Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had written about her voice yesterday and agreed with writers on here who suggested the dress was too casual for these hearings. I think the blazer is an improvement.

It's def an improvement - but the overall outfit gives the sense of a work from home day where she tossed a blazer over a t-shirt for a Zoom call.

I dunno. It's better than the Trump hoochie look. She looks pretty earthy like this. It just doesn't seem like what you wear to your mfin Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

Anyway, maybe she just irks me and that's why even her stupid boring normal clothes irk me. There's a touch of Elizabeth Warren style in what she wears - Christian midwesterner, maybe? - and I love it on Warren, so maybe it is that.

This made me laugh, thanks. She irks me too, as do her "stupid, boring, normal clothes."I imagine her perfume would irk me too, "Sanctimonious...by Calvin Klein" And I'm an east coast Catholic so I can say it..plus this has all put me in a bad mood, apologies to the offended.

Sanctimonious...by Calvin Klein

Oh gd I needed that - thank you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think her dresses are ugly. I think her appearance sends a clear message of “I’m not a threatening uppity professional woman. I’m the good kind that’s a mom.”

Do you think her voice is part of this same persona?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She could have at least combed her hair and put on a jacket. This is a hearing for Supreme Court Justice, not Lane Bryant retail manager.

It's raining today. Her hair looks like anyone else's who blow dried / flat ironed and then stepped out into humid air. I'm not going to snark on flyaways; my hair does much worse things in the horrid DC climate.

You both need to invest in better hair products then.

What do you recommend?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had written about her voice yesterday and agreed with writers on here who suggested the dress was too casual for these hearings. I think the blazer is an improvement.

It's def an improvement - but the overall outfit gives the sense of a work from home day where she tossed a blazer over a t-shirt for a Zoom call.

I dunno. It's better than the Trump hoochie look. She looks pretty earthy like this. It just doesn't seem like what you wear to your mfin Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

Anyway, maybe she just irks me and that's why even her stupid boring normal clothes irk me. There's a touch of Elizabeth Warren style in what she wears - Christian midwesterner, maybe? - and I love it on Warren, so maybe it is that.

This made me laugh, thanks. She irks me too, as do her "stupid, boring, normal clothes."I imagine her perfume would irk me too, "Sanctimonious...by Calvin Klein" And I'm an east coast Catholic so I can say it..plus this has all put me in a bad mood, apologies to the offended.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had written about her voice yesterday and agreed with writers on here who suggested the dress was too casual for these hearings. I think the blazer is an improvement.

It's def an improvement - but the overall outfit gives the sense of a work from home day where she tossed a blazer over a t-shirt for a Zoom call.

I dunno. It's better than the Trump hoochie look. She looks pretty earthy like this. It just doesn't seem like what you wear to your mfin Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

Anyway, maybe she just irks me and that's why even her stupid boring normal clothes irk me. There's a touch of Elizabeth Warren style in what she wears - Christian midwesterner, maybe? - and I love it on Warren, so maybe it is that.

Anonymous wrote:I had written about her voice yesterday and agreed with writers on here who suggested the dress was too casual for these hearings. I think the blazer is an improvement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what is this outfit tho



I like her natural look. She looks athletic. But - what is that outfit?!

Some of you have been upset she hasn’t worn a blazer. So here she is in a blazer and a blouse. What’s wrong with it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF. ACB isn’t a politician. She doesn’t need a “voice coach.”

Women are women’s own worst enemies.

That's your opinion and I disagree. Some of us think she would benefit from working with a voice coach. It is not only for politicians btw.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what is this outfit tho



I like her natural look. She looks athletic. But - what is that outfit?!

Some of you have been upset she hasn’t worn a blazer. So here she is in a blazer and a blouse. What’s wrong with it?

She wore a jacket yesterday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah she doesn't have brown hair. Maybe it looks darker underneath without lighting, but overall it's a darker reddish blonde. Not very brown, and not remotely a brunette

My hair is the same color as hers and it’s brown. It’s brown, people.

I think you either need a trip to the eye doctor, or to turn the light up on your screen's display. Otherwise, next thing you know, you'll say she's a POC. Because that ain't no brunette.

you dont know what brunette is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah she doesn't have brown hair. Maybe it looks darker underneath without lighting, but overall it's a darker reddish blonde. Not very brown, and not remotely a brunette

My hair is the same color as hers and it’s brown. It’s brown, people.

I think you either need a trip to the eye doctor, or to turn the light up on your screen's display. Otherwise, next thing you know, you'll say she's a POC. Because that ain't no brunette.

Anonymous wrote:I think it's fine. There are better pictures of it. The colors are complimentary. I haven't seen what the skirt looks like. All 3 days of outfits have been hits, from my perspective. I am honestly a little surprised and would have expected dark suits that would not have stood out in any way. I actually appreciate the relative boldness and nod to style.