Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OJ was not guilty too…

And Casey Anthony.

Anonymous wrote:OJ was not guilty too…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does Karen Read rebuild her life? She can't go back to white-collar work, can she? I thought she sold her house and burned her retirement.

Movie rights, book(s), maybe even a reality show or two. Podcast, become a motivational speaker for how to Live Your Truth. She’ll be more than fine.

Now that she is out of criminal jeopardy, her very next task is to sit for a deposition in the civil wrongful death suit that is pending against her and which will bankrupt her in perpetuity just as happened to OJ Simpson. Whatever book (do her cult followers read?), movie, docuseries or other media rights she sells, the proceeds will be putting John's niece and nephew through the colleges of their choosing etc.

Couldn’t Karen Read just as easily sue others? She just won a case that determined she didn’t kill JOK. I would think she could sue others for slander?

Seems like any wrongful death suit is against the wrong person (Read). They should sue the police or others who were likely involved in the death. Not someone who is not guilty of the death.

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think she didn't do it - what do you make of JOK's niece testifying that Karen was talking about him possibly getting hit by a snowplow before they ever found his body? Was his niece lying too?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does Karen Read rebuild her life? She can't go back to white-collar work, can she? I thought she sold her house and burned her retirement.

Movie rights, book(s), maybe even a reality show or two. Podcast, become a motivational speaker for how to Live Your Truth. She’ll be more than fine.

Now that she is out of criminal jeopardy, her very next task is to sit for a deposition in the civil wrongful death suit that is pending against her and which will bankrupt her in perpetuity just as happened to OJ Simpson. Whatever book (do her cult followers read?), movie, docuseries or other media rights she sells, the proceeds will be putting John's niece and nephew through the colleges of their choosing etc.

Karen put money in a trust for the kids to go to college so they are all set there.

I think Paul needs to get a job and Peggy needs therapy.

I’m fairly new to this case

Who are P and P?

What trust?

Prior to JOK’s death, there was money set aside for JOK’s niece and nephew. Karen helped JOK set the money aside in safe investment so that the money would be there for future use. She is not on the accounts (never was).
Paul is JOK’s brother and Peggy is his (their) mother.
Peggy fought JOK in the courts for years for custody over the kids and stopped speaking to JOK when he won custody.

So she contributed nothing to the fund? Just helped set it up?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think she didn't do it - what do you make of JOK's niece testifying that Karen was talking about him possibly getting hit by a snowplow before they ever found his body? Was his niece lying too?

No. She was a) assuming the worst because John didn’t come home, as far as he knew leaving his minor niece home alone all night, which she knew he wouldn’t have done, b) still drunk and c) catastrophizing. It’s not unusual for people to jump to a worst case scenario when someone doesn’t come home.

Really?? Really? Hit by a snowplow? That’s a pretty random claim and a pretty convenient one considering what they would find later. Especially when she claims he went inside.

You don’t think that maybe deep down in her subconscious she knew that he was lying by the side of the road and she was coming up with excuses for why?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think she didn't do it - what do you make of JOK's niece testifying that Karen was talking about him possibly getting hit by a snowplow before they ever found his body? Was his niece lying too?

I say the medical evidence is clear that he wasn’t struck by a vehicle and that tells me more than any panicking gibberish she may have been uttering before he was found.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think she didn't do it - what do you make of JOK's niece testifying that Karen was talking about him possibly getting hit by a snowplow before they ever found his body? Was his niece lying too?

No. She was a) assuming the worst because John didn’t come home, as far as he knew leaving his minor niece home alone all night, which she knew he wouldn’t have done, b) still drunk and c) catastrophizing. It’s not unusual for people to jump to a worst case scenario when someone doesn’t come home.

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think she didn't do it - what do you make of JOK's niece testifying that Karen was talking about him possibly getting hit by a snowplow before they ever found his body? Was his niece lying too?

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who think she didn't do it - what do you make of JOK's niece testifying that Karen was talking about him possibly getting hit by a snowplow before they ever found his body? Was his niece lying too?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does Karen Read rebuild her life? She can't go back to white-collar work, can she? I thought she sold her house and burned her retirement.

Movie rights, book(s), maybe even a reality show or two. Podcast, become a motivational speaker for how to Live Your Truth. She’ll be more than fine.

Now that she is out of criminal jeopardy, her very next task is to sit for a deposition in the civil wrongful death suit that is pending against her and which will bankrupt her in perpetuity just as happened to OJ Simpson. Whatever book (do her cult followers read?), movie, docuseries or other media rights she sells, the proceeds will be putting John's niece and nephew through the colleges of their choosing etc.

Couldn’t Karen Read just as easily sue others? She just won a case that determined she didn’t kill JOK. I would think she could sue others for slander?

Seems like any wrongful death suit is against the wrong person (Read). They should sue the police or others who were likely involved in the death. Not someone who is not guilty of the death.

Just a reminder that this is not what "not guilty" means from a legal standpoint. It means that a group of people found that the prosecution, which has the burden of proof, did not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does Karen Read rebuild her life? She can't go back to white-collar work, can she? I thought she sold her house and burned her retirement.

Movie rights, book(s), maybe even a reality show or two. Podcast, become a motivational speaker for how to Live Your Truth. She’ll be more than fine.

Now that she is out of criminal jeopardy, her very next task is to sit for a deposition in the civil wrongful death suit that is pending against her and which will bankrupt her in perpetuity just as happened to OJ Simpson. Whatever book (do her cult followers read?), movie, docuseries or other media rights she sells, the proceeds will be putting John's niece and nephew through the colleges of their choosing etc.

Couldn’t Karen Read just as easily sue others? She just won a case that determined she didn’t kill JOK. I would think she could sue others for slander?

Seems like any wrongful death suit is against the wrong person (Read). They should sue the police or others who were likely involved in the death. Not someone who is not guilty of the death.