Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

While 4x is probably? an exaggeration, sounds like a lot of it was not so great shooting, probably mixed in with not great shots (credit the Cosby D) and some good goalie play by the opponent.

Just like Madison, things to work on.

No way a BF opponent had good goalie play considering there is such a big gap.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

While 4x is probably? an exaggeration, sounds like a lot of it was not so great shooting, probably mixed in with not great shots (credit the Cosby D) and some good goalie play by the opponent.

Just like Madison, things to work on.

No way a BF opponent had good goalie play considering there is such a big gap.

What's the over/under on which team dad gets tossed out first?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

While 4x is probably? an exaggeration, sounds like a lot of it was not so great shooting, probably mixed in with not great shots (credit the Cosby D) and some good goalie play by the opponent.

Just like Madison, things to work on.

No way a BF opponent had good goalie play considering there is such a big gap.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

What's the over/under on which team dad gets tossed out first?

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

While 4x is probably? an exaggeration, sounds like a lot of it was not so great shooting, probably mixed in with not great shots (credit the Cosby D) and some good goalie play by the opponent.

Just like Madison, things to work on.

No way a BF opponent had good goalie play considering there is such a big gap.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

While 4x is probably? an exaggeration, sounds like a lot of it was not so great shooting, probably mixed in with not great shots (credit the Cosby D) and some good goalie play by the opponent.

Just like Madison, things to work on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

....but...but...BF always has a huge gap in goalies. No way, Cosby goalie was capable of making great plays. Just like, there's no way Madison goalies will make great plays.

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

While 4x is probably? an exaggeration, sounds like a lot of it was not so great shooting, probably mixed in with not great shots (credit the Cosby D) and some good goalie play by the opponent.

Just like Madison, things to work on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone touched on the big gap in Goalies? One goalie is the best in the state and a D1 commit. The other goalie isn’t even liked by their own coach. I know who I’m picking

I think you missed the coach's meeting with parents. You also should consider re-evaluating your life choices.

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone touched on the big gap in Goalies? One goalie is the best in the state and a D1 commit. The other goalie isn’t even liked by their own coach. I know who I’m picking

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone touched on the big gap in Goalies? One goalie is the best in the state and a D1 commit. The other goalie isn’t even liked by their own coach. I know who I’m picking

Anonymous wrote:where is the game tomorrow being held? i’m a former player and i’d love to see the matchup but i can’t find any info on the vhsl site. good luck to both teams, we hated playing both yall which means this should be a great game!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Madison lost to Battlefield during a tournament game early in the season. Battlefield beat Robo by 2 late in the season where draw controls were fairly evenly split. In the last game with Madison vs Robo- Madison dominated the draws. This time, I think Madison will continue to dominate the draws and will win the championship by a good margin.

Draws are about matchups and clearly BF has a huge matchup advantage over Mad. Mad will not be be able to hang on the circle, and BF will continue to dominate Mad on the draws and this will cause a lopsided win or a championship win by a good margin.

Clearly a huge advantage based on one game 2.5 months ago.

Go ask your draw specialists whether matchups matter. And if they can be a completely different player at it in 2.5 months when they've been working at it for years.
What they can do is make adjustments, scout their last game on film, try to course correct.

The poster I replied to (you?) was using just several games, including trying to use the transitive property, which we all know fails often. As well as couching a late season game that was in fact in April. It's mid-June.

It's the only game of substance to "draw" anything from. Unless Madison's draw girls were out for injury or something. Going to be hot out.

If they have such an amazing circle how did they just beat Cosby by 1? I'm sure you will say its because the matchups are different but I would not say that Cosby has similarly strong midfielders on the circle to Madison. Is your argument that the Battlefield midfielders are stronger at the circle than the Madison midfielders?

You have the faceoff stats vs. Cosby and BF winning it by 1, with 2 teams you're not associated with? Did you really keep a running tab while watching the replay? That's wild.

g

BF won 60% of draws. They had four times as many shots as Cosby. The reason the score was so close is because BF had an extremely sloppy game. They possessed the ball for two thirds of the game

No excuses, wet played terribly and barely pulled it out. But a win is a win no matter how you look at it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BF likes to think they have classy play. ROWDY parents on that team down in the trailer park!!! MAD has a composure BF can’t think of achieving. Let’s get excited for this big game!

Yes, coaches calling the players trailer park kids after they lost to them the first time is very classy. The goalie dad getting warned by the refs in the same game because they are losing is very classy

Let’s put it this way, just because you live in Vienna doesn’t make you classy. But if you are playing for a state championship game does make the actual girls on the field fierce competitors

I have zero respect for the fans or their coaches after we beat them the first time. However, I have a ton of respect for their players who played their hearts out and I will never take anything away from those girls for the way their coaches and parents act

Does BF have obnoxious parents and coaches? Absolutely. It’s a part of the game

Good luck to both sides. I hope the girls play a very physical, settled game. I am fine if my daughter’s team doesn’t win, as long as they leave it all out on the field

Wow, I have been waiting to the Mad fans and coaches to get on here and deny any or all of these comments. Not nothing. Crickets. I guess this poster was accurate on how they actually were acting. Sad. These are high school players and they deserve better. Especially from their coaches. That should have been reported to the AD. So classless from a very classless program

Hope you never get called for jury duty the way you collect and assess "evidence".

The evidence? Seriously? So the players on the sidelines are lying now? So instead of taking accountability, you deflect

Please remember, money talks, and these people love to make their money talk for them