Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fair points made in these comments. Historically Pride has been a primary feeder into Capital. Capital has relied heavily on the talent Pride develops through MS to quickly field competitive HS teams. This has been going on for years, but it seems more recently Pride players are making up a bigger percentage of Capital teams. Pride is clearly developing the talent, Capital is doing a great job of taking this talent and positioning it for college recruiting. Capital has the history, college coach connections, former college players to leverage, and importantly a well-thought out process to get the talent Pride is developing recruited. Both clubs are really helping each other by playing needed roles. What is funny is the Capital parents who come on this board to bash Pride are really biting the hand that feeds Capital. Capital is not developing the talent overnight, this talent is developed over years. Capital is playing the last mile of a long race and does a great job at it. Both clubs need each other, but if Pride ever makes recruiting a priority things may get interesting. Seems like both clubs are happy with the roles they play though.
I don’t think it has anything to do with Pride or Stars or BLC. Maybe it just has something to do with the players and not what club team they join.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not surprising you didn’t understand.
The kid matters, not the parent for getting better. A lot of people think their kid is good because they live in the right area and in 3rd grade got put on a team with the best kid in the area. Your kid either has the DNA, work ethic, toughness and resiliency or they do not. Living in the DMV probably means they need to live through something tragic to get the last two.
Mannnnnnn….. Shut Da FUQ Up
Read this back out loud to hear how dumb you sound.
College rosters all over the country filled with girls from the DMV
This is about lacrosse not battling the Nazis in World War 2.
“Living in the DMV probably means they need to live through something tragic to get the last two” Damn kids in the DMV not playing on fields litter with land mines laid down by the third reich - sofffftttttt….
I repeat SHUT DA FUQ UP!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don’t think it has anything to do with Pride or Stars or BLC. Maybe it just has something to do with the players and not what club team they join.
Are you saying the feeder clubs have nothing to do with developing player talent?
Anonymous wrote:Not surprising you didn’t understand.
The kid matters, not the parent for getting better. A lot of people think their kid is good because they live in the right area and in 3rd grade got put on a team with the best kid in the area. Your kid either has the DNA, work ethic, toughness and resiliency or they do not. Living in the DMV probably means they need to live through something tragic to get the last two.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don’t think it has anything to do with Pride or Stars or BLC. Maybe it just has something to do with the players and not what club team they join.
Are you saying the feeder clubs have nothing to do with developing player talent?
The players just develop themselves, didn't you know club makes no difference?
The 27 BLC and Pride teams will have the most representation on 27 Capital blue. Stars will have the lowest number of players of the 3 clubs. It's no coincidence why. The player development isn't there. It does look like Stars has thrown resources at the 27 team but we shall see how that takes shape this spring.
I agree with you that the kids are the kids and they are what they are.
But what are these resources you mention? Bring in a nutritionist or strength coach? I disagree with that. You either have better kids because your geographic area provides that for you (with an exception or two) or your area does not. Pride doesn’t do better than Stars because of Pride, it does so because McLean, Great Falls, Arlington has more, better girls than the Alexandria, Springfield area. BLC is good this year because they kept most of that grades Bethesda’s kids who happen to be good.
Disclaimer- Unlike the BLC parents on this thread who study teenage girls, I don’t know who any of the girls are or where they come from - I’m just assuming and not claiming that I’m an authority on 13 year old girls.
If you have the best kids, your team should win. Coaches might be good for a goal or two in a game but not much more. And I’ll up my hot take, if BLC 2027 is the best of the three it’s probably because they have the best girl of the three on their team. If Pride is better than Stars it’s because Pride’s best player is better than Stars best player. Having better players is what it’s all about. 90 minutes or 180 minutes of practice isn’t turning these girls into UNC light. Only everyday practice, daily film and lifting and someone watching your every move does that. And no, a session a week at Healthy Baller doesn’t do it either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don’t think it has anything to do with Pride or Stars or BLC. Maybe it just has something to do with the players and not what club team they join.
Are you saying the feeder clubs have nothing to do with developing player talent?
The players just develop themselves, didn't you know club makes no difference?
The 27 BLC and Pride teams will have the most representation on 27 Capital blue. Stars will have the lowest number of players of the 3 clubs. It's no coincidence why. The player development isn't there. It does look like Stars has thrown resources at the 27 team but we shall see how that takes shape this spring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don’t think it has anything to do with Pride or Stars or BLC. Maybe it just has something to do with the players and not what club team they join.
Are you saying the feeder clubs have nothing to do with developing player talent?
Anonymous wrote:
I don’t think it has anything to do with Pride or Stars or BLC. Maybe it just has something to do with the players and not what club team they join.
Anonymous wrote:Fair points made in these comments. Historically Pride has been a primary feeder into Capital. Capital has relied heavily on the talent Pride develops through MS to quickly field competitive HS teams. This has been going on for years, but it seems more recently Pride players are making up a bigger percentage of Capital teams. Pride is clearly developing the talent, Capital is doing a great job of taking this talent and positioning it for college recruiting. Capital has the history, college coach connections, former college players to leverage, and importantly a well-thought out process to get the talent Pride is developing recruited. Both clubs are really helping each other by playing needed roles. What is funny is the Capital parents who come on this board to bash Pride are really biting the hand that feeds Capital. Capital is not developing the talent overnight, this talent is developed over years. Capital is playing the last mile of a long race and does a great job at it. Both clubs need each other, but if Pride ever makes recruiting a priority things may get interesting. Seems like both clubs are happy with the roles they play though.
Anonymous wrote:Bill is not a great coach, he always inherits players so it looks like he is great, but he is not. He just hams it up with the parents and players and pretends to be everyone’s friend.