Anonymous wrote:Also, everyone pretending confusion re: fiancée and fiancé in the guise of being open minding but really being pedantic can see yourselves out…
OP’s child is a woman marrying a man (pronouns in the OP’s post make it clear).
If you’re going to be unreasonably, but on-brand, snobby, question how OP’s future SIL a could be going to a top rated MBA program straight out of undergrad (hint - it’s probably actually law school or some other sort of expensive grad school).
Anonymous wrote:BG: our DD and her fiancée are both seniors in college and recently got engaged. DD is accepted into medical school and the fiancée into a top MBA school. Neither has debt from college. We will pay for DD medical school and his parents will pay for MBA school. Both families are well off with family all in the US.
The fiancée’s parents are going to traditional route and want us to pay for our DD’s wedding. While we can, we also have a second DD and their’s is an only child. We also feel we are keeping the young couple out of debt (but so are they). I want to suggest we split the costs but I don’t want to offend them.
DS says he and the fiancée will contribute but they don’t have much to contribute and we don’t want them to.
The fiancée doesn’t want a fancy wedding but we both have big families.
Should we ask the fiancée’s parents to contribute? How should we word it?
We are fairly wealthy. I just don’t want to attract gold diggers for my sons. I wouldn’t want to give the future DIL an open check to plan whatever she wants. I assume the bride will be planning the wedding, not my sons.
Given that my kids are in elementary and middle school, this is not something I have to deal with for a very long time. My daughter is only 5.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My cousin just had a courthouse wedding with immediate family. They still dressed up and got married at a really lovely historic courthouse.
I would disown my child for having a courthouse wedding. Nothing represents a greater affront to the dignity of family heritage and generational expectation.
Anonymous wrote:Three of our five are married. We told them a long time ago exactly what we could contribute to their weddings. Didn’t matter bride or groom. They all got exactly the same amount. They could choose to spend however they wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Three of our five are married. We told them a long time ago exactly what we could contribute to their weddings. Didn’t matter bride or groom. They all got exactly the same amount. They could choose to spend however they wanted.
Anonymous wrote:It’s traditional that the groom’s family pay for FLOP- flowers, liquor , orchestra and photographer. They’re not willing to pay for any?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d be curious about the justification in 2023 for the argument that the bride’s family should pay for the wedding.
I am as liberal and feminist as they come. I did not change my name after marriage etc.
BUT I have always wondered this- why is it that some traditions are not ok and (I agree) antiquated...like only bride's family paying for wedding-
but others are embraced....like an engagement ring.
Anonymous wrote:I change my answer. I have 2 boys and a daughter. I would want my daughter to have a dream wedding and no problem paying for it. I would want to go all out and be part of planning.
If my sons were getting married, I would not just foot the bill. If the girl was wealthy, they could pay for it. I would give for down payment on a house.