Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
The city is just begging to get sued with this. Someone is going to get really sick or die from this, and their family is going to make the city pay.
Cities all over the US and all over the world are doing this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
The city is just begging to get sued with this. Someone is going to get really sick or die from this, and their family is going to make the city pay.
Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
Exactly why we need more protected areas for everybody to be able to walk, run, and bike at appropriate distances.
Or maybe the city shouldnt be herding everyone to the same place, especially when all the streets and sidewalks are already empty.
Yes, more protected areas for everyone, all over the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
Exactly why we need more protected areas for everybody to be able to walk, run, and bike at appropriate distances.
Or maybe the city shouldnt be herding everyone to the same place, especially when all the streets and sidewalks are already empty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
Exactly why we need more protected areas for everybody to be able to walk, run, and bike at appropriate distances.
Anonymous wrote:Great article in today’s Washington Post about how Washingtonians are putting up cones and signs to discourage cut through traffic on residential side streets and open them up as protected walking areas for pedestrians. More residents should do this self-help.
Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
Anonymous wrote:I have a great idea!
Let's have runners who are huffing and puffing go to the same place as old people going for a walk!
What's the worst that could happen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love how this thread has been going on for nine pages, and no one has identified a single street anywhere that is too crowded to walk on.
Any street where there are 2 people walking in opposite directions on the same sidewalk.
Ha! If you think two people is a crowd, you are going to hate Rock Creek Park. It's like every person in DC who wants to get out of their house said to themselves, "I know what I'll do -- I'll go to Rock Creek Park." There is no street that is as crowded as is RCP. And that was before the mayor encouraged people to have a block party there!
And then there’s much angst among the commentariat on why the infection rate is higher among African-Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love how this thread has been going on for nine pages, and no one has identified a single street anywhere that is too crowded to walk on.
Any street where there are 2 people walking in opposite directions on the same sidewalk.
Ha! If you think two people is a crowd, you are going to hate Rock Creek Park. It's like every person in DC who wants to get out of their house said to themselves, "I know what I'll do -- I'll go to Rock Creek Park." There is no street that is as crowded as is RCP. And that was before the mayor encouraged people to have a block party there!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love how this thread has been going on for nine pages, and no one has identified a single street anywhere that is too crowded to walk on.
Any street where there are 2 people walking in opposite directions on the same sidewalk.