Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McLean is top girls club in NoVa. Teams get better and better as they age.

Until they don’t. Looking at the actual results instead of the standing tells the stories.

Results example from today:

08 VDA vs McLean: 2-1 VDA
06 VDA vs McLean: 3-0 VDA

Lol, you picked the only two age groups where VDA is above McLean in standings. Very selective. Let's see how VDA did against Mclean in the other age groups.

07 VDA v. Mclean 1-4; 2-1
05 VDA v. Mclean 1-3
04 VDA v. Mclean 1-5
03 VDA v. Mclean 2-4, 0-3

You just did the same thing... Left out 4 VDA wins

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was the person that said McLean 06 will beat VDA 06 in the future bc having seen both teams and knowing a good bit about the clubs, I think that is most likely. But as I said VDA is a very good team! But whoever posted the following should really be cautious bc this type of rumor could really cause problems in a team if not true: “VDA 06 is a dead man walking. I’ve seen their players out at our clubs practices as they are looking to move. This is first hand and not hearsay.” Agree whoever said that should say where they’ve seen the players.

See rumors like this all the time. Never true with top teams, this was posted about our McLean 02 team many times, was always BS, a player would go to a winter futsal with another team or a free training and everyone would say players are leaving.

Anonymous wrote:I was the person that said McLean 06 will beat VDA 06 in the future bc having seen both teams and knowing a good bit about the clubs, I think that is most likely. But as I said VDA is a very good team! But whoever posted the following should really be cautious bc this type of rumor could really cause problems in a team if not true: “VDA 06 is a dead man walking. I’ve seen their players out at our clubs practices as they are looking to move. This is first hand and not hearsay.” Agree whoever said that should say where they’ve seen the players.

Anonymous wrote:I was the person that said McLean 06 will beat VDA 06 in the future bc having seen both teams and knowing a good bit about the clubs, I think that is most likely. But as I said VDA is a very good team! But whoever posted the following should really be cautious bc this type of rumor could really cause problems in a team if not true: “VDA 06 is a dead man walking. I’ve seen their players out at our clubs practices as they are looking to move. This is first hand and not hearsay.” Agree whoever said that should say where they’ve seen the players.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is validity to the argument that the new landscape hurts McLean's ability to dominate. Girs have multiple options to play on strong teams w/good coaches. But let's be serious for a moment:

1. MU is a dead man walking.
2. 0Arlington does not have a track record of producing elite DI players.
3. BRYC has produced a select number of DI players but they will suffer from the same dynamics impacting McLean.
4. Loudoun will always lose out to either FCV or McLean.
5. VDA has potential and does not face the same level of competition for players as Loudoun, FCV, McLean and Arlington.

Point #5 here is interesting as the VDA 06G spanked Loudoun twice (plus a third time if you count scrimmage) by combined score of 8-1 and VDA beat McLean twice by combined score of 5-1. Can't make generalizations at all across all age groups. VDA doesn't play FCV or Arlington (DA). So, trash your list and start over if able. I know, I know... 03, 04, 05... blah blah. But, you can't make a statement like #5 and then get destroyed on the point.

Let's not forget that two years ago VDA 06G went to Nationals Championship game in San Diego only to lose to PDA Blue. How often does NOVA clubs go to National Championship games? #trashlist

McLean won a U18 national championship in 2018 and went deep into the playoffs in 2019 I believe.

I thought the 5 stars were for each U-division in last or near last place this year. Good laugh though. I mean, even the USA reached the semi finals of a World Cup in 1930s. Distant past is fun to bring up.

You know the 5 stars on the BRYC logo. They have won 5 national championships. But whose counting?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is validity to the argument that the new landscape hurts McLean's ability to dominate. Girs have multiple options to play on strong teams w/good coaches. But let's be serious for a moment:

1. MU is a dead man walking.
2. 0Arlington does not have a track record of producing elite DI players.
3. BRYC has produced a select number of DI players but they will suffer from the same dynamics impacting McLean.
4. Loudoun will always lose out to either FCV or McLean.
5. VDA has potential and does not face the same level of competition for players as Loudoun, FCV, McLean and Arlington.

Point #5 here is interesting as the VDA 06G spanked Loudoun twice (plus a third time if you count scrimmage) by combined score of 8-1 and VDA beat McLean twice by combined score of 5-1. Can't make generalizations at all across all age groups. VDA doesn't play FCV or Arlington (DA). So, trash your list and start over if able. I know, I know... 03, 04, 05... blah blah. But, you can't make a statement like #5 and then get destroyed on the point.

Let's not forget that two years ago VDA 06G went to Nationals Championship game in San Diego only to lose to PDA Blue. How often does NOVA clubs go to National Championship games? #trashlist

VDA 06 is a dead man walking. I’ve seen their players out at our clubs practices as they are looking to move. This is first hand and not hearsay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is validity to the argument that the new landscape hurts McLean's ability to dominate. Girs have multiple options to play on strong teams w/good coaches. But let's be serious for a moment:

1. MU is a dead man walking.
2. 0Arlington does not have a track record of producing elite DI players.
3. BRYC has produced a select number of DI players but they will suffer from the same dynamics impacting McLean.
4. Loudoun will always lose out to either FCV or McLean.
5. VDA has potential and does not face the same level of competition for players as Loudoun, FCV, McLean and Arlington.

Point #5 here is interesting as the VDA 06G spanked Loudoun twice (plus a third time if you count scrimmage) by combined score of 8-1 and VDA beat McLean twice by combined score of 5-1. Can't make generalizations at all across all age groups. VDA doesn't play FCV or Arlington (DA). So, trash your list and start over if able. I know, I know... 03, 04, 05... blah blah. But, you can't make a statement like #5 and then get destroyed on the point.

Let's not forget that two years ago VDA 06G went to Nationals Championship game in San Diego only to lose to PDA Blue. How often does NOVA clubs go to National Championship games? #trashlist

McLean won a U18 national championship in 2018 and went deep into the playoffs in 2019 I believe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is validity to the argument that the new landscape hurts McLean's ability to dominate. Girs have multiple options to play on strong teams w/good coaches. But let's be serious for a moment:

1. MU is a dead man walking.
2. 0Arlington does not have a track record of producing elite DI players.
3. BRYC has produced a select number of DI players but they will suffer from the same dynamics impacting McLean.
4. Loudoun will always lose out to either FCV or McLean.
5. VDA has potential and does not face the same level of competition for players as Loudoun, FCV, McLean and Arlington.

Point #5 here is interesting as the VDA 06G spanked Loudoun twice (plus a third time if you count scrimmage) by combined score of 8-1 and VDA beat McLean twice by combined score of 5-1. Can't make generalizations at all across all age groups. VDA doesn't play FCV or Arlington (DA). So, trash your list and start over if able. I know, I know... 03, 04, 05... blah blah. But, you can't make a statement like #5 and then get destroyed on the point.

Let's not forget that two years ago VDA 06G went to Nationals Championship game in San Diego only to lose to PDA Blue. How often does NOVA clubs go to National Championship games? #trashlist

VDA 06 is a dead man walking. I’ve seen their players out at our clubs practices as they are looking to move. This is first hand and not hearsay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is validity to the argument that the new landscape hurts McLean's ability to dominate. Girs have multiple options to play on strong teams w/good coaches. But let's be serious for a moment:

1. MU is a dead man walking.
2. 0Arlington does not have a track record of producing elite DI players.
3. BRYC has produced a select number of DI players but they will suffer from the same dynamics impacting McLean.
4. Loudoun will always lose out to either FCV or McLean.
5. VDA has potential and does not face the same level of competition for players as Loudoun, FCV, McLean and Arlington.

Point #5 here is interesting as the VDA 06G spanked Loudoun twice (plus a third time if you count scrimmage) by combined score of 8-1 and VDA beat McLean twice by combined score of 5-1. Can't make generalizations at all across all age groups. VDA doesn't play FCV or Arlington (DA). So, trash your list and start over if able. I know, I know... 03, 04, 05... blah blah. But, you can't make a statement like #5 and then get destroyed on the point.

Let's not forget that two years ago VDA 06G went to Nationals Championship game in San Diego only to lose to PDA Blue. How often does NOVA clubs go to National Championship games? #trashlist

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McLean is top girls club in NoVa. Teams get better and better as they age.

Until they don’t. Looking at the actual results instead of the standing tells the stories.

Results example from today:

08 VDA vs McLean: 2-1 VDA
06 VDA vs McLean: 3-0 VDA

Lol, you picked the only two age groups where VDA is above McLean in standings. Very selective. Let's see how VDA did against Mclean in the other age groups.

07 VDA v. Mclean 1-4; 2-1
05 VDA v. Mclean 1-3
04 VDA v. Mclean 1-5
03 VDA v. Mclean 2-4, 0-3

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McLean is top girls club in NoVa. Teams get better and better as they age.

Until they don’t. Looking at the actual results instead of the standing tells the stories.

Results example from today:

08 VDA vs McLean: 2-1 VDA
06 VDA vs McLean: 3-0 VDA

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is validity to the argument that the new landscape hurts McLean's ability to dominate. Girs have multiple options to play on strong teams w/good coaches. But let's be serious for a moment:

1. MU is a dead man walking.
2. 0Arlington does not have a track record of producing elite DI players.
3. BRYC has produced a select number of DI players but they will suffer from the same dynamics impacting McLean.
4. Loudoun will always lose out to either FCV or McLean.
5. VDA has potential and does not face the same level of competition for players as Loudoun, FCV, McLean and Arlington.

Point #5 here is interesting as the VDA 06G spanked Loudoun twice (plus a third time if you count scrimmage) by combined score of 8-1 and VDA beat McLean twice by combined score of 5-1. Can't make generalizations at all across all age groups. VDA doesn't play FCV or Arlington (DA). So, trash your list and start over if able. I know, I know... 03, 04, 05... blah blah. But, you can't make a statement like #5 and then get destroyed on the point.

Let's not forget that two years ago VDA 06G went to Nationals Championship game in San Diego only to lose to PDA Blue. How often does NOVA clubs go to National Championship games? #trashlist

NP - but PP likely meant #5 to show that VDA doesn’t have to worry about losing players to close geographic competition. Kids can swap between BRYC/Arlington/McLean pretty easily, since they are geographically close. Loudoun lost players to FCV. Who is the closest real competing club for VDA? It would be a long drive.