Anonymous wrote:Okay so, I guess the two students involved in the sexual incident are BOTH still going to Oakridge? I feel horrible talking about minors like this but is APS really making a victim of assault stay in the same school as their assailant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The PP is referring to the OL incident.
And of course, that could NEVER happen with white UMC kids. (sarcasm)
Do we know the backgrounds of the kids involved? There ARE white UMC kids at Gunston, you know; it's not all FRL/ELL/students of color.
Anonymous wrote:The PP is referring to the OL incident.
And of course, that could NEVER happen with white UMC kids. (sarcasm)
Anonymous wrote:Some CAN be faulted. There was a sexual incident involving 2 boys
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A post was removed. The PP said that the tears were due to a specific group of kids. If
that’s the case, then the situation is not being well managed. Which brings us back to the title of this thread.
Ugh. Can you say what the post said in a way that wouldn’t violate Jeff’s rules?
Anonymous wrote:A post was removed. The PP said that the tears were due to a specific group of kids. If
that’s the case, then the situation is not being well managed. Which brings us back to the title of this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is still in PK, but we are zoned for Oakridge for K. I’ve heard many people say the principal is horrible. Is this true?
Run as fast as you can. You missed the option school deadline but perhaps you can buy or if that’s not feasible rent somewhere else. My friends kids are in Oakridge and she literally is crying when she tells me about what’s going on in the school.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is still in PK, but we are zoned for Oakridge for K. I’ve heard many people say the principal is horrible. Is this true?