Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I’m one of them. This is the right decision for the SC to make. I also don’t want Muslim prayer rooms taken out of public schools.
This has nothing to do with prayer rooms. Prayer rooms merely provide the opportunity for people to exercise their religion in PRIVATE. How do you feel about a teacher rolling out a mat in class and praying?
I actually have no problem with it. If he/she is demanding kids also do the same and we have hard evidence that if they don’t their grades are consistently marked lower, THAT behavior would have to be corrected. But I STILL would not take away the Muslim teacher’s right to pray.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much passion about saying a prayer. Mostly from folks with zero skin in the game. Out with prayer because the kids have so many other things now to influence them - so many things to desensitize their reactions to violence and hate. Much better way to go.
So many other things? Like what?
Social media, video games on demand, any and every type of media one wants to access via the internet. You must be trolling with that question.
Video games and social media are not allowed in school either. What exactly is your point?
What are you even talking about? And you are kidding yourself if you think social media is "not allowed" in a public school classroom. Do you have children??
The point is that if you think prayer is the worst influence in today's society, you are simply wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much passion about saying a prayer. Mostly from folks with zero skin in the game. Out with prayer because the kids have so many other things now to influence them - so many things to desensitize their reactions to violence and hate. Much better way to go.
So many other things? Like what?
Social media, video games on demand, any and every type of media one wants to access via the internet. You must be trolling with that question.
Video games and social media are not allowed in school either. What exactly is your point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it is. Read the case.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
Many felt like they had to join his sessions because then they wouldn’t get playing time over those who did if they didn’t.
That is just not true at all.
Read the case and the oral arguments and statements from the school and the parents. There was zero coercion.
If you think that persons in positions of authority over children - like coaches and teachers - can ask children to join in prayer to Jesus Christ without having Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or agnostic children feeling coerced then you clearly have no understanding of children and the power of teachers and coaches over them. Would you ever say that a student could avoid sexual advances by a coach because there was no "coercion"? Simply being in a position of authority over children implies a level of coercive power.
Congratulations. You’ve just become every parent furious with school boards - the same ones you’ve degraded these past years.
Great - so you agree that teaching Kindergarteners about sexual orientation is perhaps a level of coercive power?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it is. Read the case.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
Many felt like they had to join his sessions because then they wouldn’t get playing time over those who did if they didn’t.
That is just not true at all.
Read the case and the oral arguments and statements from the school and the parents. There was zero coercion.
If you think that persons in positions of authority over children - like coaches and teachers - can ask children to join in prayer to Jesus Christ without having Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or agnostic children feeling coerced then you clearly have no understanding of children and the power of teachers and coaches over them. Would you ever say that a student could avoid sexual advances by a coach because there was no "coercion"? Simply being in a position of authority over children implies a level of coercive power.
Congratulations. You’ve just become every parent furious with school boards - the same ones you’ve degraded these past years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much passion about saying a prayer. Mostly from folks with zero skin in the game. Out with prayer because the kids have so many other things now to influence them - so many things to desensitize their reactions to violence and hate. Much better way to go.
I’m Jewish and, if my kid was on that team, I wouldn’t want them feeling pressured to participate in a Christian prayer.
Try to get it.
Your kid wasn’t on that team so you are not affected in anyway shape or form!
You’re a moron. The Supreme Court just made this everybody’s business by saying any coach or teacher teacher at any public school can push their religion on kids under their supervision as long as they tell kids that they have authority over that it is it is voluntary. It is a license to manipulate kids and abuse public positions of authority and plenty of a-holes will use that license.
Actually, no. That is not the ruling.
They ruled that the coach is able to exercise HIS free speech and HIS religious beliefs. If the kids want to participate, that is up to them.
You people are trying to make this into something it isn't...... as most of the issues that you disagree with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I’m one of them. This is the right decision for the SC to make. I also don’t want Muslim prayer rooms taken out of public schools.
This has nothing to do with prayer rooms. Prayer rooms merely provide the opportunity for people to exercise their religion in PRIVATE. How do you feel about a teacher rolling out a mat in class and praying?
Anonymous wrote:
I’m one of them. This is the right decision for the SC to make. I also don’t want Muslim prayer rooms taken out of public schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much passion about saying a prayer. Mostly from folks with zero skin in the game. Out with prayer because the kids have so many other things now to influence them - so many things to desensitize their reactions to violence and hate. Much better way to go.
I’m Jewish and, if my kid was on that team, I wouldn’t want them feeling pressured to participate in a Christian prayer.
Try to get it.
Your kid wasn’t on that team so you are not affected in anyway shape or form!
You’re a moron. The Supreme Court just made this everybody’s business by saying any coach or teacher teacher at any public school can push their religion on kids under their supervision as long as they tell kids that they have authority over that it is it is voluntary. It is a license to manipulate kids and abuse public positions of authority and plenty of a-holes will use that license.
Actually, no. That is not the ruling.
They ruled that the coach is able to exercise HIS free speech and HIS religious beliefs. If the kids want to participate, that is up to them.
You people are trying to make this into something it isn't...... as most of the issues that you disagree with.
He can pray independently and/or in private, nobody is stopping him from praying. If he wants to preach to a group he can become a pastor and do that in church.
As a person in a position of authority, he does not get to use that platform, funded by taxpayers, to promote his religion. How would you like it if your child’s teacher started each class by rolling out a mat and praying to Allah?
Why are you lying about what he is doing? He is not preaching to anyone. He is praying.
And, once again for those who are outraged and uninformed..... the few students who expressed discomfort with joining in the prayer...... this coach made them co-captains for their willingness to speak up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it is. Read the case.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
Many felt like they had to join his sessions because then they wouldn’t get playing time over those who did if they didn’t.
That is just not true at all.
Read the case and the oral arguments and statements from the school and the parents. There was zero coercion.
If you think that persons in positions of authority over children - like coaches and teachers - can ask children to join in prayer to Jesus Christ without having Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or agnostic children feeling coerced then you clearly have no understanding of children and the power of teachers and coaches over them. Would you ever say that a student could avoid sexual advances by a coach because there was no "coercion"? Simply being in a position of authority over children implies a level of coercive power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
I do not believe in God, I do not want my children being led in prayer in their public school and I consider this ruling a violation of my and my children's religious freedom. I might be more appalled by this than the abortion ruling for which I disagreed, but could follow the constitutional logic. This literally is pushing me to vote democratic when I've been frustrated with Biden and the far left.
No child was forced to join in prayer. The coach had the right to exercise his religion freely.
Do you truly not understand human social power dynamics or are you just arguing? Being a leader comes with responsibility. Using your power to manipulate minors or subordinates is not moral.
And just what do parents do every day? Thank you for making your ridiculous point for everyone to see!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
Many felt like they had to join his sessions because then they wouldn’t get playing time over those who did if they didn’t.