Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These encampments are third world country stuff. How can people mentally convince themselves that allowing them and supporting them is somehow just and right that people who oppose them are evil and bad?
The next logical step is that once the tents get blown down in a winter storm, they get replaced with plywood and sheet metal roofs and on and on. Next thing we know we have a real shantytown.
Actually, a big part of why we have this crises is that inexpensive housing has been outlawed. It used to be if you were poor, you’d build a crappy little house. To even get a building permit to do anything in dc takes substantial wealth and sophistication. This is a historical anomaly.
But yes, I agree with you. I do think the root causes are in safety-Ism (excessive building codes) and nimbyism (excessive permitting procedures).
There's tons of inexpensive housing in America. How many of these people in parks are historically from DC? I'd like to see a statistic on that.
2nd, as DC launches the most expensive re-housing the homeless effort in the nation, what is to keep folks from moving here specifically for their free house? Or will we just "tax the rich" and encourage them to come?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These encampments are third world country stuff. How can people mentally convince themselves that allowing them and supporting them is somehow just and right that people who oppose them are evil and bad?
The next logical step is that once the tents get blown down in a winter storm, they get replaced with plywood and sheet metal roofs and on and on. Next thing we know we have a real shantytown.
Actually, a big part of why we have this crises is that inexpensive housing has been outlawed. It used to be if you were poor, you’d build a crappy little house. To even get a building permit to do anything in dc takes substantial wealth and sophistication. This is a historical anomaly.
But yes, I agree with you. I do think the root causes are in safety-Ism (excessive building codes) and nimbyism (excessive permitting procedures).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These encampments are third world country stuff. How can people mentally convince themselves that allowing them and supporting them is somehow just and right that people who oppose them are evil and bad?
The next logical step is that once the tents get blown down in a winter storm, they get replaced with plywood and sheet metal roofs and on and on. Next thing we know we have a real shantytown.
Actually, a big part of why we have this crises is that inexpensive housing has been outlawed. It used to be if you were poor, you’d build a crappy little house. To even get a building permit to do anything in dc takes substantial wealth and sophistication. This is a historical anomaly.
But yes, I agree with you. I do think the root causes are in safety-Ism (excessive building codes) and nimbyism (excessive permitting procedures).
I cannot believe it, you are pro-third world shantytown!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These encampments are third world country stuff. How can people mentally convince themselves that allowing them and supporting them is somehow just and right that people who oppose them are evil and bad?
The next logical step is that once the tents get blown down in a winter storm, they get replaced with plywood and sheet metal roofs and on and on. Next thing we know we have a real shantytown.
Actually, a big part of why we have this crises is that inexpensive housing has been outlawed. It used to be if you were poor, you’d build a crappy little house. To even get a building permit to do anything in dc takes substantial wealth and sophistication. This is a historical anomaly.
But yes, I agree with you. I do think the root causes are in safety-Ism (excessive building codes) and nimbyism (excessive permitting procedures).
Anonymous wrote:These encampments are third world country stuff. How can people mentally convince themselves that allowing them and supporting them is somehow just and right that people who oppose them are evil and bad?
The next logical step is that once the tents get blown down in a winter storm, they get replaced with plywood and sheet metal roofs and on and on. Next thing we know we have a real shantytown.
Anonymous wrote:I also hope you realize that by welcoming them, giving them money etc you just welcomed in more and more of these folks, leading to the current apocalyptic situation. Of course they will stay and more will come if there are freebies and sappy UMC ladies to take advantage of!
Anonymous wrote:I live in NoMa and I just wanted to say this:
It’s possible to be supportive of unhoused populations and want them to have agency and assistance and not want to criminalize homelessness, and still think some of these encampments are huge public health problems that need to be addressed. The encampment under the M St underpass has gotten so bad in the last two years. It is upsetting simply from the standpoint that no one should live like that. It is virtually unpassable at this point. It smells of ruined and human feces at all times. I have heard advocates say that’s not true but I live here and yes, it is.
We used to walk through the encampment with our kids in our way to Harris Teeter. I don’t believe in shielding them from reality. We sought to be good neighbors and we would say hello, give money if we had it on us, sometimes even come by with blankets in the winter.
We don’t do any of that anymore. The encampment feels dangerous, overcrowded, and diseased to me. I can only assume Covid is prevalent. I have nothing but empathy for the people who live there, some of whom have been our neighbors for years. But watching that area decline has made me firmly in favor of clearing out the encampment as soon as possible.
I don’t understand how this can even be debated. I don’t feel this way about people living on the streets in general, but the conditions in this location are alarming. They benefit no one, including the residents there. The city has proposed alternatives and I think we should do whatever it takes to get the folks there moved to a better location.
Anonymous wrote:I live in NoMa and I just wanted to say this:
It’s possible to be supportive of unhoused populations and want them to have agency and assistance and not want to criminalize homelessness, and still think some of these encampments are huge public health problems that need to be addressed. The encampment under the M St underpass has gotten so bad in the last two years. It is upsetting simply from the standpoint that no one should live like that. It is virtually unpassable at this point. It smells of ruined and human feces at all times. I have heard advocates say that’s not true but I live here and yes, it is.
We used to walk through the encampment with our kids in our way to Harris Teeter. I don’t believe in shielding them from reality. We sought to be good neighbors and we would say hello, give money if we had it on us, sometimes even come by with blankets in the winter.
We don’t do any of that anymore. The encampment feels dangerous, overcrowded, and diseased to me. I can only assume Covid is prevalent. I have nothing but empathy for the people who live there, some of whom have been our neighbors for years. But watching that area decline has made me firmly in favor of clearing out the encampment as soon as possible.
I don’t understand how this can even be debated. I don’t feel this way about people living on the streets in general, but the conditions in this location are alarming. They benefit no one, including the residents there. The city has proposed alternatives and I think we should do whatever it takes to get the folks there moved to a better location.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Move them all to a progressive area like Takoma Park.
This!! Daily bus to Tacoma
Anonymous wrote:Move them all to a progressive area like Takoma Park.