Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

He’s like a low-rent Snowden. Except he wasn’t making that big contractor money.

What’s shocking is that flags were not auto-triggered when an IT tech in the national guard was accessing & printing these files. The content in these documents have nothing to do with his job. And why do SCIFs have printers?!? That’s gotta go too.

Anonymous wrote:He's just a dumb kid who grew up online - the online world and his online friends are more real to him to the real world. So he's now going to spend the rest of his life in SuperMax because he stole and posted highly-classified documents to boost his edgelord persona.

We have a crisis in young men who live in the online world. This guy is a victim of that.

It’s just the world, online, not online, we have a problem with lonely boys and men who need their egos stroked.

Anonymous wrote:He's just a dumb kid who grew up online - the online world and his online friends are more real to him to the real world. So he's now going to spend the rest of his life in SuperMax because he stole and posted highly-classified documents to boost his edgelord persona.

We have a crisis in young men who live in the online world. This guy is a victim of that.

He's a selfish mamma's boy and I hope he loves prison.

Anonymous wrote:Why does the government get to classify spying on allies and its involvement in proxy wars?

This is a far cry from spying on a country we declared war on.

He stole classified documents and posted them online for all comers to examine. It isn't spying. It is worse.

NYT is reporting that Teixeira's mother's home is being searched by Federal agents now.

Anonymous wrote:Why does the government get to classify spying on allies and its involvement in proxy wars?

This is a far cry from spying on a country we declared war on.

Ok, OG. You've got bigger fish to fry right now than pondering pointless existential questions. Better lawyer up

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

How does that explain it?

Why does the government get to classify spying on allies and its involvement in proxy wars?

This is a far cry from spying on a country we declared war on.

The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

Hope he enjoys Fort Leavenworth. Or ADX Florence with Robert Hanssen!

Anonymous wrote:He’s from Massachusetts?!?!?!??

One of the bluest states in the country?

How does air national guard have access to this stuff?

Last name — not a DAR type American

Very odd this whole episode

His last name is Portuguese. There's a huge Portuguese community which immigrated generations ago in that part of New England. Please tell us more about how you nothing about Massachusetts.

Well, this young kid FAAFO and likely ruined the next 45-65 years of his life.

He's a kid. A stupid 21-year-old kid who probably still lives at home with Mom. He's a "Christian" fan of guns and body armor and war games and racist memes. And this is who is allowed access to classified information. Might as well have Beavis and Butthead running our national security. Idiocracy - it's not just a movie, It's a documentary, and Mike Judge is a prophet.

[/img]https://static01.nyt.com/images/2023/04/13/multimedia/13leak-add-qmzp/13leak-add-qmzp-superJumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp[img]

He's just a dumb kid who grew up online - the online world and his online friends are more real to him to the real world. So he's now going to spend the rest of his life in SuperMax because he stole and posted highly-classified documents to boost his edgelord persona.

We have a crisis in young men who live in the online world. This guy is a victim of that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.

❌❌❌
He’s a “young, charismatic gun enthusiast.”

+1

Washington Post reporters got hold of members of the Discord channel where the leaks were posted, they know the poster, and said he is in his 20s, currently serving in the military, conservative, gun enthusiast, and he got the documents from a military base that he serves on. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/12/discord-leaked-documents/

Will probably get caught very soon.

Where in the posted article did they say he was "conservative?" Or, serving in the military? Citation needed.

Literally the first lines of the linked article. Jesus.

Copy and paste them here.

Here's a gift link to the article - https://wapo.st/400q5B6

The teen who gave the interview in the article is in a world of hurt. I hope he gets a lawyer.

Copy and past the part where pp here claimed he is "conservative" and "serving in the military."

DP here
“But OG had a dark view of the government. The young member said he spoke of the United States, and particularly law enforcement and the intelligence community, as a sinister force that sought to suppress its citizens and keep them in the dark. He ranted about “government overreach.”

Sure sounds like a liberal to me!! Nothing specific about being actual military but he clearly was a gun nutter conservative that worked at a secure military location.

"Gun-nutters" are not just conservatives.
The Kentucky killer pretty much put that idea to rest.

Is it conservatives or liberals who are anti government overreach and into chatting about guns and god? Don’t play dumb, we’re all smart people here.

As a pp said, sounds much more like a libertarian.

He could well be conservative. But, the poster above that was citing the WaPo article made some huge assumptions and stated false claims saying it was in the article.
If you are going to post information, be accurate. Because we can all read. I can only think she assumed people wouldn't actually check her information.