Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair, they were in a public place. Anyone can take pictures or video of people who are in public places.

Sounds like an excellent way to get yourself ejected from an establishment or punched in the face.

Punched in the face? That would be prison and a lawsuit.

Low IQ people tend to resort to violence because they can’t form and articulate complete thoughts.

What's low IQ is thinking that anyone is going to be arrested or successfully sued for defending themselves against an obvious voyeur.

Yes, they most certainly ARE going to be arrested for assaulting a person who is violating NO laws.

PRISON... for a punch to a perv?? 🤣🤣
No way on earth anyone's going to *prison*, they may get a night in jail, but prison?!?

And I HIGHLY doubt the perv would press charges anyway, as that would lead to him having to hand over his cell phone as evidence during the discovery phase, and something tells me that Mr. Looky Loo wouldn't want ANYONE, but especially the police seeing ccx what's on that phone.

Remember, it's all too easy for prosecutors to subpoena cell carriers, and no matter if the guy deletes the evidence or smashes his phone, that evidence is stored with the carrier forever.

So, something tells me there'd certainly wouldn't be any prison time (lol) but no jail time either... well, maybe for the stupid perv IF anyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair, they were in a public place. Anyone can take pictures or video of people who are in public places.

Sounds like an excellent way to get yourself ejected from an establishment or punched in the face.

Punched in the face? That would be prison and a lawsuit.

Low IQ people tend to resort to violence because they can’t form and articulate complete thoughts.

What's low IQ is thinking that anyone is going to be arrested or successfully sued for defending themselves against an obvious voyeur.

Yes, they most certainly ARE going to be arrested for assaulting a person who is violating NO laws.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your 25 year old daughter couldn’t figure out what to do without your help? Yikes.

I wouldn't have known exactly what to do and I'm 34.

Anonymous wrote:Our antiquated laws have not caught up with modern technology.

This issue of videoing without consent, among many other online privacy issues, need to be addressed by law makers.

Anonymous wrote:Right now all you would have to do is go have a coughing fit on two stupid middle aged guys hanging out in Starbucks during a pandemic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Human traffickers or Sex offenders.

Make sure that your DD is never alone, parks safely, carries a pepper spray, has her location sharing on.

OP here. Exactly what I thought as well. One man = pervert. Two together = potential human traffickers

Location sharing is critical. Verizon can take up to 24 hours to provide that if not on.

Human trafficing? Are you a qanon nut? Tell us honestly. You are a drama loving nut job.

That was confirmed in Website feedback.

Q'Non. No. Never go to their site. I do know there's human trafficking in FFX county and it seems police were aiding and abetting. I'm simply interested in answering my DD's texts when she feels unsafe.

Thanks for verifying the bolded.

Can you please give me three positive reasons why two 50+ year old men would whip out a cell phone to film young girls they don’t know?

Since when is a 25 year old woman a “young girl”?

When she has a hysterical helicopter mother.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Human traffickers or Sex offenders.

Make sure that your DD is never alone, parks safely, carries a pepper spray, has her location sharing on.

OP here. Exactly what I thought as well. One man = pervert. Two together = potential human traffickers

Location sharing is critical. Verizon can take up to 24 hours to provide that if not on.

Human trafficing? Are you a qanon nut? Tell us honestly. You are a drama loving nut job.

That was confirmed in Website feedback.

Q'Non. No. Never go to their site. I do know there's human trafficking in FFX county and it seems police were aiding and abetting. I'm simply interested in answering my DD's texts when she feels unsafe.

Thanks for verifying the bolded.

Can you please give me three positive reasons why two 50+ year old men would whip out a cell phone to film young girls they don’t know?

Since when is a 25 year old woman a “young girl”?

Anonymous wrote:My 18-year-old DD would have kicked him in the shins. Then in the balls.