Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From reading about how controlled she was in ever aspect of her life under the conservatorship this is a way for her to take the reins of her life back. Hopefully things turn out well for her + the baby. Hopefully, the guy is decent, but that is doubtful.

A grown woman but mentally unstable and frankly her behavior in the past was downright scary she was incapable of raising her two bots, regardless if the conservatorship were too restrictive and long or not.

We don’t know anything about her; that was all media projection, which she chafed under. As far as I know, she has never said she has Bpd.

I find it so sad that women are trying to act like they know better than she does re what she should do with her life and body. It was a media narrative that the conservatatorship was good for her. Her father and friends used it to control her and steal from her. It is very hard to come out of one because she’s had no agency did more than a decade. I wish her well. At least she’s finally living in her own terms.

If there is/was nothing mentally wrong, why did she lose custody of her kids? And only regain minimal custody to then lose it again? If there was nothing wrong like you think, her focus would be on the existing children she has.

Let’s also ask why there was a conservatorship that put her abusive father at the helm to steal her money? That alone would probably make me lose my mind.

I never listened to her music and I’m not a fan but the conservators hip caught my attention. I’m so glad she’s free and hope she has trustworthy people in place to help her.

We do not know if KF was a good dad or not.
It’s bizarre some of you think you actually know what is going on. Lol. You’re just eating up gossip magazine chatter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i don't think she's actually pregnant.

agreed.
And Sam's insta post was oddly non confirming.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do her meds (I assume she's on meds given her bipolar, anxiety, and anything else she has) make viable pregnancy possible? A lit of the side effects from those prescriptions have a long list of warnings about conceiving.

She has bipolar disorder?

No. The internet is diagnosing her. This thread is disgusting.

Nobody knows exactly what Britney's medical issues are. I see a woman who grew up in a toxic family and then was exposed to toxic levels of fame. So what if she shaved her head. The legal arrangement was brought about because 1) her dad Jamie is an asshole and 2) Britney is worth many many millions and 3) Sexist society - never would have happened if she were a guy.

I diagnose Britney with having a toxic family and maybe ADHD. And definitely PTSD.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From reading about how controlled she was in ever aspect of her life under the conservatorship this is a way for her to take the reins of her life back. Hopefully things turn out well for her + the baby. Hopefully, the guy is decent, but that is doubtful.

A grown woman but mentally unstable and frankly her behavior in the past was downright scary she was incapable of raising her two bots, regardless if the conservatorship were too restrictive and long or not.

We don’t know anything about her; that was all media projection, which she chafed under. As far as I know, she has never said she has Bpd.

I find it so sad that women are trying to act like they know better than she does re what she should do with her life and body. It was a media narrative that the conservatatorship was good for her. Her father and friends used it to control her and steal from her. It is very hard to come out of one because she’s had no agency did more than a decade. I wish her well. At least she’s finally living in her own terms.

If there is/was nothing mentally wrong, why did she lose custody of her kids? And only regain minimal custody to then lose it again? If there was nothing wrong like you think, her focus would be on the existing children she has.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember when the Free Britney crowd thought she was an eloquent genius and being forced to post spiral videos by her handlers?

Apparently they were just forcing her to NOT post nudes which now she’s doing in spades. This feels like Anna Nicole Smith…

Anonymous wrote:Remember when the Free Britney crowd thought she was an eloquent genius and being forced to post spiral videos by her handlers?

Anonymous wrote:The baby daddy knows that the baby is his meal ticket. He can easily threaten to do the same thing her other baby daddy did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I'm very happy that Britney is happy (she deserves it after what she has been through) I can never be excited about a child being born under circumstances like this.

My mom also had a very difficult life, with abusive parents. She really wanted to be a mom and was thrilled to have me and my siblings. And she was a pretty bad mom to us.

What I learned as an adult is that while your childhood trauma isn't your fault, you have a responsibility to address it. It's frustrating. My childhood trauma was caused by my parents' childhood trauma. It wasn't my fault and in a way it wasn't theirs either. And yet there it is.

I think it would have been better for her to take more time (out of the public eye) to process what happened to her and come to terms with it, and then either try to conceive (with money, you can conceive very late and have a healthy baby) or go the surrogate or adoption route. Is this "fair" to Britney? No, none of this is fair to her. But in choosing to have this baby now, she is making it very likely that she will be dealing with past trauma while trying to parent a young child. Even with money, this is bad for the child. So waiting and addressing her own issue first would be most fair to the child. And that's whose needs have to be paramount in this situation because they are completely powerless.

Life is deeply unfair but having a baby doesn't solve that, it just kicks the can down the road. I wound up in therapy/recovery for twenty years before being very fortunate to have one very wanted child in my 40s. Every day I am grateful to my younger self, and my therapist, for doing the work then so that I can be the parent I want to be now.

Plenty of bad mothers with or without past trauma. Just believing you’re a great mom doesn’t make you one. We have no idea if Britney will be a good mom, but she has the resources to ensure her kids are cared for and the child also has a father. The kid will be fine.

Money isn’t everything. Having stable parents is extremely important. She hasn’t been a very competent or involved mother to her current kids, so why have another? If she isn’t capable of getting back at least 50-50 custody of them now, then she should not be having another kid.

You can’t be a very good mother yourself if you don’t understand that not demanding 50/50 custody is the kindest thing she can do with older teen boys. She is giving up her time with them not to disrupt their schedules. She is putting her own ego aside for their sakes.

You seem very naive about the impact of mental illness.

Actually I am extremely familiar. You just seem ignorant.

Hardly. Her limited time with them over the years is not because she's putting her ego aside.

Exactly. I feel like her publicist is on the thread.

+1

People who are insane enough to believe that Britney Spear’s publicist is hanging around DCUM are not remotely equipped to assess the mental health of others.

Britney and her publicist do not give a shit what you assholes think. "Oh I am happy for her but worry about the health of the baby." What a backhanded compliment from another nasty DCUM harpie. They can monitor that baby in the womb, they have technology now, you realize that right? Britney will probably go on to have a few more babies with her hot young Iranian husband while you guys watch your grey haired wrinkled husbands burp and fart on the couch and pick the crusties out of his pubic hair and flick it on the floor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I'm very happy that Britney is happy (she deserves it after what she has been through) I can never be excited about a child being born under circumstances like this.

My mom also had a very difficult life, with abusive parents. She really wanted to be a mom and was thrilled to have me and my siblings. And she was a pretty bad mom to us.

What I learned as an adult is that while your childhood trauma isn't your fault, you have a responsibility to address it. It's frustrating. My childhood trauma was caused by my parents' childhood trauma. It wasn't my fault and in a way it wasn't theirs either. And yet there it is.

I think it would have been better for her to take more time (out of the public eye) to process what happened to her and come to terms with it, and then either try to conceive (with money, you can conceive very late and have a healthy baby) or go the surrogate or adoption route. Is this "fair" to Britney? No, none of this is fair to her. But in choosing to have this baby now, she is making it very likely that she will be dealing with past trauma while trying to parent a young child. Even with money, this is bad for the child. So waiting and addressing her own issue first would be most fair to the child. And that's whose needs have to be paramount in this situation because they are completely powerless.

Life is deeply unfair but having a baby doesn't solve that, it just kicks the can down the road. I wound up in therapy/recovery for twenty years before being very fortunate to have one very wanted child in my 40s. Every day I am grateful to my younger self, and my therapist, for doing the work then so that I can be the parent I want to be now.

Plenty of bad mothers with or without past trauma. Just believing you’re a great mom doesn’t make you one. We have no idea if Britney will be a good mom, but she has the resources to ensure her kids are cared for and the child also has a father. The kid will be fine.

Money isn’t everything. Having stable parents is extremely important. She hasn’t been a very competent or involved mother to her current kids, so why have another? If she isn’t capable of getting back at least 50-50 custody of them now, then she should not be having another kid.

You can’t be a very good mother yourself if you don’t understand that not demanding 50/50 custody is the kindest thing she can do with older teen boys. She is giving up her time with them not to disrupt their schedules. She is putting her own ego aside for their sakes.

You seem very naive about the impact of mental illness.

Actually I am extremely familiar. You just seem ignorant.

Hardly. Her limited time with them over the years is not because she's putting her ego aside.

Exactly. I feel like her publicist is on the thread.

+1

People who are insane enough to believe that Britney Spear’s publicist is hanging around DCUM are not remotely equipped to assess the mental health of others.

Britney and her publicist do not give a shit what you assholes think. "Oh I am happy for her but worry about the health of the baby." What a backhanded compliment from another nasty DCUM harpie. They can monitor that baby in the womb, they have technology now, you realize that right? Britney will probably go on to have a few more babies with her hot young Iranian husband while you guys watch your grey haired wrinkled husbands burp and fart on the couch and pick the crusties out of his pubic hair and flick it on the floor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I'm very happy that Britney is happy (she deserves it after what she has been through) I can never be excited about a child being born under circumstances like this.

My mom also had a very difficult life, with abusive parents. She really wanted to be a mom and was thrilled to have me and my siblings. And she was a pretty bad mom to us.

What I learned as an adult is that while your childhood trauma isn't your fault, you have a responsibility to address it. It's frustrating. My childhood trauma was caused by my parents' childhood trauma. It wasn't my fault and in a way it wasn't theirs either. And yet there it is.

I think it would have been better for her to take more time (out of the public eye) to process what happened to her and come to terms with it, and then either try to conceive (with money, you can conceive very late and have a healthy baby) or go the surrogate or adoption route. Is this "fair" to Britney? No, none of this is fair to her. But in choosing to have this baby now, she is making it very likely that she will be dealing with past trauma while trying to parent a young child. Even with money, this is bad for the child. So waiting and addressing her own issue first would be most fair to the child. And that's whose needs have to be paramount in this situation because they are completely powerless.

Life is deeply unfair but having a baby doesn't solve that, it just kicks the can down the road. I wound up in therapy/recovery for twenty years before being very fortunate to have one very wanted child in my 40s. Every day I am grateful to my younger self, and my therapist, for doing the work then so that I can be the parent I want to be now.

Plenty of bad mothers with or without past trauma. Just believing you’re a great mom doesn’t make you one. We have no idea if Britney will be a good mom, but she has the resources to ensure her kids are cared for and the child also has a father. The kid will be fine.

Money isn’t everything. Having stable parents is extremely important. She hasn’t been a very competent or involved mother to her current kids, so why have another? If she isn’t capable of getting back at least 50-50 custody of them now, then she should not be having another kid.

You can’t be a very good mother yourself if you don’t understand that not demanding 50/50 custody is the kindest thing she can do with older teen boys. She is giving up her time with them not to disrupt their schedules. She is putting her own ego aside for their sakes.

You seem very naive about the impact of mental illness.

Actually I am extremely familiar. You just seem ignorant.

Hardly. Her limited time with them over the years is not because she's putting her ego aside.

Exactly. I feel like her publicist is on the thread.

+1

People who are insane enough to believe that Britney Spear’s publicist is hanging around DCUM are not remotely equipped to assess the mental health of others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I'm very happy that Britney is happy (she deserves it after what she has been through) I can never be excited about a child being born under circumstances like this.

My mom also had a very difficult life, with abusive parents. She really wanted to be a mom and was thrilled to have me and my siblings. And she was a pretty bad mom to us.

What I learned as an adult is that while your childhood trauma isn't your fault, you have a responsibility to address it. It's frustrating. My childhood trauma was caused by my parents' childhood trauma. It wasn't my fault and in a way it wasn't theirs either. And yet there it is.

I think it would have been better for her to take more time (out of the public eye) to process what happened to her and come to terms with it, and then either try to conceive (with money, you can conceive very late and have a healthy baby) or go the surrogate or adoption route. Is this "fair" to Britney? No, none of this is fair to her. But in choosing to have this baby now, she is making it very likely that she will be dealing with past trauma while trying to parent a young child. Even with money, this is bad for the child. So waiting and addressing her own issue first would be most fair to the child. And that's whose needs have to be paramount in this situation because they are completely powerless.

Life is deeply unfair but having a baby doesn't solve that, it just kicks the can down the road. I wound up in therapy/recovery for twenty years before being very fortunate to have one very wanted child in my 40s. Every day I am grateful to my younger self, and my therapist, for doing the work then so that I can be the parent I want to be now.

Plenty of bad mothers with or without past trauma. Just believing you’re a great mom doesn’t make you one. We have no idea if Britney will be a good mom, but she has the resources to ensure her kids are cared for and the child also has a father. The kid will be fine.

Money isn’t everything. Having stable parents is extremely important. She hasn’t been a very competent or involved mother to her current kids, so why have another? If she isn’t capable of getting back at least 50-50 custody of them now, then she should not be having another kid.

You can’t be a very good mother yourself if you don’t understand that not demanding 50/50 custody is the kindest thing she can do with older teen boys. She is giving up her time with them not to disrupt their schedules. She is putting her own ego aside for their sakes.

You seem very naive about the impact of mental illness.

Actually I am extremely familiar. You just seem ignorant.

Hardly. Her limited time with them over the years is not because she's putting her ego aside.

Exactly. I feel like her publicist is on the thread.

+1

People who are insane enough to believe that Britney Spear’s publicist is hanging around DCUM are not remotely equipped to assess the mental health of others.