Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I do find it funny watching the middle school teachers met down about what an impossible schedule this is while elementary teachers have been doing it for years, often with young children who are so overtired by our 3:40 dismissal.
I don’t know why you find it funny that a relatively drastic change in schedule is problematic for people who often work two jobs. Many middle school teachers have a second job after school or help with clubs/sports that they can’t do if school gets out around 4. Elem and middle school teachers took these positions knowing the bell schedule. They planned their lives and incomes around the schedule. Same as elem school teachers nervous about what they are going to do with childcare at 7am when many pre-schools are already full for the fall. Just because middle school teachers have done it, doesn’t mean elem school teachers can do it without enough planning. I grew up here. These bell times have been fairly constant for 30 years. People knew going into the profession about what time they would work.
+1 million
PP is ignorant as hell
Anonymous wrote:The current bell schedules are fine, except for that stupid 9 am start for some elementary schools. That was the biggest PITA when my kid was at Science Focus. I had to pay a lot of money every month just to drop my kid off at a time when other elementary schools were already in session, as I had to do drop off and pick up and still commute and put in 8 hours at a job, which meant I had to pay for full aftercare anyway. Especially since the kid was up at the crack of dawn anyway. I’m loving the early morning middle school start, as we still don’t get a bus and I can now be at my desk by 8am and can be home by 4:30.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I do find it funny watching the middle school teachers met down about what an impossible schedule this is while elementary teachers have been doing it for years, often with young children who are so overtired by our 3:40 dismissal.
I don’t know why you find it funny that a relatively drastic change in schedule is problematic for people who often work two jobs. Many middle school teachers have a second job after school or help with clubs/sports that they can’t do if school gets out around 4. Elem and middle school teachers took these positions knowing the bell schedule. They planned their lives and incomes around the schedule. Same as elem school teachers nervous about what they are going to do with childcare at 7am when many pre-schools are already full for the fall. Just because middle school teachers have done it, doesn’t mean elem school teachers can do it without enough planning. I grew up here. These bell times have been fairly constant for 30 years. People knew going into the profession about what time they would work.
+1 million
PP is ignorant as hell
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS should keep tweaks as minimal as possible while meeting their transportation goals. If they need to make large shifts in time for some schools, limit it to choice schools and programs.
Wholesale flipping around of start times would have far reaching implications beyond the school day, from those that have already been mentioned, to stresses on facility and sports scheduling- pools, fields, gyms, etc. MS and HS should end their school days earlier to give students time to both participate in extracurricular activities and still have time to get homework and studying completed. Not to mention that it allows older siblings to be available to care for younger ones or hold a desperately needed part time job.
Tweaks ok, massive shifts not.
I like how you just completely ignore the research on physical and mental health impact to teenagers of early school start times (especially the current middle school start time). I guess their needs don’t deserve consideration in your analysis?
Oh, I considered it. I also considered that teenagers could get plenty of sleep if they go to bed earlier. There’s nothing magical about later school start times- it’s about getting enough sleep, whether that happens at night or in the morning. I managed early school starts, as did all my schoolmates, my husband and his schoolmates, my kids currently, along with students all around the world. The problem is bad sleep hygiene, not school start times.
The way things work in highly-populated areas today, I disagree. If your school starts at 7:50 but your soccer game isn't until 8:00 pm, that's not just a matter of irresponsibly getting to bed on time to make sure you get sufficient sleep. No, not everyone is involved in sports and such. No, you don't have to participate in extracurriculars. BUt extracurriculars - especially physical ones - are increasingly important for multiple reasons: social connections, developing social skills, and most importantly for physical health in a society where even kids are mostly sedentary.
The problem there would be a soccer game scheduled at 8 pm on a school night for middle schoolers. Activities that start that late are not the norm.
Not to mention, most of our fields in Arlington do not have lights so you cannot have too many games that late. Kids that play on middle school teams wouldn’t be finished with school games until around 530/6 ( with a 4 PM school release time). So they likely would have to make a choice between school team and other teams. Not to mention, when does homework and dinner happen? I am personally torn. I would love for my kids to be able to sleep later but I think the crunch with getting out an hour and a half later is going to impact many families, teams (Ora rice and fame times), athletic field availability— which will trickle down to impacting elementary school field availability/activity availability as well.
Having to make a choice between a school team or another team? Oh the horror...
The kids wouldn’t have to choose. There would be no middle school sports if middle school started later. The fields, gyms, pools etc are all used by high school, club and rec sports by that time. The county needs the revenue from club and rec fees for maintenance. And some middle school coaches are also high school coaches. If middle schools end around 4pm, 100% middle school sports and many clubs/activities wouldn’t be offered.
Is this why Fairfax Co doesn’t have middle school sports?
No. Fairfax Middle Schools start at 7:30am. They have never had the same sports tradition they arlington has. They had intramural after school sports at their schools, just didn’t play against other schools like Arlington does. Maybe because they are further apart and don’t have buses available.
Anonymous wrote:
I do find it funny watching the middle school teachers met down about what an impossible schedule this is while elementary teachers have been doing it for years, often with young children who are so overtired by our 3:40 dismissal.
I don’t know why you find it funny that a relatively drastic change in schedule is problematic for people who often work two jobs. Many middle school teachers have a second job after school or help with clubs/sports that they can’t do if school gets out around 4. Elem and middle school teachers took these positions knowing the bell schedule. They planned their lives and incomes around the schedule. Same as elem school teachers nervous about what they are going to do with childcare at 7am when many pre-schools are already full for the fall. Just because middle school teachers have done it, doesn’t mean elem school teachers can do it without enough planning. I grew up here. These bell times have been fairly constant for 30 years. People knew going into the profession about what time they would work.
Anonymous wrote:
Is this why Fairfax Co doesn’t have middle school sports?
No. Fairfax Middle Schools start at 7:30am. They have never had the same sports tradition they arlington has. They had intramural after school sports at their schools, just didn’t play against other schools like Arlington does. Maybe because they are further apart and don’t have buses available.
Anonymous wrote:I do find it funny watching the middle school teachers met down about what an impossible schedule this is while elementary teachers have been doing it for years, often with young children who are so overtired by our 3:40 dismissal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS should keep tweaks as minimal as possible while meeting their transportation goals. If they need to make large shifts in time for some schools, limit it to choice schools and programs.
Wholesale flipping around of start times would have far reaching implications beyond the school day, from those that have already been mentioned, to stresses on facility and sports scheduling- pools, fields, gyms, etc. MS and HS should end their school days earlier to give students time to both participate in extracurricular activities and still have time to get homework and studying completed. Not to mention that it allows older siblings to be available to care for younger ones or hold a desperately needed part time job.
Tweaks ok, massive shifts not.
I like how you just completely ignore the research on physical and mental health impact to teenagers of early school start times (especially the current middle school start time). I guess their needs don’t deserve consideration in your analysis?
Oh, I considered it. I also considered that teenagers could get plenty of sleep if they go to bed earlier. There’s nothing magical about later school start times- it’s about getting enough sleep, whether that happens at night or in the morning. I managed early school starts, as did all my schoolmates, my husband and his schoolmates, my kids currently, along with students all around the world. The problem is bad sleep hygiene, not school start times.
The way things work in highly-populated areas today, I disagree. If your school starts at 7:50 but your soccer game isn't until 8:00 pm, that's not just a matter of irresponsibly getting to bed on time to make sure you get sufficient sleep. No, not everyone is involved in sports and such. No, you don't have to participate in extracurriculars. BUt extracurriculars - especially physical ones - are increasingly important for multiple reasons: social connections, developing social skills, and most importantly for physical health in a society where even kids are mostly sedentary.
The problem there would be a soccer game scheduled at 8 pm on a school night for middle schoolers. Activities that start that late are not the norm.
Not to mention, most of our fields in Arlington do not have lights so you cannot have too many games that late. Kids that play on middle school teams wouldn’t be finished with school games until around 530/6 ( with a 4 PM school release time). So they likely would have to make a choice between school team and other teams. Not to mention, when does homework and dinner happen? I am personally torn. I would love for my kids to be able to sleep later but I think the crunch with getting out an hour and a half later is going to impact many families, teams (Ora rice and fame times), athletic field availability— which will trickle down to impacting elementary school field availability/activity availability as well.
Having to make a choice between a school team or another team? Oh the horror...
The kids wouldn’t have to choose. There would be no middle school sports if middle school started later. The fields, gyms, pools etc are all used by high school, club and rec sports by that time. The county needs the revenue from club and rec fees for maintenance. And some middle school coaches are also high school coaches. If middle schools end around 4pm, 100% middle school sports and many clubs/activities wouldn’t be offered.
Is this why Fairfax Co doesn’t have middle school sports?
Anonymous wrote:Transportation and most specifically option school bussing is a huge resource suck. Option school busses can take up to an hour to run their route and are very expensive. End option school bussing or make it sliding scale based on ability to pay (like parks and rec). Even better, end the option schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS should keep tweaks as minimal as possible while meeting their transportation goals. If they need to make large shifts in time for some schools, limit it to choice schools and programs.
Wholesale flipping around of start times would have far reaching implications beyond the school day, from those that have already been mentioned, to stresses on facility and sports scheduling- pools, fields, gyms, etc. MS and HS should end their school days earlier to give students time to both participate in extracurricular activities and still have time to get homework and studying completed. Not to mention that it allows older siblings to be available to care for younger ones or hold a desperately needed part time job.
Tweaks ok, massive shifts not.
I like how you just completely ignore the research on physical and mental health impact to teenagers of early school start times (especially the current middle school start time). I guess their needs don’t deserve consideration in your analysis?
Oh, I considered it. I also considered that teenagers could get plenty of sleep if they go to bed earlier. There’s nothing magical about later school start times- it’s about getting enough sleep, whether that happens at night or in the morning. I managed early school starts, as did all my schoolmates, my husband and his schoolmates, my kids currently, along with students all around the world. The problem is bad sleep hygiene, not school start times.
The way things work in highly-populated areas today, I disagree. If your school starts at 7:50 but your soccer game isn't until 8:00 pm, that's not just a matter of irresponsibly getting to bed on time to make sure you get sufficient sleep. No, not everyone is involved in sports and such. No, you don't have to participate in extracurriculars. BUt extracurriculars - especially physical ones - are increasingly important for multiple reasons: social connections, developing social skills, and most importantly for physical health in a society where even kids are mostly sedentary.
The problem there would be a soccer game scheduled at 8 pm on a school night for middle schoolers. Activities that start that late are not the norm.
Not to mention, most of our fields in Arlington do not have lights so you cannot have too many games that late. Kids that play on middle school teams wouldn’t be finished with school games until around 530/6 ( with a 4 PM school release time). So they likely would have to make a choice between school team and other teams. Not to mention, when does homework and dinner happen? I am personally torn. I would love for my kids to be able to sleep later but I think the crunch with getting out an hour and a half later is going to impact many families, teams (Ora rice and fame times), athletic field availability— which will trickle down to impacting elementary school field availability/activity availability as well.
Having to make a choice between a school team or another team? Oh the horror...
The kids wouldn’t have to choose. There would be no middle school sports if middle school started later. The fields, gyms, pools etc are all used by high school, club and rec sports by that time. The county needs the revenue from club and rec fees for maintenance. And some middle school coaches are also high school coaches. If middle schools end around 4pm, 100% middle school sports and many clubs/activities wouldn’t be offered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like such a wasted effort. No one was asking for a change.
OTOH the community has asked for lots of other changes like reading instruction, something academic that would actually benefit students, and that is the slowest process ever
This is my question. What's so terrible about the current system that warrants this process?
It's all about consolidating the bus routes and schedules. It has nothing to do with anything else, no matter what others might say or what types of response options are on the survey. It's about transportation efficiency. Period.
I think it's dual purpose: transportation efficiencies and following the myriad of studies recommending that MS and HS start later than most currently do
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS should keep tweaks as minimal as possible while meeting their transportation goals. If they need to make large shifts in time for some schools, limit it to choice schools and programs.
Wholesale flipping around of start times would have far reaching implications beyond the school day, from those that have already been mentioned, to stresses on facility and sports scheduling- pools, fields, gyms, etc. MS and HS should end their school days earlier to give students time to both participate in extracurricular activities and still have time to get homework and studying completed. Not to mention that it allows older siblings to be available to care for younger ones or hold a desperately needed part time job.
Tweaks ok, massive shifts not.
I like how you just completely ignore the research on physical and mental health impact to teenagers of early school start times (especially the current middle school start time). I guess their needs don’t deserve consideration in your analysis?
Oh, I considered it. I also considered that teenagers could get plenty of sleep if they go to bed earlier. There’s nothing magical about later school start times- it’s about getting enough sleep, whether that happens at night or in the morning. I managed early school starts, as did all my schoolmates, my husband and his schoolmates, my kids currently, along with students all around the world. The problem is bad sleep hygiene, not school start times.
The way things work in highly-populated areas today, I disagree. If your school starts at 7:50 but your soccer game isn't until 8:00 pm, that's not just a matter of irresponsibly getting to bed on time to make sure you get sufficient sleep. No, not everyone is involved in sports and such. No, you don't have to participate in extracurriculars. BUt extracurriculars - especially physical ones - are increasingly important for multiple reasons: social connections, developing social skills, and most importantly for physical health in a society where even kids are mostly sedentary.
The problem there would be a soccer game scheduled at 8 pm on a school night for middle schoolers. Activities that start that late are not the norm.
Not to mention, most of our fields in Arlington do not have lights so you cannot have too many games that late. Kids that play on middle school teams wouldn’t be finished with school games until around 530/6 ( with a 4 PM school release time). So they likely would have to make a choice between school team and other teams. Not to mention, when does homework and dinner happen? I am personally torn. I would love for my kids to be able to sleep later but I think the crunch with getting out an hour and a half later is going to impact many families, teams (Ora rice and fame times), athletic field availability— which will trickle down to impacting elementary school field availability/activity availability as well.
Having to make a choice between a school team or another team? Oh the horror...