Anonymous wrote:I'm French. Like in most first-world nations, waiting for specialists can be fraught. My father ended up in hospital for two weeks because no specialist could see him and understand his complex medical needs before his health deteriorated to the point where he was admissible to hospital. He lives in Paris, where there is a concentration of specialists!
In rural France, there are medical deserts like in all rural areas of the world. Some villagers with no means of transportation haven't seen a doctor in years. Sometimes mayors of villages organize transport to the nearest health center, or if the village is touristy or has other means to pay, it offers free housing and free office space for doctors to come and settle there. But maternity wards are a particular problem.
If you live in a French city and have uncomplicated medical needs, though, yes, French healthcare and pharmaceuticals are very cheap and good quality. Note that due to the government subsiding costs, some brand medications are not available in France (or indeed, in the EU). Synthroid, my thyroid med, is not available there, because the generic levothyroxine is much cheaper and that's the only one that's distributed. I tried both and prefer Synthroid. The EU and other nations also have stricter drug rules when it comes to controlled substances: Adderall is not legal to prescribe, for example. We traveled with my son's Adderall for years before we realized this!
Anonymous wrote:I'm French. Like in most first-world nations, waiting for specialists can be fraught. My father ended up in hospital for two weeks because no specialist could see him and understand his complex medical needs before his health deteriorated to the point where he was admissible to hospital. He lives in Paris, where there is a concentration of specialists!
In rural France, there are medical deserts like in all rural areas of the world. Some villagers with no means of transportation haven't seen a doctor in years. Sometimes mayors of villages organize transport to the nearest health center, or if the village is touristy or has other means to pay, it offers free housing and free office space for doctors to come and settle there. But maternity wards are a particular problem.
If you live in a French city and have uncomplicated medical needs, though, yes, French healthcare and pharmaceuticals are very cheap and good quality. Note that due to the government subsiding costs, some brand medications are not available in France (or indeed, in the EU). Synthroid, my thyroid med, is not available there, because the generic levothyroxine is much cheaper and that's the only one that's distributed. I tried both and prefer Synthroid. The EU and other nations also have stricter drug rules when it comes to controlled substances: Adderall is not legal to prescribe, for example. We traveled with my son's Adderall for years before we realized this!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They replace it with rationing. Canada, which supposedly is the best socialized medicine, has wait times of over a year for MRI and CT. Many go to Seattle, Michigan, Vermont as an escape valve.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ACA was sold as reducing the cost of healthcare. Now costs have gone up and they want more and more subsidies to cover the premiums.
Of course some of the price increase is because of these same subsidies.
Look at what happened in education. Trump put a limit of $50,000 for student loans, and a college that was charging 65,000 now has lowered tuition to.... 50,000!
So what’s the answer? Huge portions of the country just don’t deserve healthcare? The current Congress is unable to solve the easiest problems these days so what’s the path forward?
Get government out and market forces in.
Competition between the states.
Drop the subsidies. The inherent pricing by insurance companies and medical establishments subsumes all subsidies and prices it right in to the service. So subsidies are like pure gravy to the industry.
If a procedure is $150 and the government tries to lower it by $50, the industry will just price the procedure at $200 (or more).
This is like a treadmill. You're on it and don't know how to get off. So all your answers are just raise the subsidy higher.
Why do insurance companies and medical establishments do this? It's a really simple answer: because they can.
Why doesn't it necessarily work that way in other developed countries with universal health care?
This is not what I've heard from my Canadian friends. They like their healthcare. They have access to the care they need -- every Canadian does.
My parents lived in Canada for a few years and have many friends still there. My mom still talks about how she wishes our system was like Canada's.
Did she live there when she was young and healthy or as an older person who needed more medical care?
Anonymous wrote:I'm French. Like in most first-world nations, waiting for specialists can be fraught. My father ended up in hospital for two weeks because no specialist could see him and understand his complex medical needs before his health deteriorated to the point where he was admissible to hospital. He lives in Paris, where there is a concentration of specialists!
In rural France, there are medical deserts like in all rural areas of the world. Some villagers with no means of transportation haven't seen a doctor in years. Sometimes mayors of villages organize transport to the nearest health center, or if the village is touristy or has other means to pay, it offers free housing and free office space for doctors to come and settle there. But maternity wards are a particular problem.
If you live in a French city and have uncomplicated medical needs, though, yes, French healthcare and pharmaceuticals are very cheap and good quality. Note that due to the government subsiding costs, some brand medications are not available in France (or indeed, in the EU). Synthroid, my thyroid med, is not available there, because the generic levothyroxine is much cheaper and that's the only one that's distributed. I tried both and prefer Synthroid. The EU and other nations also have stricter drug rules when it comes to controlled substances: Adderall is not legal to prescribe, for example. We traveled with my son's Adderall for years before we realized this!
Anonymous wrote:They replace it with rationing. Canada, which supposedly is the best socialized medicine, has wait times of over a year for MRI and CT. Many go to Seattle, Michigan, Vermont as an escape valve.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ACA was sold as reducing the cost of healthcare. Now costs have gone up and they want more and more subsidies to cover the premiums.
Of course some of the price increase is because of these same subsidies.
Look at what happened in education. Trump put a limit of $50,000 for student loans, and a college that was charging 65,000 now has lowered tuition to.... 50,000!
So what’s the answer? Huge portions of the country just don’t deserve healthcare? The current Congress is unable to solve the easiest problems these days so what’s the path forward?
Get government out and market forces in.
Competition between the states.
Drop the subsidies. The inherent pricing by insurance companies and medical establishments subsumes all subsidies and prices it right in to the service. So subsidies are like pure gravy to the industry.
If a procedure is $150 and the government tries to lower it by $50, the industry will just price the procedure at $200 (or more).
This is like a treadmill. You're on it and don't know how to get off. So all your answers are just raise the subsidy higher.
Why do insurance companies and medical establishments do this? It's a really simple answer: because they can.
Why doesn't it necessarily work that way in other developed countries with universal health care?
Anonymous wrote:DP - Anyone who doesn't wish the US had a healthcare system like pretty much all other universal systems the rest of the developed world has is a fool. That's all. Or they've never gotten sick before, have kids or are just filthy rich. Anyone who has a family and lives like a mere mortal understands that no other developed country's healthcare system sucks as much as the US. This isn't even talking about the other scam that is vision and dental care!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ACA was sold as reducing the cost of healthcare. Now costs have gone up and they want more and more subsidies to cover the premiums.
Of course some of the price increase is because of these same subsidies.
Look at what happened in education. Trump put a limit of $50,000 for student loans, and a college that was charging 65,000 now has lowered tuition to.... 50,000!
So what’s the answer? Huge portions of the country just don’t deserve healthcare? The current Congress is unable to solve the easiest problems these days so what’s the path forward?
Get government out and market forces in.
Competition between the states.
Drop the subsidies. The inherent pricing by insurance companies and medical establishments subsumes all subsidies and prices it right in to the service. So subsidies are like pure gravy to the industry.
If a procedure is $150 and the government tries to lower it by $50, the industry will just price the procedure at $200 (or more).
This is like a treadmill. You're on it and don't know how to get off. So all your answers are just raise the subsidy higher.
Why do insurance companies and medical establishments do this? It's a really simple answer: because they can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They replace it with rationing. Canada, which supposedly is the best socialized medicine, has wait times of over a year for MRI and CT. Many go to Seattle, Michigan, Vermont as an escape valve.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ACA was sold as reducing the cost of healthcare. Now costs have gone up and they want more and more subsidies to cover the premiums.
Of course some of the price increase is because of these same subsidies.
Look at what happened in education. Trump put a limit of $50,000 for student loans, and a college that was charging 65,000 now has lowered tuition to.... 50,000!
So what’s the answer? Huge portions of the country just don’t deserve healthcare? The current Congress is unable to solve the easiest problems these days so what’s the path forward?
Get government out and market forces in.
Competition between the states.
Drop the subsidies. The inherent pricing by insurance companies and medical establishments subsumes all subsidies and prices it right in to the service. So subsidies are like pure gravy to the industry.
If a procedure is $150 and the government tries to lower it by $50, the industry will just price the procedure at $200 (or more).
This is like a treadmill. You're on it and don't know how to get off. So all your answers are just raise the subsidy higher.
Why do insurance companies and medical establishments do this? It's a really simple answer: because they can.
Why doesn't it necessarily work that way in other developed countries with universal health care?
This is not what I've heard from my Canadian friends. They like their healthcare. They have access to the care they need -- every Canadian does.
+100
Anonymous wrote:I am Canadian. We do not have the best universal healthcare in the world. Many European countries do it better, like France. However, Canadians would never trade our healthcare for the US system. We may wish to trade it for the French system, which has a nice blend of private and public, but is still universal.
The negatives with the Canadian system are: (1) if your issue is not a threat to your life, there are indeed long wait time, (2) there are thousands of people with no family doctor. Family doctors are not paid well, so there is a severe shortage in almost every province.
The positives are: (1) everyone has access to preventive care (there are walk-in clinics for those without family doctors - not ideal of course), (2) if your life is in danger, the care is very good. My family and I have all had close calls with the grim reaper and we got very good care. My father had complications from diabetes for 30 years, and got excellent care, which greatly expanded his lifespan. The care included subsidized housing, routine foot care, and other routine check-ups.