Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Do you want to compare the Ws or FCPS school outcomes to the outcomes from Eastern High? For families that can afford to be in bounds for Wilson (and who insist that Chevy Chase DC is not the suburbs while Chevy Chase MD is clearly the suburbs) DCPS works fine. For families that would be inbounds to any other high school, it's easier to move than hope for lottery luck
This argument makes no sense to me. If your child does well at their suburban school, they’d also probably do well, and most likely ranked even higher at Eastern.
Just curious, are you planning to send your child to Eastern?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Do you want to compare the Ws or FCPS school outcomes to the outcomes from Eastern High? For families that can afford to be in bounds for Wilson (and who insist that Chevy Chase DC is not the suburbs while Chevy Chase MD is clearly the suburbs) DCPS works fine. For families that would be inbounds to any other high school, it's easier to move than hope for lottery luck
This argument makes no sense to me. If your child does well at their suburban school, they’d also probably do well, and most likely ranked even higher at Eastern.
Anonymous wrote:Your odds of getting high rank, impressive recommendation letters, endorsement from guidance counselors/principals, having leadership positions are better where you are in top tier of students, not where you are just one of hundreds. You can also alleviate your peers with your good example and make a good impact. Nothing better for a young person's confidence than peer to peer tutoring, leadership positions and admiration of teachers. All of that shows in essays and interviews.
Anonymous wrote:Your odds of getting high rank, impressive recommendation letters, endorsement from guidance counselors/principals, having leadership positions are better where you are in top tier of students, not where you are just one of hundreds. You can also alleviate your peers with your good example and make a good impact. Nothing better for a young person's confidence than peer to peer tutoring, leadership positions and admiration of teachers. All of that shows in essays and interviews.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Do you want to compare the Ws or FCPS school outcomes to the outcomes from Eastern High? For families that can afford to be in bounds for Wilson (and who insist that Chevy Chase DC is not the suburbs while Chevy Chase MD is clearly the suburbs) DCPS works fine. For families that would be inbounds to any other high school, it's easier to move than hope for lottery luck
This argument makes no sense to me. If your child does well at their suburban school, they’d also probably do well, and most likely ranked even higher at Eastern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Do you want to compare the Ws or FCPS school outcomes to the outcomes from Eastern High? For families that can afford to be in bounds for Wilson (and who insist that Chevy Chase DC is not the suburbs while Chevy Chase MD is clearly the suburbs) DCPS works fine. For families that would be inbounds to any other high school, it's easier to move than hope for lottery luck
This argument makes no sense to me. If your child does well at their suburban school, they’d also probably do well, and most likely ranked even higher at Eastern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Do you want to compare the Ws or FCPS school outcomes to the outcomes from Eastern High? For families that can afford to be in bounds for Wilson (and who insist that Chevy Chase DC is not the suburbs while Chevy Chase MD is clearly the suburbs) DCPS works fine. For families that would be inbounds to any other high school, it's easier to move than hope for lottery luck
This argument makes no sense to me. If your child does well at their suburban school, they’d also probably do well, and most likely ranked even higher at Eastern.
Higher rank?! High rank at a lackluster school is hardly good preparation for college or life! And not a good use of 4 years of time, nor a particularly life-fulfilling experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anecdotally, a lot of my DD’s 1st grade classmates on the Hill are moving to the burbs this summer. Not sure if it’s more than usual or not (certainly more than past summers though). At least 4 of 19 in her class alone.
This always happens. People stay in DC to get the free preschool and then they go where they really want to raise kids.
Exactly. These people were never going to stay anyway. They came to DC as young professionals, "played city" for a while (which was super progressive and cool), then are returning to the suburbs where they were raised themselves.
I seriously will never understand what’s wrong with this. It’s fun and easy to live in a city when you’re young and don’t have kids. And it’s easy and nice to live in the suburbs when you do have kids. What’s so evil and wrong about this that you say it with such disdain?
DP but the problem is when these born-and-bred suburbanites breed and move back to the suburbs (like they were always bound to do) and then talk about how they had to leave DC because of how scary and dangerous and terrible DCPS is over drinks with their suburban neighbors and then come spew it on these boards like "well I did live in The City but I HAD TO LEAVE because THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" Just say you like well-stocked Targets and HOAs and driving to dog parks. You want cool kid cred for having been here at one point and some kind of superior parent cred for moving when you couldn't afford it anymore. You were never going to stay, and DC is not in any way deficient for failing to keep you here.
Every word rings true here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Do you want to compare the Ws or FCPS school outcomes to the outcomes from Eastern High? For families that can afford to be in bounds for Wilson (and who insist that Chevy Chase DC is not the suburbs while Chevy Chase MD is clearly the suburbs) DCPS works fine. For families that would be inbounds to any other high school, it's easier to move than hope for lottery luck
This argument makes no sense to me. If your child does well at their suburban school, they’d also probably do well, and most likely ranked even higher at Eastern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Do you want to compare the Ws or FCPS school outcomes to the outcomes from Eastern High? For families that can afford to be in bounds for Wilson (and who insist that Chevy Chase DC is not the suburbs while Chevy Chase MD is clearly the suburbs) DCPS works fine. For families that would be inbounds to any other high school, it's easier to move than hope for lottery luck
Anonymous wrote:There is a reason moving to suburban schools doesn't lead to desired college admissions results.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anecdotally, a lot of my DD’s 1st grade classmates on the Hill are moving to the burbs this summer. Not sure if it’s more than usual or not (certainly more than past summers though). At least 4 of 19 in her class alone.
This always happens. People stay in DC to get the free preschool and then they go where they really want to raise kids.
Exactly. These people were never going to stay anyway. They came to DC as young professionals, "played city" for a while (which was super progressive and cool), then are returning to the suburbs where they were raised themselves.
I seriously will never understand what’s wrong with this. It’s fun and easy to live in a city when you’re young and don’t have kids. And it’s easy and nice to live in the suburbs when you do have kids. What’s so evil and wrong about this that you say it with such disdain?
DP but the problem is when these born-and-bred suburbanites breed and move back to the suburbs (like they were always bound to do) and then talk about how they had to leave DC because of how scary and dangerous and terrible DCPS is over drinks with their suburban neighbors and then come spew it on these boards like "well I did live in The City but I HAD TO LEAVE because THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" Just say you like well-stocked Targets and HOAs and driving to dog parks. You want cool kid cred for having been here at one point and some kind of superior parent cred for moving when you couldn't afford it anymore. You were never going to stay, and DC is not in any way deficient for failing to keep you here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its even more beneficial for white and Asian kids to attend inner city schools.
I can't figure out if you're someone I relate to or a total troll. This being DCUM, I have my guesses.