Anonymous wrote:Thank you to Jeff Steele and the numerous St. Stephens and St. Agnes parents that have brought this to my attention. My coaching staff and school admin are actively working on finding these guys and can say with confidence that they will be facing repercussions since we have confirmed their respective schools. Though it is not what I'd like to be doing on a night after our win, I can't let it go on any further. Thanks again, Kathy
Anonymous wrote:Thank you to Jeff Steele and the numerous St. Stephens and St. Agnes parents that have brought this to my attention. My coaching staff and school admin are actively working on finding these guys and can say with confidence that they will be facing repercussions since we have confirmed their respective schools. Though it is not what I'd like to be doing on a night after our win, I can't let it go on any further. Thanks again, Kathy
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello all, this is SSSAS coach Kathy Jenkins. First off, these allegations are completely untrue and the person nor persons spreading them will be prosecuted. I have spent 49 years at St. Stephen’s and have not once ever thought of giving my girls PEDS. The school as well as I will be tracking down this user and taking legal action.
Coach Jenkins,
The IP address of the poster who has been defaming you is 96.241.148.25. A subpoena to Verizon should help you identify him.
Thank you Jeff! Your support to this community does not go unnoticed. We will find these kids and have serious repercussions for them.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello all, this is SSSAS coach Kathy Jenkins. First off, these allegations are completely untrue and the person nor persons spreading them will be prosecuted. I have spent 49 years at St. Stephen’s and have not once ever thought of giving my girls PEDS. The school as well as I will be tracking down this user and taking legal action.
Coach Jenkins,
The IP address of the poster who has been defaming you is 96.241.148.25. A subpoena to Verizon should help you identify him.
Thank you Jeff! Your support to this community does not go unnoticed. We will find these kids and have serious repercussions for them.
Anonymous wrote:Not only was the officiating at Potomac and SSSAS (from what I hear) bad, the failure to keep things in line student section wise was terrible. I mean at what point do we draw the line?
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks there is any justification for calling a mouse guard violation with 10 or so seconds left in a tied game is a lunatic.
Just be glad you got the call, justifying it sounds stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Visi and Potomac did not lose today. SSSAS and SR were gifted those games by refs who definitely inserted themselves into the game via over-officiating or being intimidated by coaches. Both outcomes were not decided by the play on the field but by the ones who either blew the whistle too much or were too intimidated to overrule obvious calls or non-calls. It's truly ashame that the games were not decided by the girls.
Anonymous wrote:Visi and Potomac did not lose today. SSSAS and SR were gifted those games by refs who definitely inserted themselves into the game via over-officiating or being intimidated by coaches. Both outcomes were not decided by the play on the field but by the ones who either blew the whistle too much or were too intimidated to overrule obvious calls or non-calls. It's truly ashame that the games were not decided by the girls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until today I have never seen an award-the-ball-technical foul for a mouthguard violation. It happening in the fourth quarter of a very tight playoff lacrosse game was very unfortunate timing.
It was literally dangling out of her mouth
Yeah, I know. I have never seen it called and timing was unfortunate.
It was actually laying on the field.
Due to the check from behind that was not called...
Sorry. Just saw game video. No check.
Sorry, the video has been deleted. Technical glitch.
Just like the clock (shot and game) all game!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until today I have never seen an award-the-ball-technical foul for a mouthguard violation. It happening in the fourth quarter of a very tight playoff lacrosse game was very unfortunate timing.
It was literally dangling out of her mouth
Yeah, I know. I have never seen it called and timing was unfortunate.
It was actually laying on the field.
Due to the check from behind that was not called...
Sorry. Just saw game video. No check.
Sorry, the video has been deleted. Technical glitch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks there is any justification for calling a mouse guard violation with 10 or so seconds left in a tied game is a lunatic.
Just be glad you got the call, justifying it sounds stupid.
What is a “mouse guard” and why do the rules change with how much time is left in the clock?
If this is a rising Visi elementary school student asking these question please find another forum to post to.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hello all, this is SSSAS coach Kathy Jenkins. First off, these allegations are completely untrue and the person nor persons spreading them will be prosecuted. I have spent 49 years at St. Stephen’s and have not once ever thought of giving my girls PEDS. The school as well as I will be tracking down this user and taking legal action.
Coach Jenkins,
The IP address of the poster who has been defaming you is 96.241.148.25. A subpoena to Verizon should help you identify him.
I hope you know it is incredibly dangerous to put someone’s ip address on the public web, whether they said something bad or not. This is outrageous, you are threatening the safety and security of a family here by putting that.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks there is any justification for calling a mouse guard violation with 10 or so seconds left in a tied game is a lunatic.
Just be glad you got the call, justifying it sounds stupid.