Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will not go to trial if they have the goods on him. There is no point. He will get sentenced. He is falling under the eo13818. Forwarding imagery of naked minors is a Federal offense. He needs to plea and do what he can to avoid harming his family. Asset seizure is something on the table. Draining family resources to pay a lawyer to fight this is not helping his situation.

Sounds like there may not be many assets there since they were being kicked out of a rental and he's using a public defender.

They weren’t being kicked out because they weren’t paying the rent, the owner wanted to take back the property, claiming they wanted to live there again, but it’s suspected that they just wanted to sell it. Nothing to do with lack of payments from their end.

It's pretty entitled of renters to stay in a house that they don't own when they know the owners want them out. Regardless of the reason.

Tenants have a lot of rights in DC. There is nothing unusual about Carroll family actions in this instance. Perv yes.

he has a family???? I assumed he was a single gay man. does he have children???

Nice. You realize how obnoxious that is to make that assumption and then to actually write it?

I thought the same thing. She’s basically equating gay people with child molestors. Horrible.

If you read his Discord handle, you’ll realize PP was not making assumptions.

Exactly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will not go to trial if they have the goods on him. There is no point. He will get sentenced. He is falling under the eo13818. Forwarding imagery of naked minors is a Federal offense. He needs to plea and do what he can to avoid harming his family. Asset seizure is something on the table. Draining family resources to pay a lawyer to fight this is not helping his situation.

Sounds like there may not be many assets there since they were being kicked out of a rental and he's using a public defender.

They weren’t being kicked out because they weren’t paying the rent, the owner wanted to take back the property, claiming they wanted to live there again, but it’s suspected that they just wanted to sell it. Nothing to do with lack of payments from their end.

It's pretty entitled of renters to stay in a house that they don't own when they know the owners want them out. Regardless of the reason.

Tenants have a lot of rights in DC. There is nothing unusual about Carroll family actions in this instance. Perv yes.

he has a family???? I assumed he was a single gay man. does he have children???

Nice. You realize how obnoxious that is to make that assumption and then to actually write it?

I thought the same thing. She’s basically equating gay people with child molestors. Horrible.

If you read his Discord handle, you’ll realize PP was not making assumptions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will not go to trial if they have the goods on him. There is no point. He will get sentenced. He is falling under the eo13818. Forwarding imagery of naked minors is a Federal offense. He needs to plea and do what he can to avoid harming his family. Asset seizure is something on the table. Draining family resources to pay a lawyer to fight this is not helping his situation.

Sounds like there may not be many assets there since they were being kicked out of a rental and he's using a public defender.

Read the thread, low info poster.

The landlord wants to re-possess and occupy the property. The action is NOT for non-payment.

Public defenders are common in these cases, see Eleanor Hoppe thread. They are also very experienced.

Public defenders are not common for these cases unless the defendant is living in poverty which JC is obviously not. There’s an entire cottage industry of attorneys in the DC area that represent accused pedophiles with little notice on far lighter charges than these.

You are absolutely incorrect. Court appointed counsel (FPD or CJA) are common in these cases and you do not have to be living in poverty. Just need to show you cannot afford an experienced attorney.

You are incorrect. I have testified in support of child victims in preliminary hearings in which the pedo was represented by a billboard attorney. This was his professional focus. How many child victims have you stood up for in court?

Federal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will not go to trial if they have the goods on him. There is no point. He will get sentenced. He is falling under the eo13818. Forwarding imagery of naked minors is a Federal offense. He needs to plea and do what he can to avoid harming his family. Asset seizure is something on the table. Draining family resources to pay a lawyer to fight this is not helping his situation.

Sounds like there may not be many assets there since they were being kicked out of a rental and he's using a public defender.

Read the thread, low info poster.

The landlord wants to re-possess and occupy the property. The action is NOT for non-payment.

Public defenders are common in these cases, see Eleanor Hoppe thread. They are also very experienced.

Public defenders are not common for these cases unless the defendant is living in poverty which JC is obviously not. There’s an entire cottage industry of attorneys in the DC area that represent accused pedophiles with little notice on far lighter charges than these.

You are absolutely incorrect. Court appointed counsel (FPD or CJA) are common in these cases and you do not have to be living in poverty. Just need to show you cannot afford an experienced attorney.

You are incorrect. I have testified in support of child victims in preliminary hearings in which the pedo was represented by a billboard attorney. This was his professional focus. How many child victims have you stood up for in court?

Anonymous wrote:He has been at NCRC since 2018; in looking at the school's 990's, James Carroll just got a salary increase from 199k to 270k over the past year; the school should claw back his salary.

That’s quite a salary!

I wonder how many years the camera footage goes back? Does anyone know?

Does everyone realize that NCRC has cctv recoding in all of the classrooms? If something happened at the school, they will easily be able to find out!

Anonymous wrote:2:20, Evil child sex abusers are virtually never rehabilitated.

Why would you ever want them released?

Many are not released. Civil commitment is real and robust in this country. And constitutional according to SCOTUS.

2:20, Evil child sex abusers are virtually never rehabilitated.

Why would you ever want them released?

Anonymous wrote:He will never be rehabilitated. I assume if he ever gets out of prison, he will return to England to live out his final years. It’s a small comfort, but prison is not a pleasant place for child molesters.

Sorry, can’t let that pass without comment: braying for people (even people who have commited awful crimes and richly deserve to be in prison for a long time) behind bars to be sexually assaulted (which, let’s face it, is what you were doing) is wrong and you should be ashamed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will not go to trial if they have the goods on him. There is no point. He will get sentenced. He is falling under the eo13818. Forwarding imagery of naked minors is a Federal offense. He needs to plea and do what he can to avoid harming his family. Asset seizure is something on the table. Draining family resources to pay a lawyer to fight this is not helping his situation.

Sounds like there may not be many assets there since they were being kicked out of a rental and he's using a public defender.

Read the thread, low info poster.

The landlord wants to re-possess and occupy the property. The action is NOT for non-payment.

Public defenders are common in these cases, see Eleanor Hoppe thread. They are also very experienced.

Public defenders are not common for these cases unless the defendant is living in poverty which JC is obviously not. There’s an entire cottage industry of attorneys in the DC area that represent accused pedophiles with little notice on far lighter charges than these.

You are absolutely incorrect. Court appointed counsel (FPD or CJA) are common in these cases and you do not have to be living in poverty. Just need to show you cannot afford an experienced attorney.

Anonymous wrote:He punted to December 18th. Remaining behind bars. Has a public defender.

Wonder what is happening behind bars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will not go to trial if they have the goods on him. There is no point. He will get sentenced. He is falling under the eo13818. Forwarding imagery of naked minors is a Federal offense. He needs to plea and do what he can to avoid harming his family. Asset seizure is something on the table. Draining family resources to pay a lawyer to fight this is not helping his situation.

Sounds like there may not be many assets there since they were being kicked out of a rental and he's using a public defender.

Read the thread, low info poster.

The landlord wants to re-possess and occupy the property. The action is NOT for non-payment.

Public defenders are common in these cases, see Eleanor Hoppe thread. They are also very experienced.

Public defenders are not common for these cases unless the defendant is living in poverty which JC is obviously not. There’s an entire cottage industry of attorneys in the DC area that represent accused pedophiles with little notice on far lighter charges than these.

Maybe he’s doing the honorable thing and knows he’s guilty and doesn’t want to bankrupt his wife and kids to fight charges he can’t beat.

He will never be rehabilitated. I assume if he ever gets out of prison, he will return to England to live out his final years. It’s a small comfort, but prison is not a pleasant place for child molesters.

Anonymous wrote:I’m not a lawyer, but I hope that the fact that he had close access to children of the wealthy and powerful, translates into a longer sentence for him like life in prison. That’s what he deserves.

Wow. So people that sexually abuse poor kids should get less time? Wtf?! You are horrible to say such things.