Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for.
All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial.
Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free.
When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.
Serious crimes? What are the statutes?
So far, I have not seen anyone cite any statutes because, if all of those things that you listed are true, they are not criminal.
Kickback and RICO statutes. It is illegal and a federal felony to exchange anything of value in an effort to encourage political favoritism or preferential treatment.
The fact that Willis awarded a job that has so far paid upwards of $650K to Ward for personal preferential treatment, vacations and gifts. She awarded him a job. He has received over $650K in compensation from that job from the state paid for by public funds. And he has used those funds to lavish her with vacations and gifts. Those are federal felony kick back violations.
No, this does not affect the case against Trump, but both Willis and Ward need to be removed from the case due to their alleged complicitness in federal felonies tied to their behavior in this case. Someone else needs to be appointed to work on the case against Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If all of the allegations are true that she hired someone she is personally connected to, that person has questionable qualifications for the position, paid him more than others in the same position and personally benefited from those funds paid by going on trips he paid for.
All of that, if proven, would constitute serious crimes and if she’s convicted of those crimes everyone convicted in a prosecution she has any involvement with would likely have a strong case to at least receive a new trial.
Many of those cases, due to the amount of time passed, availability of witnesses and other issues would likely not be able to be retried possibly allowing many violent criminals to go free.
When you elect a political hack and possible criminal to be the district attorney bad things happen.
Serious crimes? What are the statutes?
So far, I have not seen anyone cite any statutes because, if all of those things that you listed are true, they are not criminal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This puts Mr. Wade on the spot. If he denies the affair and/or gives any reasons for what caused him to file the divorce, that puts his mistress Fani on the spot having to sit for a deposition.
To save his mistress Fani from having to sit for a deposition, Mr. Wade is going to have to admit to their affair and provide truthful answers to the cause of this filing for divorce that does not contradict anything his wife believes is the cause of the divorce.
Fani claimed in her own motion she knows the details that caused their divorce. If Mr. Wade says anything as to the cause of their divorce that is contrary to what his wife believes the cause is, that sets up Fani as having UNIQUE information about this divorce
None of this has anything to do with Trump's malfeasance, lies, slander and his attempt to steal the election in Georgia.
None of this magically erases Trump's misdeeds.
TBH all of this Fani-Wades stuff needs to be in a totally different thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone thats from Fulton County Georgia has known Fanni and others have been corrupt for years.. This comes as no surprise to anyone.
Lot of her cases need to be reviewed over proper proceedings.
And the nerve of her to stand in the Lords house and lie as she did..
Hopefully she'll be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Anonymous wrote:This puts Mr. Wade on the spot. If he denies the affair and/or gives any reasons for what caused him to file the divorce, that puts his mistress Fani on the spot having to sit for a deposition.
To save his mistress Fani from having to sit for a deposition, Mr. Wade is going to have to admit to their affair and provide truthful answers to the cause of this filing for divorce that does not contradict anything his wife believes is the cause of the divorce.
Fani claimed in her own motion she knows the details that caused their divorce. If Mr. Wade says anything as to the cause of their divorce that is contrary to what his wife believes the cause is, that sets up Fani as having UNIQUE information about this divorce
Anonymous wrote:J6 Committee COLLUDED with Fani Willis Before Charging Trump:
A new report provides more evidence that Fani Willis did in fact collude with Liz Cheney's January 6th Committee prior to indicting Trump. Add this to the White House Visitor's logs and Nathan Wade's billing records, the question becomes who was really running this case?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNr2e33McYY&t=1s