Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you hoping there are? If so you’re a terrible human.
But probably not. Unless you are willing to adopt a non-white baby, and then only maybe. It’s probably likely that more children will grow up in poverty.
+1000
Unfortunately there will also be in an increase in mortality for pregnant woman and their fetuses, as desperation increases.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
At the stage at which most abortions happen, the fetuses are morphologically *primarily* “tiny little women.” I know this drives people like you nuts for other reasons, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
Anonymous wrote:
I’ve never felt a chill like I felt reading what Amy C-B said about how the existence of adoption means it’s fine to force women to have children.
As the daughter of a woman who was forced to relinquish a baby for adoption during the Baby Scoop era, I agree…she’s basically advocating forced birth for human trafficking. An underclass of breeders, like the Hamdmaid’s Tale, with no concern for the health, lives, or trauma endured by the women forced to carry pregnancies they don’t choose.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never felt a chill like I felt reading what Amy C-B said about how the existence of adoption means it’s fine to force women to have children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
There are a lot of women in subsaharan Africa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
The countries that are most successful on every measure have 1-2 kid families at most.
Please define your idea of success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
I don’t care about having more warm bodies. The number of people isn’t relevant. The number of people with a high quality of life, is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
The countries that are most successful on every measure have 1-2 kid families at most.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. There will be more dead women and more abused and neglected children and more poverty and more violence in the world long-term. F the right.
How many MORE women would there be if not for rampant abortions?
People who care about women, actually care about women, even when they’re tiny little beings, not yet born. How many have been snuffed?