Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:many girls at Stone Ridge (where my daughter is enrolled) are demanding to be called he/him, they/them, and even it
How does “it” make anybody feel good?
Anonymous wrote:many girls at Stone Ridge (where my daughter is enrolled) are demanding to be called he/him, they/them, and even it
Anonymous wrote:many girls at Stone Ridge (where my daughter is enrolled) are demanding to be called he/him, they/them, and even it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank God it isn't Stone Ridge. I hope they stay off that track. We hope to enroll our daughter this year.
PS Because it is a school that goes as young as K, I sincerely doubt they would ever adopt this on a whole school level.
If you think this won't be an issue, you're so wrong.
There have been trans students at SR for several years now.
They ain't going anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well now we have LD and mentally disordered people taking a page from the LGBTQ activist manual so get ready for that wave of privilege and attention and quotas.
It’s just “thinking differently” so accommodate and comply.
This is offensive, ignorant and unnecessary.
Students with learning differences have been learning to quietly advocate for their needs for many years well before this gender fluidity phenom. Teachers who are trained to engage different kinds of learners actually fare better with neuro typical students since the teaching empowers all students (understanding how they learn best, engaging as many senses as possible to learn material, and managing time and materials in most effective ways.
Also many students with learning differences have very high IQs and it is better for society to be able to utilize their many gifts (such as lateral thinking, big picture thinking, creative problem solving) rather than to stigmatize them and squander their gifts.
+1,000
+1
You will only undermine the positions of those of us who argue for right to refer to girls as girls and pro female pronouns if you engage in negative foolish insults against students with learning differences. The IDEA Act was first introduced 40 years ago to protect the legal rights of students with learning differences to optimal education. Educating for Neurological diversity is not a Johnny Come Lately social trend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NCS is really doing no better at handling this issue. The administration is beholden to the Glasgow Group and we’ve got minders at each level to monitor our wokeness.
Disagree. I think NCS has been practical and thoughtful in handling these issues. Why do you stay at a school that clearly you do not like or agree with? There are other schools that would better suit you.
+100 the constraint complaining is not healthy for them or their kids. Kids pick up on your cues and it makes stressed to know you dislike their school so much. Move on to another school if you are so unhappy with inclusion and kindness.
Anonymous wrote:So should we be ashamed of the word girls and women? We are doing more damage to ourselves as a sex and gender with allowing all this nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well now we have LD and mentally disordered people taking a page from the LGBTQ activist manual so get ready for that wave of privilege and attention and quotas.
It’s just “thinking differently” so accommodate and comply.
This is offensive, ignorant and unnecessary.
Students with learning differences have been learning to quietly advocate for their needs for many years well before this gender fluidity phenom. Teachers who are trained to engage different kinds of learners actually fare better with neuro typical students since the teaching empowers all students (understanding how they learn best, engaging as many senses as possible to learn material, and managing time and materials in most effective ways.
Also many students with learning differences have very high IQs and it is better for society to be able to utilize their many gifts (such as lateral thinking, big picture thinking, creative problem solving) rather than to stigmatize them and squander their gifts.
+1,000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NCS is really doing no better at handling this issue. The administration is beholden to the Glasgow Group and we’ve got minders at each level to monitor our wokeness.
Disagree. I think NCS has been practical and thoughtful in handling these issues. Why do you stay at a school that clearly you do not like or agree with? There are other schools that would better suit you.
Anonymous wrote:NCS is really doing no better at handling this issue. The administration is beholden to the Glasgow Group and we’ve got minders at each level to monitor our wokeness.