Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:33     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:There is absolutely nothing Westfield parents could have done here. The SB and FCPS decided Westfield was going to be the Biggest Loser in the boundary game. There is no rationale otherwise for the decisions they are making. The new Brookfield split feeder is literally like they looked at the map and tried to figure out who to move based on which neighborhoods had the least political/economic power.

Never in other rezonings have they let individual neighborhoods dictate where their kids are going to go to school.


That’s exactly what they just did with Madison and Marshall. It created a ridiculous attendance island. They didn’t care because it shut up Town of Vienna officials and gave people who wanted to bolt Marshall what they wanted.

The numbers involved were much smaller, but moving wealthier families to wealthier schools has the same effect as moving poorer families to poorer schools.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:28     Subject: Re:FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If they had done this properly and stuck to objective standards, this could have been settled months ago. And, with a lot less angst.

In the past, SB members were always non-committal to neighborhoods, while at least pretending to listen. I never recall an earlier superintendent making promises or even getting involved. Staff was involved, but we never saw the superintendents.

It was mostly SB members doing the wheeling and dealing, but they were careful not to make promises.

Reid promised Walney Oaks. Somehow, they were taken totally out of the equation. And, those final scenarios did not include most of Crossfield.

I don't see them changing it now, but the School Board could if they wanted to do so. I don't think they will.



I still wonder if Kyle McDaniel and Melanie Meren will join together at the last minute to strike some sort of deal with everyone else to swap Crossfield and Fox Mill. They both seem pretty adamant about putting Crossfield at Skyview and keeping Fox Mill out.


Why would they do this when it would piss off so many people?


Does a better job of balancing the enrollments at Oakton and South Lakes.

Gets rid of some of the longest commutes to a high school in FCPS.

Does not start to recreate the conditions that led a prior School Board to move kids into South Lakes in 2008.

Relieves overcrowding at Oakton at a time when substantial residential growth is expected closer to OHS.

Keeps families already mostly at an AP school at an AP school.

The path of least resistance is to move Fox Mill but objectively moving Crossfield to Skyview makes more sense. But we have a School Board and superintendent who regularly cater to the loudest voices with the most money.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:26     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:There is absolutely nothing Westfield parents could have done here. The SB and FCPS decided Westfield was going to be the Biggest Loser in the boundary game. There is no rationale otherwise for the decisions they are making. The new Brookfield split feeder is literally like they looked at the map and tried to figure out who to move based on which neighborhoods had the least political/economic power.

Never in other rezonings have they let individual neighborhoods dictate where their kids are going to go to school.


I agree with this. What happened in previous rezonings was the SB member of that area was greatly deferred to. Since she is part of the Reid loving "in" group, she probably personally dictated the last two scenarios. She probably decided on that Brookfield split including Walney Oaks--maybe she didn't realize WO had gotten a special deal from someone else. That's why the map had to be pulled down and edited. She personally decided to move that one apartment area out of Centreville. The other SB members probably don't even know the specifics of where the apartments are, where the SFHes are.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:23     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:There is absolutely nothing Westfield parents could have done here. The SB and FCPS decided Westfield was going to be the Biggest Loser in the boundary game. There is no rationale otherwise for the decisions they are making. The new Brookfield split feeder is literally like they looked at the map and tried to figure out who to move based on which neighborhoods had the least political/economic power.

Never in other rezonings have they let individual neighborhoods dictate where their kids are going to go to school.


Public sentiment is always a part of any boundary review including the comprehensive one that just finished a few months ago.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:22     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They have public-salaried staff who reply to their emails. They don't read their own emails. Seema has no idea and does not care about your opinion.


I met with Seema last summer during the Comprehensive Boundary review and I can tell you aren’t missing anything. She tried to relate to me because her kid moved schools to go to AAP. I had to explain to her that was a choice she made vs the one being forced upon me by FCPS. Everyone should set their party affiliations aside to vote her out of office next time she’s up for reelection.


So her kid went to AAP at Rocky Run? I think that's the center for Liberty MS.

Interesting that her zoned middle school wasn't good enough for her own kid....
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:21     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
There is absolutely nothing Westfield parents could have done here. The SB and FCPS decided Westfield was going to be the Biggest Loser in the boundary game. There is no rationale otherwise for the decisions they are making. The new Brookfield split feeder is literally like they looked at the map and tried to figure out who to move based on which neighborhoods had the least political/economic power.

Never in other rezonings have they let individual neighborhoods dictate where their kids are going to go to school.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:20     Subject: Re:FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If they had done this properly and stuck to objective standards, this could have been settled months ago. And, with a lot less angst.

In the past, SB members were always non-committal to neighborhoods, while at least pretending to listen. I never recall an earlier superintendent making promises or even getting involved. Staff was involved, but we never saw the superintendents.

It was mostly SB members doing the wheeling and dealing, but they were careful not to make promises.

Reid promised Walney Oaks. Somehow, they were taken totally out of the equation. And, those final scenarios did not include most of Crossfield.

I don't see them changing it now, but the School Board could if they wanted to do so. I don't think they will.



I still wonder if Kyle McDaniel and Melanie Meren will join together at the last minute to strike some sort of deal with everyone else to swap Crossfield and Fox Mill. They both seem pretty adamant about putting Crossfield at Skyview and keeping Fox Mill out.


Why would they do this when it would piss off so many people?


McDaniel already said he will not bring forth any amendments to the final scenario as he knows how much work and due diligence FCPS and the consultants have put into it…his words from his call last week not mine. Meren has not been publicly specific about not moving Fox Mill except apparently in a few emails to people on this board. She will at best make a statement and abstain from voting.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:19     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They have public-salaried staff who reply to their emails. They don't read their own emails. Seema has no idea and does not care about your opinion.


I met with Seema last summer during the Comprehensive Boundary review and I can tell you aren’t missing anything. She tried to relate to me because her kid moved schools to go to AAP. I had to explain to her that was a choice she made vs the one being forced upon me by FCPS. Everyone should set their party affiliations aside to vote her out of office next time she’s up for reelection.


So her kid went to AAP at Rocky Run? I think that's the center for Liberty MS.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:18     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why should kids at Stone be stuck in trailers while Rocky Run, right around the corner, is 80% full?


Why are you advocating for split feeders?


Split feeders should be a very low priority.

As everyone but the SB can see, the capacities don't line up. Stone can't be the sole feeder to Westfield. It makes no sense.


Disagree they are low priority.
Not every split feeder situation is equal. Some are kinda OK and some are awful.

Imbalanced split feeders (90% of kids coming from 1 MS, 10% from another) are the worst.


The only split feeder that is OK is the one that benefits my family.

What about the split feeder they created at Brookfield where only the poor kids are segregated out and sent away from their friends to Stone MS--a middle school much farther away than Franklin OR Rocky Run?
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:17     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s pathetic that FCPS would ever suggest it doesn’t have enough resources when it is prepared to empty out a school like Westfield with plenty of capacity or build a school like Dunn Loring that isn’t needed at all. People like Seema Dixit and Karl Frisch are complete scum. Send her back to India and send him back to California.


Look, I don't like either of them either, but I see your true colors here you racist, xenophobic, homophobic pig.


California is another culture now?


Oh please. You (or that PP if it wasn't you) are the same person that goes on and on about Karl Frisch being gay and not having children.


When you’re willing to spend many millions on a school that doesn’t need to be built, as is Frisch, you’re also willing to play fast and loose with boundaries. He does not care about kids or education. He tried to bolt the School Board as soon as he could for a seat in the state legislature, but he lost.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:16     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Seema lives in one of the nicer SFH areas zoned to Bull Run-Liberty-Centreville that was repeatedly moved to Westfield under almost all the scenarios.

She designated an apartment building to be moved out of her MS and HS and kept the rest of the Bull Run split feeder going to Liberty/Centreville.

No one has been able to figure out why Walney Oaks is being treated like VIPs.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:14     Subject: Re:FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If they had done this properly and stuck to objective standards, this could have been settled months ago. And, with a lot less angst.

In the past, SB members were always non-committal to neighborhoods, while at least pretending to listen. I never recall an earlier superintendent making promises or even getting involved. Staff was involved, but we never saw the superintendents.

It was mostly SB members doing the wheeling and dealing, but they were careful not to make promises.

Reid promised Walney Oaks. Somehow, they were taken totally out of the equation. And, those final scenarios did not include most of Crossfield.

I don't see them changing it now, but the School Board could if they wanted to do so. I don't think they will.



I still wonder if Kyle McDaniel and Melanie Meren will join together at the last minute to strike some sort of deal with everyone else to swap Crossfield and Fox Mill. They both seem pretty adamant about putting Crossfield at Skyview and keeping Fox Mill out.


Why would they do this when it would piss off so many people?
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:09     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s pathetic that FCPS would ever suggest it doesn’t have enough resources when it is prepared to empty out a school like Westfield with plenty of capacity or build a school like Dunn Loring that isn’t needed at all. People like Seema Dixit and Karl Frisch are complete scum. Send her back to India and send him back to California.


Look, I don't like either of them either, but I see your true colors here you racist, xenophobic, homophobic pig.


California is another culture now?


Oh please. You (or that PP if it wasn't you) are the same person that goes on and on about Karl Frisch being gay and not having children.


I haven’t said anything about either of them before.
But you must think India and California are not good, otherwise why be triggered?
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:06     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s pathetic that FCPS would ever suggest it doesn’t have enough resources when it is prepared to empty out a school like Westfield with plenty of capacity or build a school like Dunn Loring that isn’t needed at all. People like Seema Dixit and Karl Frisch are complete scum. Send her back to India and send him back to California.


Look, I don't like either of them either, but I see your true colors here you racist, xenophobic, homophobic pig.


California is another culture now?


Oh please. You (or that PP if it wasn't you) are the same person that goes on and on about Karl Frisch being gay and not having children.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 08:05     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:Seema is the only SB member who flat out ignored me, and I live in Sully and have three kids in FCPS.

I got canned responses back from everyone else.

How are the Walney Oaks and RIO people getting in person meetings? I'm baffled.


RIO has an actual lobbyist as part of the group and is using political connections to get meetings/wheel and deal. They also have a member who works at Gatehouse and used that connection to meet with Reid and her staff. I assume Walney was easy because Seema lives there.