Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Wrong again. It’s reading comprehension. The House and the Senate both have to approve legislation. So yes, indeed, the House “along with the Senate” has to approve it.

Civilian federal pay raises are the easiest cut for the parties to compromise on. Obama did it for years

Other than being petty and vindictive, that cut doesn't even ripple the waters as far as "cuts" go.

Look at the annual raises under Obama.

So what? It'd didn't make ripples then, either. Feds are often political pawns but their salaries are not breaking the budget. It's the entitlement program and the military that suck up the biggest pieces of the pie. The rest is de minimus, relatively speaking.

Let's not forget interest on the debt. It's going to eat everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Wrong again. It’s reading comprehension. The House and the Senate both have to approve legislation. So yes, indeed, the House “along with the Senate” has to approve it.

Civilian federal pay raises are the easiest cut for the parties to compromise on. Obama did it for years

Other than being petty and vindictive, that cut doesn't even ripple the waters as far as "cuts" go.

Look at the annual raises under Obama.

So what? It'd didn't make ripples then, either. Feds are often political pawns but their salaries are not breaking the budget. It's the entitlement program and the military that suck up the biggest pieces of the pie. The rest is de minimus, relatively speaking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Wrong again. It’s reading comprehension. The House and the Senate both have to approve legislation. So yes, indeed, the House “along with the Senate” has to approve it.

Civilian federal pay raises are the easiest cut for the parties to compromise on. Obama did it for years

Other than being petty and vindictive, that cut doesn't even ripple the waters as far as "cuts" go.

Look at the annual raises under Obama.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Wrong again. It’s reading comprehension. The House and the Senate both have to approve legislation. So yes, indeed, the House “along with the Senate” has to approve it.

Civilian federal pay raises are the easiest cut for the parties to compromise on. Obama did it for years

Yes!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Wrong again. It’s reading comprehension. The House and the Senate both have to approve legislation. So yes, indeed, the House “along with the Senate” has to approve it.

Civilian federal pay raises are the easiest cut for the parties to compromise on. Obama did it for years

Other than being petty and vindictive, that cut doesn't even ripple the waters as far as "cuts" go.

I miss the voting. It was so enjoyable watching McCarthy getting more and more humiliated with every vote. I was hoping it would go on for six weeks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Wrong again. It’s reading comprehension. The House and the Senate both have to approve legislation. So yes, indeed, the House “along with the Senate” has to approve it.

Civilian federal pay raises are the easiest cut for the parties to compromise on. Obama did it for years

Results of the disarray

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Wrong again. It’s reading comprehension. The House and the Senate both have to approve legislation. So yes, indeed, the House “along with the Senate” has to approve it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Sure, the guys who spent last week in a circular firing squad for the simple task of electing a leader are going to present a unified front in negotiations with the senate and administration. And McCarthy, whose primary negotiating tactic is to give his opponents absolutely everything they want, will suddenly become an effective negotiator.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Now now. Without me, you would still think the “House has to approve” federal raises. You should be thanking me.

Anonymous wrote:

What did Hannity's tweet say before he deleted it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welp, guessing the 2024 raise for fed employees will be … zero.

Guessing you don’t know how federal raises are determined.

Guessing I do. Guessing I know that the House has to approve them, along with the Senate. No way Republicans will sign off on any raise for civilians.

Thanks for confirming you don’t know how it works.

Assuming arguendo Biden sets a raise amount, GOP House appropriators still must weigh in. They can say nothing or make modifications, up or down. But they will come back with $0 for raises. The Senate will go along with that as part of negotiations over other things, as will Biden ultimately. It’s not just up to the president.

Oh I see someone finally looked up the process, but you still don’t have it quite right .

Nope. Just off the top of my head. You have nothing constructive to contribute it seems.

Anonymous wrote:

Neocon gaslighting.