Anonymous wrote:taking an illegal gun across state lines is an offense, though
Anonymous wrote:Rittenhouse crossed state lines, and armed himself with a weapon and illegally went out disobeying a legal curfew, all with the intent of illegally inflicting some idea of "vigilante justice." And then he shot and killed a guy for throwing a plastic CVS bag at him, and after that he shot another guy who was trying to stop him from shooting other people by trying to knock the gun out of his hand after he shot the first guy.
That's the bottom line where it comes to Rittenhouse. No ifs, ands or buts.
Yes, the other guys were also violating curfew, and yes, the guy he shot had a prior record, but none of that is relevant.
Anyone who thinks he's some kind of hero is defending a criminal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He’s a loser, and will always be a loser. Why do we have to keep talking about him? He just wants to extend his 5 minutes of fame for being a killer. No thanks.
Mostly because it’s entertaining to watch how the GOP fawns all over a little snit who wanted to live out his video game fantasies and go kill someone, so he did.
Anonymous wrote:He’s a loser, and will always be a loser. Why do we have to keep talking about him? He just wants to extend his 5 minutes of fame for being a killer. No thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.
He was not there “defending” anything.
He was defending his life.
He had his mommy drive him there. It's not like anyone showed up at his door. This kid went looking for people to kill and he found them.
So? He is allowed to break curfew laws just like anyone else.
And he's allowed to kill people just like anyone else, too.
He is allowed to defend his life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.
He was not there “defending” anything.
He was defending his life.
He had his mommy drive him there. It's not like anyone showed up at his door. This kid went looking for people to kill and he found them.
So? He is allowed to break curfew laws just like anyone else.
And he's allowed to kill people just like anyone else, too.
Anonymous wrote:Rittenhouse crossed state lines, and armed himself with a weapon and illegally went out disobeying a legal curfew, all with the intent of illegally inflicting some idea of "vigilante justice." And then he shot and killed a guy for throwing a plastic CVS bag at him, and after that he shot another guy who was trying to stop him from shooting other people by trying to knock the gun out of his hand after he shot the first guy.
That's the bottom line where it comes to Rittenhouse. No ifs, ands or buts.
Yes, the other guys were also violating curfew, and yes, the guy he shot had a prior record, but none of that is relevant.
Anyone who thinks he's some kind of hero is defending a criminal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rittenhouse crossed state lines, and armed himself with a weapon and illegally went out disobeying a legal curfew, all with the intent of illegally inflicting some idea of "vigilante justice." And then he shot and killed a guy for throwing a plastic CVS bag at him, and after that he shot another guy who was trying to stop him from shooting other people by trying to knock the gun out of his hand after he shot the first guy.
That's the bottom line where it comes to Rittenhouse. No ifs, ands or buts.
Yes, the other guys were also violating curfew, and yes, the guy he shot had a prior record, but none of that is relevant.
Anyone who thinks he's some kind of hero is defending a criminal.
He’s in fact NOT a criminal, and a jury empaneled by the state said so. You are actually committing libel in this post, and are exposing yourself and possibly this website, to a lawsuit.
If I were you, I’d ask for this post to be deleted.
Anonymous wrote:Rittenhouse crossed state lines, and armed himself with a weapon and illegally went out disobeying a legal curfew, all with the intent of illegally inflicting some idea of "vigilante justice." And then he shot and killed a guy for throwing a plastic CVS bag at him, and after that he shot another guy who was trying to stop him from shooting other people by trying to knock the gun out of his hand after he shot the first guy.
That's the bottom line where it comes to Rittenhouse. No ifs, ands or buts.
Yes, the other guys were also violating curfew, and yes, the guy he shot had a prior record, but none of that is relevant.
Anyone who thinks he's some kind of hero is defending a criminal.
Anonymous wrote:Rittenhouse crossed state lines, and armed himself with a weapon .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.
He was not there “defending” anything.
He was defending his life.
He had his mommy drive him there. It's not like anyone showed up at his door. This kid went looking for people to kill and he found them.
So? He is allowed to break curfew laws just like anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s not forget, his mommy had to drive him to this place. Not his neighborhood or even his state.
He was not there “defending” anything.
He was defending his life.
He had his mommy drive him there. It's not like anyone showed up at his door. This kid went looking for people to kill and he found them.