Anonymous
12/20/2022 11:35
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:
Loving the whole bracelet situation here:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmUZJcwpGFc/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Yuck. Horrid.
Anonymous
12/20/2022 10:55
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Loving the whole bracelet situation here:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmUZJcwpGFc/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Anonymous
12/19/2022 12:23
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:
Yuck ill-fitting and that jacket yuck
+2 the jacket looks horrid on her. Too small and hits in all the wrong places.
Anonymous
12/19/2022 10:56
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was also one of the top iconic models of her time, why wouldn't she look beautiful at 55?
She's also had access to the best skincare, best quality foods, and best quality of life in comparison to 99.9999999% of the rest of the world. So she is not a fair comparison.
And has done plastic surgery, early and in teeny increments to keep it look natural and not plastic. There was an article on this a few years ago. This is nto her aging "naturally."
Grece looks totally natural. Kidman, too.
She isn’t. Botox and recently a lower face lift and fillers are making her look uncanny valley.
Grece or Nicole?
Anonymous
12/19/2022 10:52
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was also one of the top iconic models of her time, why wouldn't she look beautiful at 55?
She's also had access to the best skincare, best quality foods, and best quality of life in comparison to 99.9999999% of the rest of the world. So she is not a fair comparison.
And has done plastic surgery, early and in teeny increments to keep it look natural and not plastic. There was an article on this a few years ago. This is nto her aging "naturally."
Grece looks totally natural. Kidman, too.
She isn’t. Botox and recently a lower face lift and fillers are making her look uncanny valley.
Anonymous
12/19/2022 10:22
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yuck ill-fitting and that jacket yuck
Dear GOD that is awful
It’s fashionable but very conservative. It’s probably appropriate for her.
Anonymous
12/19/2022 10:15
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:
Yuck ill-fitting and that jacket yuck
Dear GOD that is awful
Anonymous
12/15/2022 16:13
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Yuck ill-fitting and that jacket yuck
Anonymous
12/15/2022 16:10
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
I’ve hardly call Nicole “heavily wrinkled”!
DP. I think what's aging about the NK video is that she's hobbled herself with sunglasses and presumably high heels inside long hemmed pants. They have someone stationed at that door, because the stoop is a hazard, but getting an assist makes her look geriatric. Then she has to raise her glasses to avoid some other issue.
Do you mean if the jeans are going to be hemmed, then why not have them hemmed just a bit more? Also, different classes would’ve been an obvious better choice..
Maybe, or just it's not possible to trust your feet if you're wearing some sort of heels hidden inside giant pant legs. She's right to be cautious, but it looks terrible on camera in a way that wouldn't if a twentysomething did it. But your comment brings this to mind: https://dcist.com/story/09/08/21/diane-rehm-injured-in-freak-acciden/ Anyway, it's not simply fashion victim, NK is literally hobbled by both choices.
Anonymous
12/15/2022 14:27
Subject: High Fashion in your 50s
Mae musk is high fashion / look at her.
Anonymous
12/15/2022 13:08
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
ugh just no.
Anonymous
12/15/2022 10:57
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
I’ve hardly call Nicole “heavily wrinkled”!
Do you mean if the jeans are going to be hemmed, then why not have them hemmed just a bit more? Also, different classes would’ve been an obvious better choice..
DP. I think what's aging about the NK video is that she's hobbled herself with sunglasses and presumably high heels inside long hemmed pants. They have someone stationed at that door, because the stoop is a hazard, but getting an assist makes her look geriatric. Then she has to raise her glasses to avoid some other issue.
Anonymous
12/15/2022 10:55
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous
12/13/2022 10:33
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim looks young though. Nicole looks much much older than her.
...because she is. 13 years.
It's almost the same age difference as between Kim and Kendall. Kendall looks younger than Kim, what a surprise!
Kim doesn’t look that much older than Kendall though. Nicole Kidman looks like Kim’s mom in that pic.
No, she does not. And that statement is hyperbolic and absurd.
What exactly is absurd about it? Kim has no wrinkles, sagging in that picture. NK is heavily wrinkled, especially her neck, and her thinness exaggerates it.
I’ve hardly call Nicole “heavily wrinkled”!
DP. I think what's aging about the NK video is that she's hobbled herself with sunglasses and presumably high heels inside long hemmed pants. They have someone stationed at that door, because the stoop is a hazard, but getting an assist makes her look geriatric. Then she has to raise her glasses to avoid some other issue.
Anonymous
12/13/2022 01:38
Subject: Re:High Fashion in your 50s
Anonymous wrote:Halle Berry is nearing 60 and she looks super and fashionable:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CljaYyDrjuk/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Yes she does. But that's not the same as high fashion. She looks classic and current and gorgeous.