Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:44 and 47
$1.25M 401ks
$170K brokerage
$150K savings
$350K 529s (for three kids, so still saving to do)
$300K home equity (home paid off ~ 14 years)
Dual-earner HHI of around $320K
After 25 years of full-time work and now with three kids, I would love to scale back, but not possible or practical yet! Right now, our goal is for one of us to retire by mid to late 50s and the other early 60s, but we will see how things go.
A man not working in late 50s is unemployed. They usually die within a few years. 100 percent of my uncles who retired early 59-62 dropped dead by 70. My uncles who worked till 70 all are alive and between 86-93.
Men don’t do well retiring early.
Really? Tell my husband that. He didn’t get that memo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:44 and 47
$1.25M 401ks
$170K brokerage
$150K savings
$350K 529s (for three kids, so still saving to do)
$300K home equity (home paid off ~ 14 years)
Dual-earner HHI of around $320K
After 25 years of full-time work and now with three kids, I would love to scale back, but not possible or practical yet! Right now, our goal is for one of us to retire by mid to late 50s and the other early 60s, but we will see how things go.
A man not working in late 50s is unemployed. They usually die within a few years. 100 percent of my uncles who retired early 59-62 dropped dead by 70. My uncles who worked till 70 all are alive and between 86-93.
Men don’t do well retiring early.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why???Anonymous wrote:This is a very depressing thread.
Because these figures are eye popping to average Americans??
-dp
If you are well educated and ambitious you should not compare yourself with the “average” anything. You should compare yourself with people in your social class. Relative to our peers and college friends, I feel behind with $5mm at 49. Kids are young and house is not paid off, so yah, dh and I have underachieved so far given our potential.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why???Anonymous wrote:This is a very depressing thread.
Because these figures are eye popping to average Americans??
-dp
If you are well educated and ambitious you should not compare yourself with the “average” anything. You should compare yourself with people in your social class. Relative to our peers and college friends, I feel behind with $5mm at 49. Kids are young and house is not paid off, so yah, dh and I have underachieved so far given our potential.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why???Anonymous wrote:This is a very depressing thread.
Because these figures are eye popping to average Americans??
-dp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ages 49/48
$1M tax-deferred
$600k Roth
$750k home equity (paid off townhome)
$175k college (one kid)
SS estimate for both of us $4,500/mo.
It is really odd seeing so many posters like PP above who have nothing saved outside of tax advantaged vehicles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:About 650k and I'm 54 years old. Will have my house paid for by the time I retire.
I know I'm poor by DCUM standards but I'll be fine.
You're rich by normal standards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll share to make everyone else feel better
Not quite 50, but:
Me, 300k tsp
Wife, 230k 401k
100k brokerage
100k savings
Gonna work til we die.
What's your story?
Anonymous wrote:$5M and it is a nightmare
Anonymous wrote:I'll share to make everyone else feel better
Not quite 50, but:
Me, 300k tsp
Wife, 230k 401k
100k brokerage
100k savings
Gonna work til we die.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:44 and 47
$1.25M 401ks
$170K brokerage
$150K savings
$350K 529s (for three kids, so still saving to do)
$300K home equity (home paid off ~ 14 years)
Dual-earner HHI of around $320K
After 25 years of full-time work and now with three kids, I would love to scale back, but not possible or practical yet! Right now, our goal is for one of us to retire by mid to late 50s and the other early 60s, but we will see how things go.
A man not working in late 50s is unemployed. They usually die within a few years. 100 percent of my uncles who retired early 59-62 dropped dead by 70. My uncles who worked till 70 all are alive and between 86-93.
Men don’t do well retiring early.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:44 and 47
$1.25M 401ks
$170K brokerage
$150K savings
$350K 529s (for three kids, so still saving to do)
$300K home equity (home paid off ~ 14 years)
Dual-earner HHI of around $320K
After 25 years of full-time work and now with three kids, I would love to scale back, but not possible or practical yet! Right now, our goal is for one of us to retire by mid to late 50s and the other early 60s, but we will see how things go.
A man not working in late 50s is unemployed. They usually die within a few years. 100 percent of my uncles who retired early 59-62 dropped dead by 70. My uncles who worked till 70 all are alive and between 86-93.
I don't know PP. I wouldn't call that living.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:44 and 47
$1.25M 401ks
$170K brokerage
$150K savings
$350K 529s (for three kids, so still saving to do)
$300K home equity (home paid off ~ 14 years)
Dual-earner HHI of around $320K
After 25 years of full-time work and now with three kids, I would love to scale back, but not possible or practical yet! Right now, our goal is for one of us to retire by mid to late 50s and the other early 60s, but we will see how things go.
A man not working in late 50s is unemployed. They usually die within a few years. 100 percent of my uncles who retired early 59-62 dropped dead by 70. My uncles who worked till 70 all are alive and between 86-93.
+1 IK,R? Working after 55 is something you do only because you have to, not because you want to. All the other BS about dropping dead, men get bored, etc. is just crazy talk cooked up by phDs who couldn't find a better topic to right about.. It's not like anyone's going to care to dispute their findings! What's in it for them?
Men don’t do well retiring early.
I don't know PP. I wouldn't call that living.