Anonymous wrote:Pvi over BI 15-11
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do want this to stop, but am curious about inclusive academic standards at SJC. What does that even mean??
I guess it means that the acceptance rate is higher than Potomac's or Sidwell's; maybe a bit higher than Visi's. 1200 applications for 350 spots is not bad for a high school. No clue what it means relative to GC or SR...
The admissions standards at SJC and GV are not really all that comparable. GV accepts at a lower rate, and they are getting more accomplished applicants. SJC has really improved though.
If you compare the schools the kids are attending you’ll find it’s pretty even.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The experience these girls had playing at Georgetown Stadium was something to remember. The stands were packed - something you rarely see at girls' high school lacrosse. For SJC, many former lax players were there supporting their team (what up Stella Shea, Harvard '27), families, alumni and friends on both sides. Very young laxer girls with GC t-shirts on cheering them on the lady Falcons. Spirit bands on both sides. SJC ran out of steam, but the fans were excited for those girls to have gotten this far for the first time in program history. Lots of sad faces, but they should revel in the moment. GC is exceptional - hands down (and no i don't need any back and forth on the coach or how they play or how they recruit or any of it). But, it was a great day for girls' sports. As a parent initially there to see the boys game, it was so great to see the girls front and center. And to think that girls on both of those rosters in the class of '24 will see one another again next season at the college level. Hail to women in sports! The '24 talent was exceptional on both sides.
GC also had many alums that are current collegiate players in the stands, not sure why you only singled out SJC?
Anonymous wrote:The experience these girls had playing at Georgetown Stadium was something to remember. The stands were packed - something you rarely see at girls' high school lacrosse. For SJC, many former lax players were there supporting their team (what up Stella Shea, Harvard '27), families, alumni and friends on both sides. Very young laxer girls with GC t-shirts on cheering them on the lady Falcons. Spirit bands on both sides. SJC ran out of steam, but the fans were excited for those girls to have gotten this far for the first time in program history. Lots of sad faces, but they should revel in the moment. GC is exceptional - hands down (and no i don't need any back and forth on the coach or how they play or how they recruit or any of it). But, it was a great day for girls' sports. As a parent initially there to see the boys game, it was so great to see the girls front and center. And to think that girls on both of those rosters in the class of '24 will see one another again next season at the college level. Hail to women in sports! The '24 talent was exceptional on both sides.
Anonymous wrote:Is there anywhere to watch the replay of the GC game yesterday?
Anonymous wrote:Three girls from local schools starting on Yale elite 8 team. One is also the captain. Not too shabby.
Anonymous wrote:LB. 10-4 GC. I'm calling it. Air came out of SJC's tires on that quarter. GC making the most of every opp, SJC not so much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do want this to stop, but am curious about inclusive academic standards at SJC. What does that even mean??
I guess it means that the acceptance rate is higher than Potomac's or Sidwell's; maybe a bit higher than Visi's. 1200 applications for 350 spots is not bad for a high school. No clue what it means relative to GC or SR...
The admissions standards at SJC and GV are not really all that comparable. GV accepts at a lower rate, and they are getting more accomplished applicants. SJC has really improved though.