Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, less than 3% of Fall Church PS parents have opted out of masking, as they now are able to. Anti-maskers thinking they are in the majority are in actuality in some crazy echo chamber.

I mean, it's been a day. Give it time.

Also, why is everyone so scared of a small percentage of the school population being unmasked?

Exactly. If so few people choose to unmask then doesn’t that prove it should be mask optional? That allows the families whose kids are not doing well with masking to opt out and barely moves the needle. Of course, the reality is that most parents are afraid of being socially ostracized for wanting masks off their kids, but everyone can see which way the wind is blowing and it will soon be socially acceptable to go mask free. At that point the mask always crowd will have FOMO.

Well I support Universal masking but I'm not having my kid mask if others in their classes are not showing them the same courtesy. I'm happy to participate in a group mitigation effort but not planning to give a special priviledge to a whiny subset of people that only cares about themselves.

That... doesn't make sense. You're in favor of masking unless someone else doesn't have to, in which case you don't believe in masking? Sounds like you aren't actually that into masking after all.

Agree. If you believe masks provide significant benefit, wouldn't those that are masked have the special privilege?

My mask protects you, your mask protects me. Surely you’ve heard that. It’s a collective action.

The new info is one person in a KN95 has more protection than two in surgical masks. It's 2022 - not 2020 anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's still forcing public school families into a situation he isn't choosing for his own kid. #hypocrisy

His kid's school is mask optional before my kid's school, so I'm not really sure what your point is.

He was trying to force mask optional on other people before his kid's school was mask optional. If he thought mask optional was so important, why didn't he put his kid in a mask optional school?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's still forcing public school families into a situation he isn't choosing for his own kid. #hypocrisy

His kid's school is mask optional before my kid's school, so I'm not really sure what your point is.

Anonymous wrote:He's still forcing public school families into a situation he isn't choosing for his own kid. #hypocrisy

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad he'd put children at risk this way, all to boost his base.

He was elected to do this. Parents of at-risk students will have the option to mask their child.

(funny that the governor won't put his OWN kids in a school that don't require masks...clearly he doesn't think masks are the child abuse that many of his supporters think...)

* I'm for losing the masks within the next few weeks, by the way....but the hypocrisy here just kills me....

This is the stupidest pro-forced masker argument I've heard. His kids are in the middle of high school. And newsflash - Georgetown Prep went mask optional yesterday.

His kid is in 11th grade and newsflash, he could have transferred to a Richmond area school (and gasp, maybe even a PUBLIC school) at the semester mark, right about the time the family moved into the Governors mansion located in Richmond. Instead they are choosing to keep him in the elite private school two hours away. Don’t tell me it would be traumatic for his kid to have to move mid year through his 11th grade year. Military members - and other government employees - move every few years and their kids change school mid year all of the time, including at the high school level. If they survive it, Younkin’s kid would survive it. Once again, though, different rules apply for the rich kids. Youngkin decided to run for Governor while his kid was still in high school, he should have thought about the imaging of that. He would have a lot more respect as governor when he signs EO’s about how public schools are run if his kid actually attended a Virginia public school. And yes, I know Dem politicians send their kids to private school as well. IMO, everyone who makes decisions for public school kids should be required to have their kids in public schools - from the school board on up. Wishful thinking, I know….

I strongly dislike the governor, but isn’t it pretty disruptive for military families to move do much? It’s hardly an aspirational model.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad he'd put children at risk this way, all to boost his base.

He was elected to do this. Parents of at-risk students will have the option to mask their child.

(funny that the governor won't put his OWN kids in a school that don't require masks...clearly he doesn't think masks are the child abuse that many of his supporters think...)

* I'm for losing the masks within the next few weeks, by the way....but the hypocrisy here just kills me....

This is the stupidest pro-forced masker argument I've heard. His kids are in the middle of high school. And newsflash - Georgetown Prep went mask optional yesterday.

His kid is in 11th grade and newsflash, he could have transferred to a Richmond area school (and gasp, maybe even a PUBLIC school) at the semester mark, right about the time the family moved into the Governors mansion located in Richmond. Instead they are choosing to keep him in the elite private school two hours away. Don’t tell me it would be traumatic for his kid to have to move mid year through his 11th grade year. Military members - and other government employees - move every few years and their kids change school mid year all of the time, including at the high school level. If they survive it, Younkin’s kid would survive it. Once again, though, different rules apply for the rich kids. Youngkin decided to run for Governor while his kid was still in high school, he should have thought about the imaging of that. He would have a lot more respect as governor when he signs EO’s about how public schools are run if his kid actually attended a Virginia public school. And yes, I know Dem politicians send their kids to private school as well. IMO, everyone who makes decisions for public school kids should be required to have their kids in public schools - from the school board on up. Wishful thinking, I know….

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad he'd put children at risk this way, all to boost his base.

He was elected to do this. Parents of at-risk students will have the option to mask their child.

(funny that the governor won't put his OWN kids in a school that don't require masks...clearly he doesn't think masks are the child abuse that many of his supporters think...)

* I'm for losing the masks within the next few weeks, by the way....but the hypocrisy here just kills me....

This is the stupidest pro-forced masker argument I've heard. His kids are in the middle of high school. And newsflash - Georgetown Prep went mask optional yesterday.

His kid is in 11th grade and newsflash, he could have transferred to a Richmond area school (and gasp, maybe even a PUBLIC school) at the semester mark, right about the time the family moved into the Governors mansion located in Richmond. Instead they are choosing to keep him in the elite private school two hours away. Don’t tell me it would be traumatic for his kid to have to move mid year through his 11th grade year. Military members - and other government employees - move every few years and their kids change school mid year all of the time, including at the high school level. If they survive it, Younkin’s kid would survive it. Once again, though, different rules apply for the rich kids. Youngkin decided to run for Governor while his kid was still in high school, he should have thought about the imaging of that. He would have a lot more respect as governor when he signs EO’s about how public schools are run if his kid actually attended a Virginia public school. And yes, I know Dem politicians send their kids to private school as well. IMO, everyone who makes decisions for public school kids should be required to have their kids in public schools - from the school board on up. Wishful thinking, I know….

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad he'd put children at risk this way, all to boost his base.

He was elected to do this. Parents of at-risk students will have the option to mask their child.

(funny that the governor won't put his OWN kids in a school that don't require masks...clearly he doesn't think masks are the child abuse that many of his supporters think...)

* I'm for losing the masks within the next few weeks, by the way....but the hypocrisy here just kills me....

This is the stupidest pro-forced masker argument I've heard. His kids are in the middle of high school. And newsflash - Georgetown Prep went mask optional yesterday.

His kid is in 11th grade and newsflash, he could have transferred to a Richmond area school (and gasp, maybe even a PUBLIC school) at the semester mark, right about the time the family moved into the Governors mansion located in Richmond. Instead they are choosing to keep him in the elite private school two hours away. Don’t tell me it would be traumatic for his kid to have to move mid year through his 11th grade year. Military members - and other government employees - move every few years and their kids change school mid year all of the time, including at the high school level. If they survive it, Younkin’s kid would survive it. Once again, though, different rules apply for the rich kids. Youngkin decided to run for Governor while his kid was still in high school, he should have thought about the imaging of that. He would have a lot more respect as governor when he signs EO’s about how public schools are run if his kid actually attended a Virginia public school. And yes, I know Dem politicians send their kids to private school as well. IMO, everyone who makes decisions for public school kids should be required to have their kids in public schools - from the school board on up. Wishful thinking, I know….

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad he'd put children at risk this way, all to boost his base.

He was elected to do this. Parents of at-risk students will have the option to mask their child.

(funny that the governor won't put his OWN kids in a school that don't require masks...clearly he doesn't think masks are the child abuse that many of his supporters think...)

* I'm for losing the masks within the next few weeks, by the way....but the hypocrisy here just kills me....

This is the stupidest pro-forced masker argument I've heard. His kids are in the middle of high school. And newsflash - Georgetown Prep went mask optional yesterday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad he'd put children at risk this way, all to boost his base.

He was elected to do this. Parents of at-risk students will have the option to mask their child.

(funny that the governor won't put his OWN kids in a school that don't require masks...clearly he doesn't think masks are the child abuse that many of his supporters think...)

* I'm for losing the masks within the next few weeks, by the way....but the hypocrisy here just kills me....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, less than 3% of Fall Church PS parents have opted out of masking, as they now are able to. Anti-maskers thinking they are in the majority are in actuality in some crazy echo chamber.

I mean, it's been a day. Give it time.

Also, why is everyone so scared of a small percentage of the school population being unmasked?

Because they want their own kid to mask and they are afraid they are going to have to deal with the blowback of that when other kids are not masking.