Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side note - the boy was wearing a skirt. A few students who knew him will tell you he did not identify as gender fluid, it was just something that was done as a distraction.

This.
Too many people too focused on trying to identify him as trans or gender fluid, when there is absolutely no evidence that was the case. It just serves as a political flashpoint to generate headlines and conservative outrage.
I went to high school in the 90s. A boy in my graduating class used to show up to school in a kilt on occasion. Not a Scot, not trans or gender fluid…just did it to get a response and attention.
I don’t care what he was wearing. I care that he raped 2 girls.

I wish this was highlighted more. The only people who mention gender-fluid are national media when talking about LCPS. The actually people who went to school with the rapist, his teachers, his family - never claimed that.

Its to distract from the fact that this boy belongs in prison.

Anonymous wrote:Side note - the boy was wearing a skirt. A few students who knew him will tell you he did not identify as gender fluid, it was just something that was done as a distraction.

This.
Too many people too focused on trying to identify him as trans or gender fluid, when there is absolutely no evidence that was the case. It just serves as a political flashpoint to generate headlines and conservative outrage.
I went to high school in the 90s. A boy in my graduating class used to show up to school in a kilt on occasion. Not a Scot, not trans or gender fluid…just did it to get a response and attention.
I don’t care what he was wearing. I care that he raped 2 girls.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will the public be privy to how Byard perjured himself?

I’m very curious. It has to be an intentional, material misrepresentation. What would that be?

Wouldn’t the indictment be public record?

So far what I’ve seen that’s posted publicly has no specific detail, just the indictment charges. I would like to know more.

The indictments would be in the court records. Just need someone with case access to look them up. Or go to the courthouse and request copies.

Anonymous wrote:In reading this report, why hasn't the SBHS principal been fired?

Both Principals. I'm beginning to doubt LCPS' ability to keep our kids safe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was an email sent by a TA that raised concerns over student behaviors that she/he saw. The dept. chair claims to be confused and thought it could just be that the TA was afraid of Covid and illness. But didn’t care enough to clarify. Informed the case manager who also didn’t talk to the TA to ask any questions. The AP says it’s just a classroom management problem, but didn’t offer to do help or do anything. I guess the lowly paid assistant was supposed to handle all that.

It’s commonplace for admins to throw teachers and assistants under the bus and ignore problems. In my experience, I have met very very few admins who actually cared about their employees. But what is shocking to me is that the TA was ignored by other teachers. Teachers - who are also low paid, and constantly disrespected by admins, students and parents - didn’t care about the fellow TA’s concerns at all. They brushed it off. No one even offered to give the TA support, or to even tell them to talk to a counselor who could talk to the student, anything. They did nothing for another staff member who was low on the totem pole like they are.

As far as the administrators - what did they know about the previous issues? I assume the principal at least would know what was going on. No one warned the teachers or TAs involved? They just threw the student in their classes without any guidance? That’s not surprising at all. Because they don’t have to deal with the student, they don’t care. How can any teacher or TA continue to work for these people? These admins who knowingly put them in a horrible situation without warning while they themselves are armed with way more information and knowledge about the danger that is walking around in their school.

Also, who was the person who got fired? Was it the TA? Another teacher? Admin?

The person who got fired and the reason Ziegler has misdemeanor charges has nothing to do with the stone bridge assault case. A teacher at Rosa Lee Carter elementary reported that a disabled 5th grader had groped her multiple times. When nothing was done she spoke at the school board meeting about it. She was later reprimanded and fired. For that reason, Ziegler was charged with retaliation and intimidation. That teacher currently has a suit against him/LCPS/her former principal.

So as employees we have learned you’re damned if you do report student concerns and damned if you don’t. Nothing will be done about it either but somehow if something ends up happening with that student, it’ll end up coming back on us. Good to know.

And that is why he will be exonerated. She wasn’t fired in retaliation. She was fired for violating student privacy rights.

Agree. These are such weak charges. I think the entire case will fall apart in an embarrassing way. The superintendent may have made serious mistakes and shown poor leadership under the circumstances, but not seeing the basis for criminal prosecution here. It just seems like a politically motivated attack on a school system the administration was already targeting. And highly suspicious that no law enforcement is being held accountable for their role.

Endangering the well being of minor in their charge. That's why.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so what are schools supposed to do with kids like this, whose own mother and grandmother warned the school about?

and when does this known sociopath get released?

Kids like this? you mean rapists?

My daughter goes to stone bridge, the "kid" should have been arrested after the first rape. No alternative school no "special needs" situation.

Jail then prison.

100%

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Testimony at the school board meeting that there is no record of sexual assaults in the restrooms.
This was called a lie by another witness.
There is record of a sexual assault. Not sexual assaults plural.

OP here.

There are two assaults. One at one school the other after the boy was transferred he was convicted in a court of law. None of that is in dispute.

This investigates more the actions of LCPS.

Sorry, my grammar got away from me there.

Assault 1 was in May. Assault 2 was in September. Different schools.

The second one was not in a restroom.

right - that's what the doc said.

In reading this report, why hasn't the SBHS principal been fired?

Side note - the boy was wearing a skirt. A few students who knew him will tell you he did not identify as gender fluid, it was just something that was done as a distraction.

Anonymous wrote:Still have no idea what Byard allegedly perjured himself about. Makes no sense to me. That man had no reason or benefit to lie intentionally. He wasn’t involved in any of the incidents, he’s simply a PIO. It’s so unfortunate how this entire situation has become so politically entrenched that you can’t tell what was legitimately handled poorly and what is simply part of a political operation because conservatives target Loudoun and found the perfect opportunity to exploit. And meanwhile nothing at all coming down on LCSO.

Agree - Ziegler, yeah - that guy should be fired. But can someone tell me what Byard did?

Anonymous wrote:so what are schools supposed to do with kids like this, whose own mother and grandmother warned the school about?

and when does this known sociopath get released?

Kids like this? you mean rapists?

My daughter goes to stone bridge, the "kid" should have been arrested after the first rape. No alternative school no "special needs" situation.

Jail then prison.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will the public be privy to how Byard perjured himself?

I’m very curious. It has to be an intentional, material misrepresentation. What would that be?

Wouldn’t the indictment be public record?

So far what I’ve seen that’s posted publicly has no specific detail, just the indictment charges. I would like to know more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure these criminal charges will stick. And the public information officer charged with perjury? It seems very politically motivated by Youngkin/Miyares. Guess we’ll see.

Agree. And will make the next guy's job that much harder (and finding him/her).

Between attacks on teachers and now criminal charges against school administrators, who on earth would want to work in the VA public education system right now? It’s all part of Youngkin’s strategy to dismantle public schools and privatize education.

Well hopefully it keeps out the people who want to take a laissez faire approach to students with sexual assault charges. Maybe we can get back to admins that take it seriously when teachers or parents report dangerous behavior.

he

There was no laissez faire approach. Pure lies the rwnjs keep trying to push. Even the sro didn't think there was anything valid. She'd been having sex with the kid on the regular in the bathroom. The super could not say anything about the issue. He was in a difficult situation. You jerks have taken advantage of the difficult situation, just like you tried to villainize Fauci, to destroy the administration that seemed too liberal for you. This super is 100% a scapegoat.

Ewww. It is always the victim's fault right??? Her skirt was too short? Consent to v means consent to a, right??? Consent to s&x means consent to asphyxiation, right? How about consent to s$x means consent to a punch??? I hope you do not have children, as it is these attitudes that lead to s@x assault because your sons do not know when to stop.

If you want to have a conversation about stopping sexual assault in schools, I will have it.

Be warned that that conversation will spend a lot of time about how transgender people are frequently the victims of it. It will also involve a close examination of the culture our cis-gender boys absorb and probably involve training for boys to stop them from being so predatory all the time.

Shall we have that conversation?

NP. All this because you are upset that IN THIS CASE the girl was raped by a kid who was also gender fluid. Stop with the generalities that you want to use to dilute what happened to these girls. Groupthink is going to be the damn death of civility.

Anonymous wrote:Still have no idea what Byard allegedly perjured himself about. Makes no sense to me. That man had no reason or benefit to lie intentionally. He wasn’t involved in any of the incidents, he’s simply a PIO. It’s so unfortunate how this entire situation has become so politically entrenched that you can’t tell what was legitimately handled poorly and what is simply part of a political operation because conservatives target Loudoun and found the perfect opportunity to exploit. And meanwhile nothing at all coming down on LCSO.

The report claimed that the lawyer for the county intimidated everyone they represented. I believe it is just 1 lawyer who represented all the people on the LCPS side. It is not farfetched to believe that the PIO may have been intimidated into saying things by their legal representatives or even Ziegler himself. He has no reason to lie, but when you’re being spoken down to by your superiors, you may do things that you don’t really want to.

I remember reading a line in the report about Ziegler intimidating a subordinate administrator about something. The term “alpha-dogged” was used to by the subordinate to describe how Ziegler acted towards him. Don’t remember what the incident was about.

Then there was the incident of the 2 board members who was subpoenaed, and didn’t show up. When they were told they had 2 hours to arrive or be arrested, they immediately showed ups and stated that the lawyers told them to not show up.

All of this goes to show that even well educated people in high positions can do odd things that make no sense when they are being intimidated. Why did the PIO have to lie when he wasn’t even involved? Why did the 2 board members not show up even though they had nothing to do with the incidents? What are they afraid of? Did they really believe their lawyer’s words that they didn’t have to show up to court even if they got a subpoena? They think they can just ignore it and it will go away? They didn’t even google, “do I have to show up in court if I got a subpoena?” None of it makes any sense.

What do they have to hide? And why would a lawyer tells the clients to not show up to court when they been ordered to do so? What is the lawyer’s motive? To get the board members arrested??

Then there was a statement about the teachers who were also represented by the county lawyer. Apparently one teacher felt pressured into being represented by the county lawyer. She was not represented by him. But he claimed that he is representing her. She said he tried to shut her up and she was told not to cooperate. I’m surprised she could withstand that level of intimidation.

So it doesn’t surprise me at all if the PIO was told to say something that may be untrue even though it doesn’t benefit him at all. Because the goal could be not to benefit him but to benefit LCPS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still have no idea what Byard allegedly perjured himself about. Makes no sense to me. That man had no reason or benefit to lie intentionally. He wasn’t involved in any of the incidents, he’s simply a PIO. It’s so unfortunate how this entire situation has become so politically entrenched that you can’t tell what was legitimately handled poorly and what is simply part of a political operation because conservatives target Loudoun and found the perfect opportunity to exploit. And meanwhile nothing at all coming down on LCSO.

Maybe it’s for that one time when he said school was out because weather and then it didn’t snow.

Two members of the board were nearly arrested for blatantly ignoring the grand jury subpoena. How is it a surprise that someone involved in this mess ended up under indictment?

Which members?