Anonymous wrote:Yup, lock in tuition now, save aggressively and compound that interest
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We should be angry at the cost of state schools, not privates. And I know someone will come on here and say “UMD is only $11k” (conveniently ignoring the cost of room and board) which is a ridiculous answer considering
1-Some qualified kids still can’t afford that amount per year in tuition
2-If they are going to live nearby CP, rent costs money
3-Don’t suggest a kid live at home and commute 45+ minutes per day if that is not an option you’d find acceptable for YOUR OWN kid. If that was such an amazing option everyone would do it. You can’t boast the benefits of living in a dorm (and make fun of directional “commuter” schools) and then say that THOSE kids should commute because it’s so great, but but not my kid!
UMD does offer merit based aid to many high achieving students
If I remember the data from the most recent CDS from 2019 of the 4700 freshmen around 1800 got need based aid (Scholarships and grants not loans) averaging $11000 and 1000 got merit based aid averaging $7000. There was a little overlap - 200 students got both need and merit based aid. So in addition to being very reasonably priced, around 2/3 of UMD students get very generous need based and merit aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WHY ARE WE accepting this?????
It’s complete bullshit. Next on agenda: college reform. It’s absolutely immoral.
No, next on agenda is a societal paradigm shift around what jobs even require college. Many jobs now will be obsolete in 20 years anyway.
College has benefits that go beyond just "getting a job." You may not think so but many people do.
Anonymous wrote:We should be angry at the cost of state schools, not privates. And I know someone will come on here and say “UMD is only $11k” (conveniently ignoring the cost of room and board) which is a ridiculous answer considering
1-Some qualified kids still can’t afford that amount per year in tuition
2-If they are going to live nearby CP, rent costs money
3-Don’t suggest a kid live at home and commute 45+ minutes per day if that is not an option you’d find acceptable for YOUR OWN kid. If that was such an amazing option everyone would do it. You can’t boast the benefits of living in a dorm (and make fun of directional “commuter” schools) and then say that THOSE kids should commute because it’s so great, but but not my kid!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WHY ARE WE accepting this?????
It’s complete bullshit. Next on agenda: college reform. It’s absolutely immoral.
No, next on agenda is a societal paradigm shift around what jobs even require college. Many jobs now will be obsolete in 20 years anyway.
Anonymous wrote:WHY ARE WE accepting this?????
It’s complete bullshit. Next on agenda: college reform. It’s absolutely immoral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why people who aren’t millionaires can’t afford to have 3 or 4 kids anymore. You will need well over a million to put them through college alone.
My 3 kids are in their late teens and twenties and I am certainly not a millionaire. I'm pretty sure my husband and I ''afforded" them, if there is a way to know!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why people who aren’t millionaires can’t afford to have 3 or 4 kids anymore. You will need well over a million to put them through college alone.
My 3 kids are in their late teens and twenties and I am certainly not a millionaire. I'm pretty sure my husband and I ''afforded" them, if there is a way to know!
Anonymous wrote:This is why people who aren’t millionaires can’t afford to have 3 or 4 kids anymore. You will need well over a million to put them through college alone.
Anonymous wrote:This is why people who aren’t millionaires can’t afford to have 3 or 4 kids anymore. You will need well over a million to put them through expensive private college that you are rich enough to save for alone.
Anonymous wrote:We should be angry at the cost of state schools, not privates. And I know someone will come on here and say “UMD is only $11k” (conveniently ignoring the cost of room and board) which is a ridiculous answer considering
1-Some qualified kids still can’t afford that amount per year in tuition
2-If they are going to live nearby CP, rent costs money
3-Don’t suggest a kid live at home and commute 45+ minutes per day if that is not an option you’d find acceptable for YOUR OWN kid. If that was such an amazing option everyone would do it. You can’t boast the benefits of living in a dorm (and make fun of directional “commuter” schools) and then say that THOSE kids should commute because it’s so great, but but not my kid!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two points:
1. College tuition soared because the federal government made loans easy to get. The $$ was virtually unlimited, and the colleges found ways to spend it. Now, there’s a whole generation of students who regret their choices, but it’s hard to put that genie (plus all his overpaid college admin friends) back in the bottle.
2. Countries that have free universities have lower college attendance rates than the US, and generally select for college potential at a much younger age than the US. I’m sure this wouldn’t affect any of your special children, but limiting the # of kids that can go to college hurts the upwardly mobile.
Oh, and one more — government-funded college is a huge giveaway to the UMC/rich. It’s an incredibly regressive government program.
Actually, college tuition soared because states drastically cut funding for higher education.
Check out the interactive bar graphs here: https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/state-higher-education-funding-cuts-have-pushed-costs-to-students
As an example, from 2008-2018 Louisiana cut funding per student by more than 54%, and tuition rose 106% in the same time frame. The talking point that "government got involved, and costs went up" is being perpetuated by the very same people who pushed for the funding cuts that actually drove increases in tuition.
Then why did tuition at my private law school soar over the same time period? Was that also the state cutting support?
No. It was the school taking advantage of how much their students could and would borrow.