Anonymous wrote:NP-- I took a business trip at 8 weeks (not my choice, but necessary). My kid wasn't an easy baby, but it didn't go well. I ended up getting crazy clogged ducts because I wasn't a regular pumper and my kid was inconsable. He was up all night and it just wasn't okay. My husband is awesome, he handled it, but I had to cut the trip short (before people jump on me for being anti feminist, my kid went on a hunger strike and had to go to the hospital). The odds of that happening are really low and I'm not mentioning it to scare you, but because you may need a backup plan if things don't go well.
Anonymous wrote:You are doing the right thing, OP. The projection is some of these comments is astounding. Your father needs you now and your husband and baby will get some really great bonding time together. All will be well. Sending good health wishes to your dad (and his caretaker).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd be taking baby with me too. Newborns need antibodies. If your baby has a fever and is <3 months old, they are supposed to go to the NICU. You should not be traveling. The safest way to travel is to at least give baby your antibodies.
What if the baby was exclusively formula-fed?
So I guess I should have just sent my kids to the NICU for the first three months since the were formula fed due to a double mastectomy. Good to know! I'll make sure to let my other friends know.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you women shock me. It's a week. OP will be gone for a week. it's not like she is leaving for a month. Men leave for a week on business trips and no one says anything. Her child needs his dad just as much as he needs his mom. Her husband sounds like a great dad who will be able to handle things for a week. No need to make OP feel bad.
True, but baby is breastfed. That’s the key difference. I wouldn’t leave a breastfed baby for a week. It would mess up my milk supply (pumping is just not the same) and as another PP mentioned, babies at that age greatly benefit from the antibodies in their mother’s beast milk. Now if OP’s baby was exclusively formula-fed, then there wouldn’t be an issue.
Breastfeeding are highly overstated. There are very minimal benefits for a breastfed baby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op doesn’t strike me as genuinely searching for advice.
I absolutely wouldn’t do this, but it doesn’t really matter since it’s not my life or decision.
She's not looking for the kind of advice the dcum ninnies are giving her. YOU'RE GOING TO DIE AND SO WILL YOUR BABY. AND YOUR BABY WILL FORGET WHO YOU ARE AND STOP EATING ALTOGETHER.
You people are absolutely insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have a fall back plan if the caretaker can't come back after the week.
Reading all of this, sounds like baby will be just fine. But back injuries can be fickle and I would have a back up plan of what will happen if a week passes and the caretaker isn't better.
That was going to be my suggestion. A week for a back injury seems a little on the light side.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does he already do with the baby? Does the baby already take a bottle? How many weeks old is the baby? How many days before you go on your trip?
OP here. He is 8 weeks old. He does almost everything. He is on paternity leave still. He feeds, changes, burps, plays, and puts him to sleep. He is combo fed and takes a bottle. I will be gone for a week.
Anonymous wrote:I would have a fall back plan if the caretaker can't come back after the week.
Reading all of this, sounds like baby will be just fine. But back injuries can be fickle and I would have a back up plan of what will happen if a week passes and the caretaker isn't better.
Anonymous wrote:At 8 weeks I would not do this. If YOU needed life-saving surgery I would do it, otherwise no. If somebody is dying, they are going to die. Your baby's life has JUST started. They don't have vaccines, they only have the immunity they got from being inside your baby and maybe if you've been nursing. Somebody else can help with the family emergency. You have to prioritize your newborn.
Sorry. I know this sounds harsh and isn't what you want to hear. But it's absolutely what I would do.
Anonymous wrote:Newborns basically sleep and eat. They’re the easiest age to take care of, provided they aren’t colicky, so I wouldn’t worry about the DH. And I think the posters who are outraged are (perhaps a little hyperbolically) reacting to the nonchalance in OP’s leaving her newborn for a week. Most women wouldn’t be so indifferent (?) to not being with their brand new infant for a week but who knows, maybe the text doesn’t translate emotions well or this is a troll.
Anonymous wrote:Tips for your husband or tips for you emotionally being apart? An 8 week old is basically sleeping, eating or in a bouncy all day. It is actually one of the easiest ages to care for. Can you bring him with you to your fathers?