Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?
For those not familiar:
Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.
Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.
She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.
What is so scary about his appearance?
His beard and name 😵💫
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.
Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.
She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.
What is so scary about his appearance?
His beard and name 😵💫
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another comment on another board asked if this was a birthday dinner for Nancy as her birthday was 1/27. If it was a birthday dinner, how interesting that none of her friends attended or other family members.
That’s not awfully interesting. 84 is a great age, but not a “milestone” birthday. A dinner at my house is exactly how I expect my own parents would hope to celebrate.
It’s interesting in that if it was planned as a celebration, given her recent birthday, that there were no other guests or witnesses to the dinner. Did she actually make it to the dinner? Was there a dinner?
The uber driver may have picked up a woman, but was it the mother?
They had dinner and played mahjongg. Its not that deep. Don't you do things like this with your family?
We did the exact same thing for my mother in law’s birthday. We had food and cake at my house. No guests, especially since it wasn’t a milestone birthday. This is how most old people celebrate, even ones who have lots of friends. A lot of them don’t want fuss or to make their friends go out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:]Anonymous wrote:If they’re innocent, I hope Annie and her husband sue the hell out of every reporter claiming they’re guilty, especially Banfield. And shame on everyone claiming they’re guilty based on looks.
You cant sue someone for reporting on what a source tells you. Ashleigh is a clickbait reporter but she'll get no repercussions.
Savannah has enough sway in the industry and connections to get her cancelled though.
Maybe SG thinks she's on to something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.
Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.
She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.
What is so scary about his appearance?
Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.
Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.
She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?
For those not familiar:
Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.
Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal
I’m not familiar with Tucson and can’t find much online—what animals can drag away a person? Mountain lion? Pack of wild dogs or feral hogs (pack animals are scary)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?
For those not familiar:
Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.
Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal
I’m not familiar with Tucson and can’t find much online—what animals can drag away a person? Mountain lion? Pack of wild dogs or feral hogs (pack animals are scary)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:]Anonymous wrote:If they’re innocent, I hope Annie and her husband sue the hell out of every reporter claiming they’re guilty, especially Banfield. And shame on everyone claiming they’re guilty based on looks.
You cant sue someone for reporting on what a source tells you. Ashleigh is a clickbait reporter but she'll get no repercussions.
Savannah has enough sway in the industry and connections to get her cancelled though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?
For those not familiar:
Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.
Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another comment on another board asked if this was a birthday dinner for Nancy as her birthday was 1/27. If it was a birthday dinner, how interesting that none of her friends attended or other family members.
That’s not awfully interesting. 84 is a great age, but not a “milestone” birthday. A dinner at my house is exactly how I expect my own parents would hope to celebrate.
It’s interesting in that if it was planned as a celebration, given her recent birthday, that there were no other guests or witnesses to the dinner. Did she actually make it to the dinner? Was there a dinner?
The uber driver may have picked up a woman, but was it the mother?
They had dinner and played mahjongg. Its not that deep. Don't you do things like this with your family?
We did the exact same thing for my mother in law’s birthday. We had food and cake at my house. No guests, especially since it wasn’t a milestone birthday. This is how most old people celebrate, even ones who have lots of friends. A lot of them don’t want fuss or to make their friends go out.
Anonymous wrote:]Anonymous wrote:If they’re innocent, I hope Annie and her husband sue the hell out of every reporter claiming they’re guilty, especially Banfield. And shame on everyone claiming they’re guilty based on looks.
You cant sue someone for reporting on what a source tells you. Ashleigh is a clickbait reporter but she'll get no repercussions.