needs, and also the belief that you are even in a position to give another person "feedback" on how to live. I think these are really common attitudes, unfortunately, and that's why a lot of people are identifying with this dynamic. It just feels bad to have someone decide they need you to "fix" yourself in order to earn their love or friendships, especially when who you are was good enough for them to be interested in you initially.

Anonymous wrote:Do people think he's still a fat little kid? This is a famous 40 YEAR OLD MAN worth $100 million dollars sending this psychotic texts to a MUCH younger non-celeb woman he just started dating. While gaslighting her that he's the "perfect" boyfriend and a male feminist. The guy was OBVIOUSLY preying on her being young and dumb. He would never send such texts or make such demands on any woman his age.

25 is not young and dumb

He's a manipulative pig.

Anonymous wrote:Do people think he's still a fat little kid? This is a famous 40 YEAR OLD MAN worth $100 million dollars sending this psychotic texts to a MUCH younger non-celeb woman he just started dating. While gaslighting her that he's the "perfect" boyfriend and a male feminist. The guy was OBVIOUSLY preying on her being young and dumb. He would never send such texts or make such demands on any woman his age.

Of course he would. This is who he is. But that doesn't mean all women in their 20s are naive fools who would tolerate this.

Do people think he's still a fat little kid? This is a famous 40 YEAR OLD MAN worth $100 million dollars sending this psychotic texts to a MUCH younger non-celeb woman he just started dating. While gaslighting her that he's the "perfect" boyfriend and a male feminist. The guy was OBVIOUSLY preying on her being young and dumb. He would never send such texts or make such demands on any woman his age.