Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Asking folks to be cautious is not being controlling. It’s interesting that it’s being contorted into that freedumb motif.

Your version of cautious is insane. It's fine if you want to live that way but not everyone has the same version of cautious. It's a free country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:About half of the people i talk to have done some sort of high risk behavior. Flying to a wedding. Driving to legoland. Going to Busch gardens, Dutch Wonderland, etc. others judge while getting their hair and nails done. Some criticize others flying while they have indoor and outdoor gatherings weekly.

Stop with the judging. So annoying.

Exactly - these people - including the judgmental ones in this thread - justify what they do & judge what others do.

I don’t know who you’re talking to. We aren’t doing any of those things. I do think the person that went to Florida and the U.S. Open person on here are pretty trashy though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ask your kids teachers how they feel about you coming back from Florida this week.

The teachers I know screaming about going back are not being cautious so I am loosing all empathy we had for them last year. If its safe for you to travel this summer, its safe for you to go back. But, that is why we are going virtual.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:About half of the people i talk to have done some sort of high risk behavior. Flying to a wedding. Driving to legoland. Going to Busch gardens, Dutch Wonderland, etc. others judge while getting their hair and nails done. Some criticize others flying while they have indoor and outdoor gatherings weekly.

Stop with the judging. So annoying.

Exactly - these people - including the judgmental ones in this thread - justify what they do & judge what others do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ask your kids teachers how they feel about you coming back from Florida this week.

The teachers I know screaming about going back are not being cautious so I am loosing all empathy we had for them last year. If its safe for you to travel this summer, its safe for you to go back. But, that is why we are going virtual.

Anonymous wrote:About half of the people i talk to have done some sort of high risk behavior. Flying to a wedding. Driving to legoland. Going to Busch gardens, Dutch Wonderland, etc. others judge while getting their hair and nails done. Some criticize others flying while they have indoor and outdoor gatherings weekly.

Stop with the judging. So annoying.

Anonymous wrote:Ask your kids teachers how they feel about you coming back from Florida this week.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are misunderstanding- she said ok to travel LOL. Unlike OP. So no reason for DCUM posters to be even more conservative than Leana wen was my point.

It’s OK to travel, but not up until the minute school begins. you don’t get back on Sunday night and start class on Monday. Common sense.

If you drove and did outdoor activities - I see no problem with it.

Are you peeing in the woods and taking all of your own food, staying in a tent? Electric car on full charge? At some point you’re moving from no contact to excessive contact in any type of travel. So yeah, there is a problem with it if we’re trying to get out kids in school. So even up to two weeks ago (or two weeks before your district went back) maybe all of that would’ve been OK. But at some point you have to say hey don’t travel past this date if we want our kids in school.

Could you maybe consider that it’s not necessarily about being right or wrong or someone is saying you’re a bad person and that it’s just not thinking through the impact on other people?

This attitude - any contact is excessive contact - is really nuts.

Plus, you know, a lot of kids were in camp this summer. So what, the PP thinks it's fine for her to travel and potentially infect the kids who are going to camp, but not ok for other people to travel and potentially infect the kids who are going to camp. Talk about a double standard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are misunderstanding- she said ok to travel LOL. Unlike OP. So no reason for DCUM posters to be even more conservative than Leana wen was my point.

It’s OK to travel, but not up until the minute school begins. you don’t get back on Sunday night and start class on Monday. Common sense.

If you drove and did outdoor activities - I see no problem with it.

Are you peeing in the woods and taking all of your own food, staying in a tent? Electric car on full charge? At some point you’re moving from no contact to excessive contact in any type of travel. So yeah, there is a problem with it if we’re trying to get out kids in school. So even up to two weeks ago (or two weeks before your district went back) maybe all of that would’ve been OK. But at some point you have to say hey don’t travel past this date if we want our kids in school.

Could you maybe consider that it’s not necessarily about being right or wrong or someone is saying you’re a bad person and that it’s just not thinking through the impact on other people?

This attitude - any contact is excessive contact - is really nuts.

Plus, you know, a lot of kids were in camp this summer. So what, the PP thinks it's fine for her to travel and potentially infect the kids who are going to camp, but not ok for other people to travel and potentially infect the kids who are going to school. Talk about a double standard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are misunderstanding- she said ok to travel LOL. Unlike OP. So no reason for DCUM posters to be even more conservative than Leana wen was my point.

It’s OK to travel, but not up until the minute school begins. you don’t get back on Sunday night and start class on Monday. Common sense.

If you drove and did outdoor activities - I see no problem with it.

Are you peeing in the woods and taking all of your own food, staying in a tent? Electric car on full charge? At some point you’re moving from no contact to excessive contact in any type of travel. So yeah, there is a problem with it if we’re trying to get out kids in school. So even up to two weeks ago (or two weeks before your district went back) maybe all of that would’ve been OK. But at some point you have to say hey don’t travel past this date if we want our kids in school.

Could you maybe consider that it’s not necessarily about being right or wrong or someone is saying you’re a bad person and that it’s just not thinking through the impact on other people?

This attitude - any contact is excessive contact - is really nuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ask your kids teachers how they feel about you coming back from Florida this week.

They’re probably there too.

So true. Not to mention all the people cramming into Rehoboth this long weekend. And the people dining out or going to the gym locally.