Anonymous wrote:Well, we've learned plenty about the UVA teams this week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, we've learned plenty about the UVA teams this week.
What did we learn?
Anonymous wrote:Well, we've learned plenty about the UVA teams this week.
Anonymous wrote:Has the issue of "lacrosse culture" come up in the Huguely trial?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have to say: I don't really see what makes an exciting sport to watch or play. So, you cradle a ball in some old scottish designed net/stick, throw it to someone who catches it and try to get it into a goal. wipty doo. How does that compare to a 80 yard touch down running past 5 potential tackles or a end of game touch down pass. By comparison it seems silly. Perhaps these guys are legends in their own mind? I don't see lacrosse on TV every sunday. Even if it is a small east coast prep school / Ivy thing, who cares. Your so- called phenomenon involves what , maybe 1000 people. Who cares.
The Scots have nothing to do with lacrosse, let alone "designed" the stick. Your post is unbelievably ignorant.
Anonymous wrote:I have to say: I don't really see what makes an exciting sport to watch or play. So, you cradle a ball in some old scottish designed net/stick, throw it to someone who catches it and try to get it into a goal. wipty doo. How does that compare to a 80 yard touch down running past 5 potential tackles or a end of game touch down pass. By comparison it seems silly. Perhaps these guys are legends in their own mind? I don't see lacrosse on TV every sunday. Even if it is a small east coast prep school / Ivy thing, who cares. Your so- called phenomenon involves what , maybe 1000 people. Who cares.
Anonymous wrote:We talking about athletes and athleticism -- not manners. But, on that subject many non athletic lacrosse enthusiasts have poor manners to boot.