Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The tj changes could increase demand for Langley.
True. More children who won't get into TJ will be going to their zoned school, and a fair number used to come from Langley if I am recalling it right.
It’s not just that. It’s also the families that will now decide the sure thing of a Langley is a better bet than taking a chance on an increasingly subjective admissions process at TJ.
Some Langley/Great Falls kids could be moved to south lakes as well. Some Great Falls kids used to go there in the 80’s too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tysons will overcrowd Marshall with all the new development. I would guess Marshall kids could be moved to McLean, McLean kids to Langley, Langley kids to Herndon.
It's also possible that Marshall kids in Vienna would get moved to Madison, which had slightly over 2200 kids last year (which included over 100 students transfers from other pyramids) but is being expanded to 2500 seats. There isn't nearly as much development in Vienna as in Tysons so Madison might have room.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The tj changes could increase demand for Langley.
True. More children who won't get into TJ will be going to their zoned school, and a fair number used to come from Langley if I am recalling it right.
Anonymous wrote:The tj changes could increase demand for Langley.
Anonymous wrote:so in 10 years there may 50 more kids in the HSAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From what I can tell, the disruption always falls on someone else's shoulders, never Langley.
Even our SB is not going to let Langley's enrollment go down that much. It's already pretty low.
Link? With some prior McLean neighborhoods now attending, plus the new development on Rt. 7/Towlston, there is no way Langley's enrollment is "low."
How many kids went from McLean? Langley's enrollment was under 2000 last year. I'm guessing that with people going to private because of COVID, it could be lower this year (not counting the new kids) I'm not familiar with the area--how large is the new development and is it multi-family or single family?
The Toll Bros. development is 102 single-family houses.
so in 10 years there may 50 more kids in the HSAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From what I can tell, the disruption always falls on someone else's shoulders, never Langley.
Even our SB is not going to let Langley's enrollment go down that much. It's already pretty low.
Link? With some prior McLean neighborhoods now attending, plus the new development on Rt. 7/Towlston, there is no way Langley's enrollment is "low."
How many kids went from McLean? Langley's enrollment was under 2000 last year. I'm guessing that with people going to private because of COVID, it could be lower this year (not counting the new kids) I'm not familiar with the area--how large is the new development and is it multi-family or single family?
The Toll Bros. development is 102 single-family houses.
Anonymous wrote:How many kids went from McLean? Langley's enrollment was under 2000 last year. I'm guessing that with people going to private because of COVID, it could be lower this year (not counting the new kids) I'm not familiar with the area--how large is the new development and is it multi-family or single family?
The Toll Bros. development is 102 single-family houses.
Back in the day, FCPS had a formula to predict number of kids. I'm guessing 50-75 max. and probably less. Any kids won't all be in high school at the same time
Anonymous wrote:Tysons will overcrowd Marshall with all the new development. I would guess Marshall kids could be moved to McLean, McLean kids to Langley, Langley kids to Herndon.
Anonymous wrote:Tysons will overcrowd Marshall with all the new development. I would guess Marshall kids could be moved to McLean, McLean kids to Langley, Langley kids to Herndon.
How many kids went from McLean? Langley's enrollment was under 2000 last year. I'm guessing that with people going to private because of COVID, it could be lower this year (not counting the new kids) I'm not familiar with the area--how large is the new development and is it multi-family or single family?
The Toll Bros. development is 102 single-family houses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When schools increase in diversity, it benefits every single child in that school.
Completely incorrect.
+100000, it often benefits no one.
I’m getting a good feel now for the mindset that made sure no apartments ended up at Langley.
Elaine Tholen must be so proud that her biggest fans think diversity is bad.
DP.
I have no problem with diversity. Langley is an incredibly diverse school, but no one wants to acknowledge that because apparently it’s not the “right” kind of diversity. I *do* have a problem with the social engineering that many of you would love to make happen. Sorry, when you have to bus kids in in order to fulfill certain “diversity” requirements, there is a big problem. Not interested in being a part of your bizarre fantasies.
There are kids being bussed 14.5 miles to Langley. Surely that is its own form of "social engineering"?
So you’d prefer they attend the closet school - WHICH IS OVERCROWDED? Please explain how this would help HHS. We’ll wait.
Herndon is being expanded to 2500 seats and had an enrollment under 2200 for most of last year. Seems like there's space, or will be soon (and that doesn't take into account the additional seats that might open up later at HHS if a new school is built).
Perhaps you've seen the writing on the wall, and don't like it. Good luck with your next effort to replace the entire School Board.
![]()
I don't care one way or the other if anyone is redistricted to Herndon or not. It wouldn't affect me, either way. The fact is, however, that it's extremely unlikely and this constant beating the drum about a very unlikely prospect, years away, makes you look... unstable, to say the least.
And yet you keep posting, constantly.
It doesn't merely border on the pathological to keep predicting the outcome of things you don't control, as if you had a crystal ball. Rather, it betrays some deep, and very obvious, insecurity on your part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what boundaries are being considered for change?
Assuming NOT Langley since they just had a boundary adjustment.
The school is years out. They don't even have a site yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From what I can tell, the disruption always falls on someone else's shoulders, never Langley.
Even our SB is not going to let Langley's enrollment go down that much. It's already pretty low.
Link? With some prior McLean neighborhoods now attending, plus the new development on Rt. 7/Towlston, there is no way Langley's enrollment is "low."
How many kids went from McLean? Langley's enrollment was under 2000 last year. I'm guessing that with people going to private because of COVID, it could be lower this year (not counting the new kids) I'm not familiar with the area--how large is the new development and is it multi-family or single family?