Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think so, for 25-26 season there are two 2014 Academy I teams, white and silver. White is the top team, no question.
If that were true, that is just really sad and kinda pathetic.
Assuming that is the reason, then I agree--pathetic. But there may be one other reason focused on development--some clubs at U12 will have two Academy I (Boys) or Pre-ECNL (Girls) teams so that both can play 11v11 in their Spring season. I don't see a problem with that as along as expectations are set for the kids--and an 11v11 between those two teams in that Spring league would probably make it clear, but still give both teams a chance to get ready for U13. Of course, it assumes that the second team is strong enough to compete. Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think so, for 25-26 season there are two 2014 Academy I teams, white and silver. White is the top team, no question.
If that were true, that is just really sad and kinda pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Haaaahahahahahahahahahaha. Pulisic won 8-0. That’s why JC ordered not to publish
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is Pulisic 1 and McKennie 2 or viceversa?
I think they tried to balance the 2016s pretty evenly, you will probably see that they struggle against top teams this coming year because BSC doesn't have enough depth to have two teams compete against the top clubs in the region. They played each other in final of the Bethesda tournament in fall 2024. I think Pulisic dominated but interestingly the final score was never posted. Imagine a large tournament that doesn't post the score of a final? Can only be one reason, BC and JC.
🤦 Are you really flexing on a U9 win?
OMG…This is why they don’t post scores.
This is why the US struggles to development players.
The scores and winning do not matter until age 15 to scouts.
Go read an Eckharte Tolle book and get grounded on something other than the results of your child’s team.
Anonymous wrote:Yes these threads are even more unhinged than usual lately 😬
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Haaaahahahahahahahahahaha. Pulisic won 8-0. That’s why JC ordered not to publish
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is Pulisic 1 and McKennie 2 or viceversa?
I think they tried to balance the 2016s pretty evenly, you will probably see that they struggle against top teams this coming year because BSC doesn't have enough depth to have two teams compete against the top clubs in the region. They played each other in final of the Bethesda tournament in fall 2024. I think Pulisic dominated but interestingly the final score was never posted. Imagine a large tournament that doesn't post the score of a final? Can only be one reason, BC and JC.
🤦 Are you really flexing on a U9 win?
OMG…This is why they don’t post scores.
This is why the US struggles to development players.
The scores and winning do not matter until age 15 to scouts.
Go read an Eckharte Tolle book and get grounded on something other than the results of your child’s team.
Anonymous wrote:Haaaahahahahahahahahahaha. Pulisic won 8-0. That’s why JC ordered not to publish
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is Pulisic 1 and McKennie 2 or viceversa?
I think they tried to balance the 2016s pretty evenly, you will probably see that they struggle against top teams this coming year because BSC doesn't have enough depth to have two teams compete against the top clubs in the region. They played each other in final of the Bethesda tournament in fall 2024. I think Pulisic dominated but interestingly the final score was never posted. Imagine a large tournament that doesn't post the score of a final? Can only be one reason, BC and JC.
Anonymous wrote:Haaaahahahahahahahahahaha. Pulisic won 8-0. That’s why JC ordered not to publish
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is Pulisic 1 and McKennie 2 or viceversa?
I think they tried to balance the 2016s pretty evenly, you will probably see that they struggle against top teams this coming year because BSC doesn't have enough depth to have two teams compete against the top clubs in the region. They played each other in final of the Bethesda tournament in fall 2024. I think Pulisic dominated but interestingly the final score was never posted. Imagine a large tournament that doesn't post the score of a final? Can only be one reason, BC and JC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is Pulisic 1 and McKennie 2 or viceversa?
I think they tried to balance the 2016s pretty evenly, you will probably see that they struggle against top teams this coming year because BSC doesn't have enough depth to have two teams compete against the top clubs in the region. They played each other in final of the Bethesda tournament in fall 2024. I think Pulisic dominated but interestingly the final score was never posted. Imagine a large tournament that doesn't post the score of a final? Can only be one reason, BC and JC.
Anonymous wrote:It isn’t just that.
The kids and their parents are both very ambitious and very competitive. They want to develop and win. Is that so bad?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think so, for 25-26 season there are two 2014 Academy I teams, white and silver. White is the top team, no question.
If that were true, that is just really sad and kinda pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:It isn’t just that.
The kids and their parents are both very ambitious and very competitive. They want to develop and win. Is that so bad?
Anonymous wrote:So is Pulisic 1 and McKennie 2 or viceversa?
Anonymous wrote:So is Pulisic 1 and McKennie 2 or viceversa?