Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey, crazy libs----you are such freaking hypocrites! The party of tolerance is only tolerant towards those that agree with them. I for one have a freshman daughter in a private college in TX and am ecstatic about the Supreme Court decision.

Hope she doesn’t get raped, take the abortion pill, have an incomplete abortion and be unable to go to a hospital. And die. And yes, it could happen to your daughter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is designed to go after the providers. The back alley type abortions will continue as they always have and always will. You simply are not going to force pregnancies and births on woman that for any number of very good reasons are not going to go through with that pregnancy. This movie has been seen already

If they try to go after the patients that leave the state to get the help they need, there are going to be enormous problems

But the "they" is not a court or law enforcement, but any citizen who takes it up themselves to get into people's business in order to get their 10k. Think of the new version of "ambulance chaser" lawyers--hanging out in pharmacies lurking in the pregnancy test aisles to get potential people to monitor to potentially sue. This was the bargain they made so their clearly unconstitutional law can't be challenged in courts. Since the majority of the people in this country support a women's right to choose, they couldn't go for the it directly--instead they went for a workaround 'vigilante justice" approach. Nuts!!

Is it nuts and I think they risk getting vigilantied right back at them.

Maybe. But the majority of women are going to be on their own (no one to aid and abet right?), in a tough personal situation. And there are going to be people who make a regular practice of this. I think these young women are going to be extremely vulnerable to being raped as well (I won't sue you if you ...). Empowering vigilantes to harass women--and there are people on this board that are ecstatic about this? I am truly sickened by the lack of any moral core.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is designed to go after the providers. The back alley type abortions will continue as they always have and always will. You simply are not going to force pregnancies and births on woman that for any number of very good reasons are not going to go through with that pregnancy. This movie has been seen already

If they try to go after the patients that leave the state to get the help they need, there are going to be enormous problems

But the "they" is not a court or law enforcement, but any citizen who takes it up themselves to get into people's business in order to get their 10k. Think of the new version of "ambulance chaser" lawyers--hanging out in pharmacies lurking in the pregnancy test aisles to get potential people to monitor to potentially sue. This was the bargain they made so their clearly unconstitutional law can't be challenged in courts. Since the majority of the people in this country support a women's right to choose, they couldn't go for the it directly--instead they went for a workaround 'vigilante justice" approach. Nuts!!

Is it nuts and I think they risk getting vigilantied right back at them.

Anonymous wrote:For those of you really concerned about this law.. Read on and see how you can participate.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3x9ba/tiktok-texas-abortion-law-bot-site-ios-shortcut

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is designed to go after the providers. The back alley type abortions will continue as they always have and always will. You simply are not going to force pregnancies and births on woman that for any number of very good reasons are not going to go through with that pregnancy. This movie has been seen already

If they try to go after the patients that leave the state to get the help they need, there are going to be enormous problems

But the "they" is not a court or law enforcement, but any citizen who takes it up themselves to get into people's business in order to get their 10k. Think of the new version of "ambulance chaser" lawyers--hanging out in pharmacies lurking in the pregnancy test aisles to get potential people to monitor to potentially sue. This was the bargain they made so their clearly unconstitutional law can't be challenged in courts. Since the majority of the people in this country support a women's right to choose, they couldn't go for the it directly--instead they went for a workaround 'vigilante justice" approach. Nuts!!

Anonymous wrote:Just here to say to any fellow Virginians—make sure you vote in the upcoming gubernatorial election in Nov. The Republican candidate is just as looney as the rest of the GOP.

Anonymous wrote:Hey, crazy libs----you are such freaking hypocrites! The party of tolerance is only tolerant towards those that agree with them. I for one have a freshman daughter in a private college in TX and am ecstatic about the Supreme Court decision.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pressure texas corporations to fight back or get out of there

they don't care. The calculus is simple- the corporations want favorable tax/employment/environmental (especially the energy companies) laws and regulations, so they support republicans. For republicans to get elected, they need the christian base so you get politicians who oppose abortion, but also oppose taxes and unions. That's a win for business

Make them care. They can't function without customers. I don't have to give mo ey to exxon if I can help it.

who are you shifting purchases too that doesn't have offices in Texas?

It's going to be really difficult to avoid oil & gas purchases that aren't Houston based.

Focus on IT & air - Dell, Tesla, Southwest, American Airlines, AT&T

Great. I'm going to fly one-way down to Texas on AA to buy a dell computer. While down there, I'll rent a tesla. Then fly back Southwest. All while traveling with my AT&T cell phone. Thanks for letting me know!

Seriously--are you in favor of deputizing private citizens to sue people they think got an abortion, drove someone to get an abortion, etc.??? Citizens who are free to carry guns without permits or training???? Do you not see how women are going to be seriously harassed here? On what grounds do you think this is a good idea?

But you're in support of men going into female bathrooms and locker rooms? Man, this country is ass backwards on both sides of the aisle.

Anonymous wrote:This is designed to go after the providers. The back alley type abortions will continue as they always have and always will. You simply are not going to force pregnancies and births on woman that for any number of very good reasons are not going to go through with that pregnancy. This movie has been seen already

If they try to go after the patients that leave the state to get the help they need, there are going to be enormous problems

Anonymous wrote:Will you encourage your daughters or sons to apply to any college or university in Texas now?