Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 8 year-old needs school. She toughs DL out, but was a happier child and much better learner when she could attend school in-person. She plays outside with friends after school, but that doesn't make up for the fact that she often finds Microsoft Team instruction frustrating and uninspiring. We may have a have a hybrid spot at our DCPS EotP come February - we'll know in a few days.
If there's no DCPS school for her through the spring, and no full-time school into the fall, we plan for one parent to take a break from DC with grandparents in a fairly upscale small New England town in the fall, near to the homes of cousins their age. This is a no brainer because our two children like staying with their grandparents/cousins and don't like learning from home. My in-laws town is offering full-time public school right now, and has since Labor Day. Schools in their town put the odd class on hiatus, after a teacher or student tests positive, but they don't shut down the entire school or school system. The superintendent of schools and the school board have threatened to fire teachers who refuse to teach in person without medical documentation. The arrangement is working, that's New England for you.
She doesn’t need in person you want in person. Easier for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not moving. DCPS DL is going fine for our 3rd grader and 1st grader. 3rd grader is self sufficient. 1st grader just needs some prompts with technology. Both do a couple of hours of virtual tutoring per week with 3 of their friends. The kids love sleeping-in.
We do some targeted outdoor/masked/distanced meet-ups so they get socialization. When I say "targeted" only families that are taking Covid precautions very seriously. Several families we have avoided since early in the pandemic have already gotten Covid, but they pushed the boundaries, seemingly just because they really, really don't like this.
But don't get me wrong -- I can't wait for in-person, so long as it is safe. It just seems like school opening is being forced at the worst time of the pandemic -- highest numbers and vaccine right around the corner. And I hate to say it, but the loudest proponents of "open now" seem to be really, really struggling with their kids being home.
Do you consider the 'targeted' family to be taking COVID precautions very seriously if they are meeting with people (your family)? Not meant as a snarky question, but I woudltn'.
Not a snarky question at all! Thanks for being socially responsible and taking Covid-19 seriously.
Targeted =
1) No outside child care -- nannies, daycare, babysitters.
2) Both parents work from home.
3) Parents don't go to grocery store -- curbside pickup and delivery.
4) Only meet outside for the kids. No indoor stuff. Always masked. No dinners/drinks, just park playdates for the kids.
It's not risk free, but careful, I think.
It’s fine to go grocery shopping. It’s not fine to have play dates.
Says you. She came to a different conclusion. Grocery shopping is indoors. We know indoor activities are much more dangerous than outdoor and as the pandemic drags on it gets harder to keep distance in the grocery as so many people seem to have given up. For me, it’s also a risk/benefit analysis. I can order groceries and I may not get everything I want but I can love with that. I can’t live with my child not having any in person social interaction for a year or longer. So I don’t know that an outdoor playdate is safer than the grocery store but for me the benefit is about 100x what shopping inside is.
Anonymous wrote:My 8 year-old needs school. She toughs DL out, but was a happier child and much better learner when she could attend school in-person. She plays outside with friends after school, but that doesn't make up for the fact that she often finds Microsoft Team instruction frustrating and uninspiring. We may have a have a hybrid spot at our DCPS EotP come February - we'll know in a few days.
If there's no DCPS school for her through the spring, and no full-time school into the fall, we plan for one parent to take a break from DC with grandparents in a fairly upscale small New England town in the fall, near to the homes of cousins their age. This is a no brainer because our two children like staying with their grandparents/cousins and don't like learning from home. My in-laws town is offering full-time public school right now, and has since Labor Day. Schools in their town put the odd class on hiatus, after a teacher or student tests positive, but they don't shut down the entire school or school system. The superintendent of schools and the school board have threatened to fire teachers who refuse to teach in person without medical documentation. The arrangement is working, that's New England for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not moving. DCPS DL is going fine for our 3rd grader and 1st grader. 3rd grader is self sufficient. 1st grader just needs some prompts with technology. Both do a couple of hours of virtual tutoring per week with 3 of their friends. The kids love sleeping-in.
We do some targeted outdoor/masked/distanced meet-ups so they get socialization. When I say "targeted" only families that are taking Covid precautions very seriously. Several families we have avoided since early in the pandemic have already gotten Covid, but they pushed the boundaries, seemingly just because they really, really don't like this.
But don't get me wrong -- I can't wait for in-person, so long as it is safe. It just seems like school opening is being forced at the worst time of the pandemic -- highest numbers and vaccine right around the corner. And I hate to say it, but the loudest proponents of "open now" seem to be really, really struggling with their kids being home.
Do you consider the 'targeted' family to be taking COVID precautions very seriously if they are meeting with people (your family)? Not meant as a snarky question, but I woudltn'.
Not a snarky question at all! Thanks for being socially responsible and taking Covid-19 seriously.
Targeted =
1) No outside child care -- nannies, daycare, babysitters.
2) Both parents work from home.
3) Parents don't go to grocery store -- curbside pickup and delivery.
4) Only meet outside for the kids. No indoor stuff. Always masked. No dinners/drinks, just park playdates for the kids.
It's not risk free, but careful, I think.
It’s fine to go grocery shopping. It’s not fine to have play dates.
Anonymous wrote:My 8 year-old needs school. She toughs DL out, but was a happier child and much better learner when she could attend school in-person. She plays outside with friends after school, but that doesn't make up for the fact that she often finds Microsoft Team instruction frustrating and uninspiring. We may have a have a hybrid spot at our DCPS EotP come February - we'll know in a few days.
If there's no DCPS school for her through the spring, and no full-time school into the fall, we plan for one parent to take a break from DC with grandparents in a fairly upscale small New England town in the fall, near to the homes of cousins their age. This is a no brainer because our two children like staying with their grandparents/cousins and don't like learning from home. My in-laws town is offering full-time public school right now, and has since Labor Day. Schools in their town put the odd class on hiatus, after a teacher or student tests positive, but they don't shut down the entire school or school system. The superintendent of schools and the school board have threatened to fire teachers who refuse to teach in person without medical documentation. The arrangement is working, that's New England for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who takes an hour to grocery shop? I can walk from my house to the store, shop, checkout, and walk back home in under 20 minutes (and do it weekly). There’s no reason you can’t get in and out quickly if you’re prepared with a list and go when it’s not busy.
If you can buy $300+ of groceries and go to and from the store in 20 minutes, you need to be on Guy's grocery games! But all kidding aside, if going to the store is how you want to spend your COVID risk budget, you do you. It's fine.
With the new strains being ultra contagious, going inside places with other people becomes more risky. And I wouldn't focus on the other shoppers in the store (not crowded), but the store employees -- they are around everyone! There's a reason grocery store employees are near the top of the list for vaccination.
If you don't go in the store at all you are reducing risk for the employees and everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:My 8 year-old needs school. She toughs DL out, but was a happier child and much better learner when she could attend school in-person. She plays outside with friends after school, but that doesn't make up for the fact that she often finds Microsoft Team instruction frustrating and uninspiring. We may have a have a hybrid spot at our DCPS EotP come February - we'll know in a few days.
If there's no DCPS school for her through the spring, and no full-time school into the fall, we plan for one parent to take a break from DC with grandparents in a fairly upscale small New England town in the fall, near to the homes of cousins their age. This is a no brainer because our two children like staying with their grandparents/cousins and don't like learning from home. My in-laws town is offering full-time public school right now, and has since Labor Day. Schools in their town put the odd class on hiatus, after a teacher or student tests positive, but they don't shut down the entire school or school system. The superintendent of schools and the school board have threatened to fire teachers who refuse to teach in person without medical documentation. The arrangement is working, that's New England for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.masslive.com/coronavirus/2021/01/523-students-407-staffers-positive-for-covid-in-massachusetts-schools-in-last-week.html
It's a pandemic, some students and staff are going to test positive here and there. But what's the alternative? A generation of poor kids are high risk of depression and other health issues, of failing to gain basic literacy and numeracy skills because they missed a critical window for acquiring them at age 6, 7 or 8? If most private schools can stay open, and most public school students attend at least two days a week all around the country, let's not abandon or responsibility to public elementary school students. Let's innovate and spend to teach the kids in person, however that works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not moving. DCPS DL is going fine for our 3rd grader and 1st grader. 3rd grader is self sufficient. 1st grader just needs some prompts with technology. Both do a couple of hours of virtual tutoring per week with 3 of their friends. The kids love sleeping-in.
We do some targeted outdoor/masked/distanced meet-ups so they get socialization. When I say "targeted" only families that are taking Covid precautions very seriously. Several families we have avoided since early in the pandemic have already gotten Covid, but they pushed the boundaries, seemingly just because they really, really don't like this.
But don't get me wrong -- I can't wait for in-person, so long as it is safe. It just seems like school opening is being forced at the worst time of the pandemic -- highest numbers and vaccine right around the corner. And I hate to say it, but the loudest proponents of "open now" seem to be really, really struggling with their kids being home.
Do you consider the 'targeted' family to be taking COVID precautions very seriously if they are meeting with people (your family)? Not meant as a snarky question, but I woudltn'.
Not a snarky question at all! Thanks for being socially responsible and taking Covid-19 seriously.
Targeted =
1) No outside child care -- nannies, daycare, babysitters.
2) Both parents work from home.
3) Parents don't go to grocery store -- curbside pickup and delivery.
4) Only meet outside for the kids. No indoor stuff. Always masked. No dinners/drinks, just park playdates for the kids.
It's not risk free, but careful, I think.
It’s fine to go grocery shopping. It’s not fine to have play dates.
Different poster. I don't do either, but I must say, grocery deliveries are great, and I see grocery shopping as a really really bad idea, where the upside of getting a pack of butter on sale for $1.99 instead of $2.60 online is dwarfed by the very real risk of getting covid while shopping indoors with a bunch of strangers.
Meanwhile, I have empathy for those families who decide their kids really need an outdoor well-distanced and well-masked playdate with another family whose covid hygiene is as described by PP. The issue becomes that too few families' covid hygiene is actually as described by PP, hence why we don't do playdates.
You do realize that when you order your groceries, somebody else, someone probably more at risk for Covid and its potential consequences than you, still has to go to the store. So while you are protecting yourself, you are putting someone else at risk.
No.
I realize that the big picture consequence is that I am helping keep someone employed and I am letting the store be more of a space for staff to prepare orders thereby minimizing spread.
Instacart and Amazon Fresh staff shop more quickly and more efficiently than I would.
As someone who does all my shopping myself, I can assure you, those shoppers are not efficient at all. They barrell through the aisles, paying no attention to people's personal space, and they don't know what anything on people's lists are, nor where they can be found in the store. They make shopping for everybody else very very stressful.
+1. I have observed the same. The people who think ordering groceries through low-paid workers are helping anyone but themselves are fooling themselves. If anything, they are making grocery stores a riskier place for their neighbors.
Anonymous wrote:1. Since when are 6,7 and 8 critical teaching years? Please point to existing science on that. There isn’t any. Kids lose years of school for a variety of reasons and they can still read as adults.
2. I do think kids learn better in person because of all the other externalities but again my son is learning to read through DL and a lot of YouTube videos.
It’s a pandemic. It’s not a snow storm, it’s not a teachers strike, it’s a pandemic. It’s a pandemic from an airborne disease.
We need to wait until it’s safe. And we are getting closer to that.