Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They need to get the facts of what happened.
One version is a guy just out for his daily jog who gets hunted down and executed for the sole reason of being black. That is a sensational and emotional story and has spawned a ton of pictures on social media.
The other is a guy acting suspiciously and running away from something who is followed by people who witnessed the suspicious behavior, there is an altercation, and he is killed.
Both are still murder but they are two completely different stories.
Your second possible scenario is not at all correct. Three armed men chased him, caught him, wrestled with him and shot him dead. "There was an altercation" implies you're not sure how it started, or that it just erupted naturally. You know that isn't true, and you're using language to minimize what really happened. I believe that is a form of lying.
Anonymous wrote:They need to get the facts of what happened.
One version is a guy just out for his daily jog who gets hunted down and executed for the sole reason of being black. That is a sensational and emotional story and has spawned a ton of pictures on social media.
The other is a guy acting suspiciously and running away from something who is followed by people who witnessed the suspicious behavior, there is an altercation, and he is killed.
Both are still murder but they are two completely different stories.
Anonymous wrote:They need to get the facts of what happened.
One version is a guy just out for his daily jog who gets hunted down and executed for the sole reason of being black. That is a sensational and emotional story and has spawned a ton of pictures on social media.
The other is a guy acting suspiciously and running away from something who is followed by people who witnessed the suspicious behavior, there is an altercation, and he is killed.
Both are still murder but they are two completely different stories.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did the burglaries and larcenies in the neighborhood continue after this occurred on February 23rd?
If I were to culprit, I definitely wouldn’t return to that neighborhood
There was only 1 burglary in that area from January to Feb 23rd.
CNN reports he's caught on video earlier that same day lurking around a construction site, i.e. trespassing.
"The owner of an under-construction home, who is listed as a victim in the police incident report, said his surveillance system captured at least four short clips of a man who appeared to be Arbery 'coming onto his property' February 23.
The suspect walked by the garage and down to a dock on the Little Satilla River, the motion-triggered cameras show, according to the homeowner. Asked whether they showed the man stealing or committing any other crime, he said they show him 'trespassing'."
So it’s okay to shoot him in the street like a dog?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ahmaud arbery, what was his job or occupation? They keep calling him a jogger but what is his story? Was he a student, did he have a job, did he have kids?
Why do you ask?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did the burglaries and larcenies in the neighborhood continue after this occurred on February 23rd?
If I were to culprit, I definitely wouldn’t return to that neighborhood
There was only 1 burglary in that area from January to Feb 23rd.
CNN reports he's caught on video earlier that same day lurking around a construction site, i.e. trespassing.
"The owner of an under-construction home, who is listed as a victim in the police incident report, said his surveillance system captured at least four short clips of a man who appeared to be Arbery 'coming onto his property' February 23.
The suspect walked by the garage and down to a dock on the Little Satilla River, the motion-triggered cameras show, according to the homeowner. Asked whether they showed the man stealing or committing any other crime, he said they show him 'trespassing'."
Anonymous wrote:You are correct. What do you think will happen when the video is shown to the jurors?Anonymous wrote:These men have a right to a fair trial. Innocent until proven guilty.
Anonymous wrote:You are correct. What do you think will happen when the video is shown to the jurors?Anonymous wrote:These men have a right to a fair trial. Innocent until proven guilty.
You are correct. What do you think will happen when the video is shown to the jurors?Anonymous wrote:These men have a right to a fair trial. Innocent until proven guilty.
Anonymous wrote:They need to get the facts of what happened.
One version is a guy just out for his daily jog who gets hunted down and executed for the sole reason of being black. That is a sensational and emotional story and has spawned a ton of pictures on social media.
The other is a guy acting suspiciously and running away from something who is followed by people who witnessed the suspicious behavior, there is an altercation, and he is killed.
Both are still murder but they are two completely different stories.
Anonymous wrote:These men have a right to a fair trial. Innocent until proven guilty.