Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t watch this show. I am not interested in stories about gay people, non-binary people, transgender people, or stories about micro aggressions. They are boring!

Okay? I think you're not the target audience. There are a lot of othere shows -- and other threads -- though. Maybe you could go over there?

The target audience is NOT “woke” millennials. They THINK they’re going to get them to watch with this nonsense, but no way.

The target audience are the original viewers. And we just want to see what happens to these people. The end. None of this ridiculous writing.

Why do you think this is the only thing that defines the target audience?

Because this show is old. And it had a cult following. No one new is tuning in.

My co-workers in their 20s and 30s are watching. Kim Kardashian is watching. It has been the biggest view audience of a series debut in HBOMax's entire history, and the viewership went up by more than an additional 50% for the second show. That's not all people that look like you and think like you. There just aren't that many of you.

It will be interesting to see where this goes in Nielsen demographics. I'll update the thread when I see it.

Meanwhile, you are (of course) entitled to your opinion. I'd encourage you to consider that there is a lot of the world going on that apparently you don't see or don't understand, but it's still there. Maybe it would be interesting to just let it be and not necessarily try to shut it down.

Well, if Kim Kardashian is watching, you know it must be good.

No, you know it is being watched. "No one new is tuning in" was the error.

Reading comprehension is hard for some people.

So the show has been universally panned and is being put out to pasture next to season. People are watching it - hate-watching it. It's really bad. Trust me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t watch this show. I am not interested in stories about gay people, non-binary people, transgender people, or stories about micro aggressions. They are boring!

Okay? I think you're not the target audience. There are a lot of othere shows -- and other threads -- though. Maybe you could go over there?

The target audience is NOT “woke” millennials. They THINK they’re going to get them to watch with this nonsense, but no way.

The target audience are the original viewers. And we just want to see what happens to these people. The end. None of this ridiculous writing.

Why do you think this is the only thing that defines the target audience?

Because this show is old. And it had a cult following. No one new is tuning in.

My co-workers in their 20s and 30s are watching. Kim Kardashian is watching. It has been the biggest view audience of a series debut in HBOMax's entire history, and the viewership went up by more than an additional 50% for the second show. That's not all people that look like you and think like you. There just aren't that many of you.

It will be interesting to see where this goes in Nielsen demographics. I'll update the thread when I see it.

Meanwhile, you are (of course) entitled to your opinion. I'd encourage you to consider that there is a lot of the world going on that apparently you don't see or don't understand, but it's still there. Maybe it would be interesting to just let it be and not necessarily try to shut it down.

Well, if Kim Kardashian is watching, you know it must be good.

No, you know it is being watched. "No one new is tuning in" was the error.

Reading comprehension is hard for some people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think many of us feel this way about how poor Steve's storyline is being handled.

https://www.thecut.com/2022/01/sex-and-the-citys-steve-deserves-better.html#_ga=2.45936992.553932942.1641502612-776759429.1641502611

He was always too good for her.

Anonymous wrote:I think many of us feel this way about how poor Steve's storyline is being handled.

https://www.thecut.com/2022/01/sex-and-the-citys-steve-deserves-better.html#_ga=2.45936992.553932942.1641502612-776759429.1641502611

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seema should know Carrie well enough by now to know that new place was not remotely her. Hope she enjoyed the commission!

so, the smoke alarm never needed batteries in other apartments?? How does a 55 year old woman not know what that is?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seema should know Carrie well enough by now to know that new place was not remotely her. Hope she enjoyed the commission!

so, the smoke alarm never needed batteries in other apartments?? How does a 55 year old woman not know what that is?

I had the EXACT same thought--what a financially beneficial friendship this is!

The thing about the beeping was so stupid. She's helpless and not very bright.

It's a gorgeous apartment but not at all her speed.

Her whole thing was being clueless at life--no common sense re: finances, refused to develop any practical skills, learn to cook etc. Glad she learned how to sauté a piece of fish but she doesn't have much else to show for the last 30 years. But she's wealthy now, thanks to her marriage, so yay?

Yes, what did Big even see in her? She's a unidimensional idiot. All she does is consume.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seema should know Carrie well enough by now to know that new place was not remotely her. Hope she enjoyed the commission!

so, the smoke alarm never needed batteries in other apartments?? How does a 55 year old woman not know what that is?

I had the EXACT same thought--what a financially beneficial friendship this is!

The thing about the beeping was so stupid. She's helpless and not very bright.

It's a gorgeous apartment but not at all her speed.

Her whole thing was being clueless at life--no common sense re: finances, refused to develop any practical skills, learn to cook etc. Glad she learned how to sauté a piece of fish but she doesn't have much else to show for the last 30 years. But she's wealthy now, thanks to her marriage, so yay?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seema should know Carrie well enough by now to know that new place was not remotely her. Hope she enjoyed the commission!

so, the smoke alarm never needed batteries in other apartments?? How does a 55 year old woman not know what that is?

I had the EXACT same thought--what a financially beneficial friendship this is!

The thing about the beeping was so stupid. She's helpless and not very bright.

It's a gorgeous apartment but not at all her speed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seema should know Carrie well enough by now to know that new place was not remotely her. Hope she enjoyed the commission!

so, the smoke alarm never needed batteries in other apartments?? How does a 55 year old woman not know what that is?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so strange neither of her friends is at all focused on Steve, possibility of marital counseling etc. The writing is just awful, and not helping flesh out the new additions well either.

Charlotte says “You’re married!” and is immediately crucified by her friends…

Anonymous wrote:Seema should know Carrie well enough by now to know that new place was not remotely her. Hope she enjoyed the commission!

Anonymous wrote:It’s so strange neither of her friends is at all focused on Steve, possibility of marital counseling etc. The writing is just awful, and not helping flesh out the new additions well either.

Anonymous wrote:Seema should know Carrie well enough by now to know that new place was not remotely her. Hope she enjoyed the commission!