Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Judge Aileen Cannon is asking the Justice Department and Donald Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta to weigh in on the legality of special counsel Jack Smith's ongoing grand jury activity in Washington, DC, which relates to the obstruction portion of the Mar-a-Lago documents case before her in Florida
She seems to just be trying to run out the clock. Talk about wasting taxpayer dollars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Judge Aileen Cannon is asking the Justice Department and Donald Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta to weigh in on the legality of special counsel Jack Smith's ongoing grand jury activity in Washington, DC, which relates to the obstruction portion of the Mar-a-Lago documents case before her in Florida
She seems to just be trying to run out the clock. Talk about wasting taxpayer dollars.
Anonymous wrote:
Judge Aileen Cannon is asking the Justice Department and Donald Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta to weigh in on the legality of special counsel Jack Smith's ongoing grand jury activity in Washington, DC, which relates to the obstruction portion of the Mar-a-Lago documents case before her in Florida
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.
DRINK
If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.
And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.
Hey MAGAs, why did he lie in his previous testimony? If there was nothing to hide, why did Trump push this guy to perjure himself?
More likely, he didn’t lie but was told he should “tell the truth or the Feds will get him every which way from Sunday”. Because the Feds can. Ask Schumer
Of course dear, he “didn’t lie” about having no memory of this super unusual event. And when you lie in interviews about crimes, cops can get you. In every single police station in America. Not sure how this would be different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.
DRINK
If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.
And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.
Hey MAGAs, why did he lie in his previous testimony? If there was nothing to hide, why did Trump push this guy to perjure himself?
More likely, he didn’t lie but was told he should “tell the truth or the Feds will get him every which way from Sunday”. Because the Feds can. Ask Schumer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.
DRINK
If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.
And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.
Hey MAGAs, why did he lie in his previous testimony? If there was nothing to hide, why did Trump push this guy to perjure himself?
Anonymous wrote:
For people not wanting to give X any clicks:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1694270181567078607.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.
DRINK
If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.
And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jeez. That poor employee 4 is ... not in a good place. All because he worked for Trump. SMH
Zero sympathy for him. Don’t lie when you’re deposed. Especially not in service of Trump. He expects loyalty, but shows none.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.
DRINK
If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Jeez. That poor employee 4 is ... not in a good place. All because he worked for Trump. SMH
Anonymous wrote:Jeez. That poor employee 4 is ... not in a good place. All because he worked for Trump. SMH