Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People have been saying he’s gay for a long time now. Rumors have been flying and people would say, “he’s not gay, he’s southern”. If you google, is he gay, you get so many articles for years before this. If true it’s got to be the worst kept “secret”.

So? If it's true, it's his secret. Who are you to say he needs to announce it?

I don't think anyone on this thread has been saying that (haven't read every post, though). The point is that he created a bad situation for himself, when it could have been avoided if he'd come out and established an openly homosexual relationship with someone. The bad situation is the one many others have been in before him, that he won't be able to credibly deny the allegations, but at the same time won't affirm them either. I mean, if he was really good, he'd say: "Yeah, well so what?". But he won't. He's been working his entire life in the closet. That's probably a step too far, even for him.

And of course there’s always this...I don’t recall exactly what happened but I remember reading this post. Did Trump really do that? What a jerk...

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/756514.page


Anonymous



Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Dems stop at nothing these days- what a shame!


Um, your President also doxxed Lindsey Graham.


Including exposing his FrequentShopperz account number at Dress Barn. Nice job, Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People have been saying he’s gay for a long time now. Rumors have been flying and people would say, “he’s not gay, he’s southern”. If you google, is he gay, you get so many articles for years before this. If true it’s got to be the worst kept “secret”.

So? If it's true, it's his secret. Who are you to say he needs to announce it?

I’m no one to say he must announce it. That’s why the post you quoted said nothing of the kind. It would probably be incredibly painful for him to officially come out of the closet. I’m sure everyone that know him well already knows anyway. This situation does prevent him from having a meaningful relationship which is sad. Maybe when he’s ready to retire from politics he can be open about who he is (assuming this is true). But again, I’m no one to say he has to, that’s up to him. It just sounds like a sad life, no one to spend your time with and allegedly hiring prostitutes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is amusing. So far, all these claims about Graham's "destructive LGBT" policies. And yet not one has been cited. I guess it's just easier for lazy people to make claims and hope no one calls them on it.

Wrong. You didn't read the whole thread and you're calling others lazy?

I read the entire thread. Not sure what you're talking about. It's a thread full of lazy, gossipy liberals trying to fan the flames of nasty rumors and innuendo in order to shame a gay man. No facts whatsoever. LAZY.

Why would being gay shame him?

So you are in favor of outing gay people? That's okay with liberals?

I'm not a liberal. But there is a big difference between outing someone and shaming them. You claimed that people on this thread are trying to shame him. Why would hiring sex workers of the same sex shame him? Either there is nothing wrong with this or there is. Which is it?

False dichotomy. Gay people don't owe you an explanation of their preferences. And given that the world is hostile to them, outing them as gay, against their wishes, is a violation. It's called consent.

I'm sorry but there is no legal basis for this "consent." You don't have to get someone's consent to say truthful things about them in public. You seem like you want to ironically throw liberal talking points into this discussion. But you aren't doing it right. And I'm not a liberal so I don't care about vague notions of "consent."

DP. Here's the thing. You have no idea whether ANY of these allegations are truthful - including the claim that he's gay. So right now, all this consists of is slander.

No one on this thread INCLUDING YOU has any idea if the allegations are true or false. It's been less than 24 hours. Let's see if additional allegations come up.

True! Let's meet back here tomorrow and see whether ANY reputable news sources are reporting on this. If they're not, it's because they can smell a farce a million miles away. Have fun dreaming about your non-story!

I'm sure that Fox News churns out well researched stories in 24 hours, but real investigate journalism takes time. Weeks and months.

Yes, you're right. CNN can't manage to report thoroughly researched stories within 24 hours. Even given weeks and months, they still have great difficulty.

I wouldn't know. I don't watch CNN.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You would be 100% wrong. If visiting a prostitute was a disqualifier for a security clearance, we're going to have to shut down the special operations command. The military has a ton of cleared people and it's not exactly a boy scout troop.

You cannot have a Top Secret security clearance if you routinely, knowingly break the law (i.e. prostitutes).

Oh, no. Did anyone tell Bill Clinton that?

+1. Sorry pp, but you obviously don't work anywhere near security clearance adjudications. There are people with clearances with felony convictions. It's about larger patterns and the average moron visiting a sex worker isn't a big concern. No one is going to commit a capital crime to cover that up.

You don't know what you are talking about. You cannot routinely visit sex workers and have a Top Secret security clearance. Please point me to any evidence that says otherwise.

+1. Lindsey Graham has access to the most critical secrets of the United States. And, if the allegations are true, his secrets lie with prostitutes. This could be a national security issue. It needs to be investigated.

This is hilarious. Do you have any idea how absurd you are?
-DP

If he is paying prostitutes for sex and hiding the fact, he is vulnerable to blackmail. This is the classical logic of security clearances. What is absurd about this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is amusing. So far, all these claims about Graham's "destructive LGBT" policies. And yet not one has been cited. I guess it's just easier for lazy people to make claims and hope no one calls them on it.

voted to ban gay adoption.

In 1999, dolt. Obama was against gay marriage until 2012, and probably against gay adoption back in 1999 too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is amusing. So far, all these claims about Graham's "destructive LGBT" policies. And yet not one has been cited. I guess it's just easier for lazy people to make claims and hope no one calls them on it.

Wrong. You didn't read the whole thread and you're calling others lazy?

I read the entire thread. Not sure what you're talking about. It's a thread full of lazy, gossipy liberals trying to fan the flames of nasty rumors and innuendo in order to shame a gay man. No facts whatsoever. LAZY.

Why would being gay shame him?

So you are in favor of outing gay people? That's okay with liberals?

I'm not a liberal. But there is a big difference between outing someone and shaming them. You claimed that people on this thread are trying to shame him. Why would hiring sex workers of the same sex shame him? Either there is nothing wrong with this or there is. Which is it?

False dichotomy. Gay people don't owe you an explanation of their preferences. And given that the world is hostile to them, outing them as gay, against their wishes, is a violation. It's called consent.

I'm sorry but there is no legal basis for this "consent." You don't have to get someone's consent to say truthful things about them in public. You seem like you want to ironically throw liberal talking points into this discussion. But you aren't doing it right. And I'm not a liberal so I don't care about vague notions of "consent."

DP. Here's the thing. You have no idea whether ANY of these allegations are truthful - including the claim that he's gay. So right now, all this consists of is slander.

No one on this thread INCLUDING YOU has any idea if the allegations are true or false. It's been less than 24 hours. Let's see if additional allegations come up.

True! Let's meet back here tomorrow and see whether ANY reputable news sources are reporting on this. If they're not, it's because they can smell a farce a million miles away. Have fun dreaming about your non-story!

I'm sure that Fox News churns out well researched stories in 24 hours, but real investigate journalism takes time. Weeks and months.

Yes, you're right. CNN can't manage to report thoroughly researched stories within 24 hours. Even given weeks and months, they still have great difficulty.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People have been saying he’s gay for a long time now. Rumors have been flying and people would say, “he’s not gay, he’s southern”. If you google, is he gay, you get so many articles for years before this. If true it’s got to be the worst kept “secret”.

So? If it's true, it's his secret. Who are you to say he needs to announce it?

Because prostitution is a crime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You would be 100% wrong. If visiting a prostitute was a disqualifier for a security clearance, we're going to have to shut down the special operations command. The military has a ton of cleared people and it's not exactly a boy scout troop.

You cannot have a Top Secret security clearance if you routinely, knowingly break the law (i.e. prostitutes).

Oh, no. Did anyone tell Bill Clinton that?

+1. Sorry pp, but you obviously don't work anywhere near security clearance adjudications. There are people with clearances with felony convictions. It's about larger patterns and the average moron visiting a sex worker isn't a big concern. No one is going to commit a capital crime to cover that up.

You don't know what you are talking about. You cannot routinely visit sex workers and have a Top Secret security clearance. Please point me to any evidence that says otherwise.

+1. Lindsey Graham has access to the most critical secrets of the United States. And, if the allegations are true, his secrets lie with prostitutes. This could be a national security issue. It needs to be investigated.

This is hilarious. Do you have any idea how absurd you are?
-DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is amusing. So far, all these claims about Graham's "destructive LGBT" policies. And yet not one has been cited. I guess it's just easier for lazy people to make claims and hope no one calls them on it.

Wrong. You didn't read the whole thread and you're calling others lazy?

I read the entire thread. Not sure what you're talking about. It's a thread full of lazy, gossipy liberals trying to fan the flames of nasty rumors and innuendo in order to shame a gay man. No facts whatsoever. LAZY.

Why would being gay shame him?

So you are in favor of outing gay people? That's okay with liberals?

I'm not a liberal. But there is a big difference between outing someone and shaming them. You claimed that people on this thread are trying to shame him. Why would hiring sex workers of the same sex shame him? Either there is nothing wrong with this or there is. Which is it?

False dichotomy. Gay people don't owe you an explanation of their preferences. And given that the world is hostile to them, outing them as gay, against their wishes, is a violation. It's called consent.

I'm sorry but there is no legal basis for this "consent." You don't have to get someone's consent to say truthful things about them in public. You seem like you want to ironically throw liberal talking points into this discussion. But you aren't doing it right. And I'm not a liberal so I don't care about vague notions of "consent."

DP. Here's the thing. You have no idea whether ANY of these allegations are truthful - including the claim that he's gay. So right now, all this consists of is slander.

No one on this thread INCLUDING YOU has any idea if the allegations are true or false. It's been less than 24 hours. Let's see if additional allegations come up.

True! Let's meet back here tomorrow and see whether ANY reputable news sources are reporting on this. If they're not, it's because they can smell a farce a million miles away. Have fun dreaming about your non-story!

I'm sure that Fox News churns out well researched stories in 24 hours, but real investigate journalism takes time. Weeks and months.

Anonymous wrote:This thread is amusing. So far, all these claims about Graham's "destructive LGBT" policies. And yet not one has been cited. I guess it's just easier for lazy people to make claims and hope no one calls them on it.

voted to ban gay adoption.

Anonymous wrote:People have been saying he’s gay for a long time now. Rumors have been flying and people would say, “he’s not gay, he’s southern”. If you google, is he gay, you get so many articles for years before this. If true it’s got to be the worst kept “secret”.

So? If it's true, it's his secret. Who are you to say he needs to announce it?

My southern gay friends refer to him as "miss Lindsey." Nuff said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You would be 100% wrong. If visiting a prostitute was a disqualifier for a security clearance, we're going to have to shut down the special operations command. The military has a ton of cleared people and it's not exactly a boy scout troop.

You cannot have a Top Secret security clearance if you routinely, knowingly break the law (i.e. prostitutes).

Oh, no. Did anyone tell Bill Clinton that?

+1. Sorry pp, but you obviously don't work anywhere near security clearance adjudications. There are people with clearances with felony convictions. It's about larger patterns and the average moron visiting a sex worker isn't a big concern. No one is going to commit a capital crime to cover that up.

You don't know what you are talking about. You cannot routinely visit sex workers and have a Top Secret security clearance. Please point me to any evidence that says otherwise.

+1. Lindsey Graham has access to the most critical secrets of the United States. And, if the allegations are true, his secrets lie with prostitutes. This could be a national security issue. It needs to be investigated.

People have been saying he’s gay for a long time now. Rumors have been flying and people would say, “he’s not gay, he’s southern”. If you google, is he gay, you get so many articles for years before this. If true it’s got to be the worst kept “secret”.