Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people explain this to me please, I realize I'm being ignorant and probably will trigger the old farts on this forum. But why? Why not adopt? Do you really want to be 60 when your child is 20? 70 at 30? Women who have babies in their 40s really grosses me out.
I understand the economic and cultural differences for waiting to be older, but biologically you are at menopause age.
Nope, I'm 45 and not even in premenopause. Yes, I'll be 62 with a 20 y/o. Birth in general is pretty gross and kind of works the same at 20 and at 40.
I was nowhere close to menopause at age 40.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people explain this to me please, I realize I'm being ignorant and probably will trigger the old farts on this forum. But why? Why not adopt? Do you really want to be 60 when your child is 20? 70 at 30? Women who have babies in their 40s really grosses me out.
I understand the economic and cultural differences for waiting to be older, but biologically you are at menopause age.
Nope, I'm 45 and not even in premenopause. Yes, I'll be 62 with a 20 y/o. Birth in general is pretty gross and kind of works the same at 20 and at 40.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think 55 qualifies as "senior" I think its over 60
There are literally tens of thousands of 40 year old mothers.
I think the cut off is generally considered to be 43/44 for those with normal fertility levels.
But didn't Holly Hunter have her twins at 47 and Geena Davis had her twins at 48
So not only do women of 40 seem highly capable of having healthy pregnancies, births and family lives, but women close to 50 are also capable of having MULTIPLE healthy, to term births and subsequence family lives.
Maybe you need to find something else, perhaps something really rare like a 60 year old giving birth or a 70 year old. I have seen instances of that in the press. I'd better understand minor outrage at that, to be fair.
But outrage at normality?
I think OP might have a mental disorder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people explain this to me please, I realize I'm being ignorant and probably will trigger the old farts on this forum. But why? Why not adopt? Do you really want to be 60 when your child is 20? 70 at 30? Women who have babies in their 40s really grosses me out.
I understand the economic and cultural differences for waiting to be older, but biologically you are at menopause age.
It’s good that you recognize your limitations. Why do you feel the need to spew your ignorance when you know for a fact that you are ignorant? Did you not get enough attention today?
I'm just asking. Besides a handful of reasons I got responses on a) my grammar and a bunch of pearl clutching responses. None of which explain why you chose to have a baby at such an old age.
Well, you got plenty of substantive responses.
Why do you want to know? Why do you care? Why does it gross you out? Do 25-yr-old pregnant women gross you out? Why? Why not?
Just asking.
And you need to look up the meaning of “pearl-clutching”.
I want to know because there seems to be quite a few women in this area who are old with young children.
I care because I'm trying to understand why you would want to have a toddler while "approaching" menopause. Pardon my previous posts that offended users.
It grosses me out because you're old. I get you are offended by that but you can't change your biological clock nor what you look like. You're 55 while your teenager is throwing a temper tantrum because you're taking too long to receive your 10% discount for being a senior?
No, 25 doesn't gross me out because that's an appropriate child rearing age.
Anyone offended by my question just is insecure with themselves for having children later in life.
You sound pretty rigid in your thoughts. Doesn't well when you become "old" at age 40.
Anonymous wrote:We were too busy learning our reading writing and arithmetic.
*YOU'RE*
Anonymous wrote:Can people explain this to me please, I realize I'm being ignorant and probably will trigger the old farts on this forum. But why? Why not adopt? Do you really want to be 60 when your child is 20? 70 at 30? Women who have babies in their 40s really grosses me out.
I understand the economic and cultural differences for waiting to be older, but biologically you are at menopause age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are too young yet to realize that 40 is not old.
40 is middle age and too old to be having babies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people explain this to me please, I realize I'm being ignorant and probably will trigger the old farts on this forum. But why? Why not adopt? Do you really want to be 60 when your child is 20? 70 at 30? Women who have babies in their 40s really grosses me out.
I understand the economic and cultural differences for waiting to be older, but biologically you are at menopause age.
It’s good that you recognize your limitations. Why do you feel the need to spew your ignorance when you know for a fact that you are ignorant? Did you not get enough attention today?
I'm just asking. Besides a handful of reasons I got responses on a) my grammar and a bunch of pearl clutching responses. None of which explain why you chose to have a baby at such an old age.
Well, you got plenty of substantive responses.
Why do you want to know? Why do you care? Why does it gross you out? Do 25-yr-old pregnant women gross you out? Why? Why not?
Just asking.
And you need to look up the meaning of “pearl-clutching”.
I want to know because there seems to be quite a few women in this area who are old with young children.
I care because I'm trying to understand why you would want to have a toddler while "approaching" menopause. Pardon my previous posts that offended users.
It grosses me out because you're old. I get you are offended by that but you can't change your biological clock nor what you look like. You're 55 while your teenager is throwing a temper tantrum because you're taking too long to receive your 10% discount for being a senior?
No, 25 doesn't gross me out because that's an appropriate child rearing age.
Anyone offended by my question just is insecure with themselves for having children later in life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had 3 kids in my 20s without family money. We are doing fine financially now in our 30s and hoping for more kids. Sounds like you were just immature - personally I'm glad because my body bounced right back after each pregnancy and we enjoyed our young youth together.Anonymous wrote:Having babies in your 20’s sucks. Ask me how I know 😓. I have family money and had childcare help from my family and nannies and it still sucked. I feel like I missed out on a lot of my youth. In this day and age, I would never encourage a woman to have kids in her 20’s unless they know for sure they’re ready to forever give up that wonderful feeling of total freedom and lack of responsibility.
No one cares that you’re grossed out btw OP. Why would you even bring that up?
You had 3 kids in your 20’s with no family money and you want to have more? What is your definition of “fine financially?” Must be different from mine or you must live in flyover.