Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform.
News flash! I don’t want to teach from home. Most teachers I know don’t want to do this.
50+? I’d like to know how you arrive at that number and how much compensation you think that would equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
Different district, and they made us do this at her beginning. It was a nightmare because there isn’t a separate room for every teacher, teaching assistant, and related service provider to work from. That means only one person can have their microphone on or you get horrible feedback. The wifi at the school is slow, so the video feed was breaking up all the time with everyone on it at once. Because we couldn’t be alone in the rooms we all had to wear masks at all times, and the kids could barely understand what we were saying. Teaching phonics was impossible. People kept coming in and interrupting to ask questions, drop off paperwork, etc. and it was very distracting. They eventually changed the policy. It was an ill advised method of control and did nothing to improve any productivity or student learning.
FCCPS addressed this. They spent thousands on cameras and mounted them in the high school so they say teaching with masks and wifi will not be a problem. They have it all figured out. Like most schools, the ones not teaching classes every day know what is best for teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
Different district, and they made us do this at her beginning. It was a nightmare because there isn’t a separate room for every teacher, teaching assistant, and related service provider to work from. That means only one person can have their microphone on or you get horrible feedback. The wifi at the school is slow, so the video feed was breaking up all the time with everyone on it at once. Because we couldn’t be alone in the rooms we all had to wear masks at all times, and the kids could barely understand what we were saying. Teaching phonics was impossible. People kept coming in and interrupting to ask questions, drop off paperwork, etc. and it was very distracting. They eventually changed the policy. It was an ill advised method of control and did nothing to improve any productivity or student learning.
Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Try reading up on what is happening in Britain. It is a total sh$t show that is headed our way. This seems like an incredibly irresponsible move.
The new variant is in CO now.
“the infected patient was a man in his 20s with no recent travel history who is currently in isolation in Elbert County, a semi-rural area on the outskirts of the greater Denver metropolitan area.“
We are screwed big time.
If he had been in a public school this never would have happened!
![]()
‘Rona dares not enter our hallowed public school buildings.
Even if it was so bold, public schools are impervious to its wiles. It physically cannot spread there. Maybe the whole country should move into a public school long enough to wipe out covid and flatten the curve permanently? Mitigation
Personally I'm impressed by the virus's reading ability. "Oh, crap -- this is a SCHOOL and not another multihour-a-day gathering of people indoors during a pandemic? LOL! I feel so silly. My bad. I'll just move on down the street."
Just like it only affects people standing in restaurants, not the ones sitting down.
Just like many other stupid COVID rules we're all "following".....
Standing in restaurants? I’m not sure what you mean here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Try reading up on what is happening in Britain. It is a total sh$t show that is headed our way. This seems like an incredibly irresponsible move.
The new variant is in CO now.
“the infected patient was a man in his 20s with no recent travel history who is currently in isolation in Elbert County, a semi-rural area on the outskirts of the greater Denver metropolitan area.“
We are screwed big time.
If he had been in a public school this never would have happened!
![]()
‘Rona dares not enter our hallowed public school buildings.
Even if it was so bold, public schools are impervious to its wiles. It physically cannot spread there. Maybe the whole country should move into a public school long enough to wipe out covid and flatten the curve permanently? Mitigation
Personally I'm impressed by the virus's reading ability. "Oh, crap -- this is a SCHOOL and not another multihour-a-day gathering of people indoors during a pandemic? LOL! I feel so silly. My bad. I'll just move on down the street."
Just like it only affects people standing in restaurants, not the ones sitting down.
Just like many other stupid COVID rules we're all "following".....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Try reading up on what is happening in Britain. It is a total sh$t show that is headed our way. This seems like an incredibly irresponsible move.
The new variant is in CO now.
“the infected patient was a man in his 20s with no recent travel history who is currently in isolation in Elbert County, a semi-rural area on the outskirts of the greater Denver metropolitan area.“
We are screwed big time.
If he had been in a public school this never would have happened!
![]()
‘Rona dares not enter our hallowed public school buildings.
Even if it was so bold, public schools are impervious to its wiles. It physically cannot spread there. Maybe the whole country should move into a public school long enough to wipe out covid and flatten the curve permanently? Mitigation
Personally I'm impressed by the virus's reading ability. "Oh, crap -- this is a SCHOOL and not another multihour-a-day gathering of people indoors during a pandemic? LOL! I feel so silly. My bad. I'll just move on down the street."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
To appease the angry, torch waving, entitled parent crowd.
This does nothing to "appease" us parents. We want real education for our kids. How is that so hard for you to understand?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
To appease the angry, torch waving, entitled parent crowd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform.
News flash! I don’t want to teach from home. Most teachers I know don’t want to do this.
50+? I’d like to know how you arrive at that number and how much compensation you think that would equal.
Not the poster who cited 50%, but I will tell you my high school student is getting less than 50% of the subject instructional time she is supposed to be getting. 55 minutes twice a week, when normally it would be 1.5 hours two or three times a week depending on week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform.
News flash! I don’t want to teach from home. Most teachers I know don’t want to do this.
50+? I’d like to know how you arrive at that number and how much compensation you think that would equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform.
News flash! I don’t want to teach from home. Most teachers I know don’t want to do this.
50+? I’d like to know how you arrive at that number and how much compensation you think that would equal.
50% teach
50% babysit
Duh!
Seems overly simplified, but ok. Let’s go with that.
How much did you pay in property taxes last year? Let’s say $7k for example. ~50% goes to the schools so you would expect $1,750 in compensation from the county?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform.
News flash! I don’t want to teach from home. Most teachers I know don’t want to do this.
50+? I’d like to know how you arrive at that number and how much compensation you think that would equal.
50% teach
50% babysit
Duh!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform.
News flash! I don’t want to teach from home. Most teachers I know don’t want to do this.
50+? I’d like to know how you arrive at that number and how much compensation you think that would equal.
Anonymous wrote:teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform.