Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You aren't very good at the google

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g8oLT_ExmkzP5xd_7TtjxeEEDI73DJNH/view

https://drive.google.com/file/d/13FTKNMDdHqxBdtaV5jaEHVXjSRL3be4o/view

This clearly shows the appalling number of tree removed. As-build plans show hardly any trees on the slopes in the southwest corner of the park, meaning virtually no screenings of the pool complex from the street. There seems to be no plan to have a tree canopy there. Why not ?

Anonymous wrote:You aren't very good at the google

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g8oLT_ExmkzP5xd_7TtjxeEEDI73DJNH/view

https://drive.google.com/file/d/13FTKNMDdHqxBdtaV5jaEHVXjSRL3be4o/view

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covid 19 plus high density plus public transport sounds worrisome

Oh? Is coronavirus is more dangerous for people who live in apartments than for people who live in detached one-household houses?

I don't know. Do you think densely packed cities and only public mass transport options might be? I dunno.

If you're looking to improve public health, more cars is really, really, really not the way to go.

I would think no cars isn't the way either. Probs need reasonable mix.

Who is banning cars? Nobody. But greatly reducing car use in the city would greatly improve public health.

So would preserving and enhancing the city’s tree canopy. But for some unexplained reason, the DC government recently clear-cut about 150 trees in Hearst Park!

You keep posting this. They cut down and removed a bunch of weeds and weed trees that had been there forever. The whole area will be replanted with proper flora and stormwater mitigation plantings. See the plans, they are very nice.

Please post the link to the very nice reforestation plan. We can’t find it.

Link? No, just crickets. Where is the tree replanting plan?

It's on the website. I am sure you can find it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Asthma in DC is related to insect dander, fall keaves and fhat yellow stuff that coats everything in the spring. Im not sure what one would be meant to tell people about cars.

There is a difference between asthma and allergies. What you are describing is allergies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covid 19 plus high density plus public transport sounds worrisome

Oh? Is coronavirus is more dangerous for people who live in apartments than for people who live in detached one-household houses?

I don't know. Do you think densely packed cities and only public mass transport options might be? I dunno.

If you're looking to improve public health, more cars is really, really, really not the way to go.

I would think no cars isn't the way either. Probs need reasonable mix.

Who is banning cars? Nobody. But greatly reducing car use in the city would greatly improve public health.

So would preserving and enhancing the city’s tree canopy. But for some unexplained reason, the DC government recently clear-cut about 150 trees in Hearst Park!

You keep posting this. They cut down and removed a bunch of weeds and weed trees that had been there forever. The whole area will be replanted with proper flora and stormwater mitigation plantings. See the plans, they are very nice.

Please post the link to the very nice reforestation plan. We can’t find it.

Link? No, just crickets. Where is the tree replanting plan?

Anonymous wrote:

Asthma in DC is related to insect dander, fall keaves and fhat yellow stuff that coats everything in the spring. Im not sure what one would be meant to tell people about cars.

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a good argument for more, better, cheaper, safer public transport.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DC has really good air quality. Surprisingly good. Why is this shocking to you? Dont you want to ground your public policy in actual fact?

Tell that to the people who have asthma.

And the people who live next to highways.

And the people who live next to highways who have asthma.

There is only one highway in DC and the Feds won't let the city get rid of it. Support statehood and that can change!

Asthma in DC is related to insect dander, fall keaves and fhat yellow stuff that coats everything in the spring. Im not sure what one would be meant to tell people about cars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covid 19 plus high density plus public transport sounds worrisome

Oh? Is coronavirus is more dangerous for people who live in apartments than for people who live in detached one-household houses?

I don't know. Do you think densely packed cities and only public mass transport options might be? I dunno.

If you're looking to improve public health, more cars is really, really, really not the way to go.

I would think no cars isn't the way either. Probs need reasonable mix.

Who is banning cars? Nobody. But greatly reducing car use in the city would greatly improve public health.

So would preserving and enhancing the city’s tree canopy. But for some unexplained reason, the DC government recently clear-cut about 150 trees in Hearst Park!

You keep posting this. They cut down and removed a bunch of weeds and weed trees that had been there forever. The whole area will be replanted with proper flora and stormwater mitigation plantings. See the plans, they are very nice.

Please post the link to the very nice reforestation plan. We can’t find it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DC has really good air quality. Surprisingly good. Why is this shocking to you? Dont you want to ground your public policy in actual fact?

Tell that to the people who have asthma.

And the people who live next to highways.

And the people who live next to highways who have asthma.

There is only one highway in DC and the Feds won't let the city get rid of it. Support statehood and that can change!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DC has really good air quality. Surprisingly good. Why is this shocking to you? Dont you want to ground your public policy in actual fact?

Tell that to the people who have asthma.

And the people who live next to highways.

And the people who live next to highways who have asthma.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covid 19 plus high density plus public transport sounds worrisome

Oh? Is coronavirus is more dangerous for people who live in apartments than for people who live in detached one-household houses?

I don't know. Do you think densely packed cities and only public mass transport options might be? I dunno.

If you're looking to improve public health, more cars is really, really, really not the way to go.

I would think no cars isn't the way either. Probs need reasonable mix.

Who is banning cars? Nobody. But greatly reducing car use in the city would greatly improve public health.

So would preserving and enhancing the city’s tree canopy. But for some unexplained reason, the DC government recently clear-cut about 150 trees in Hearst Park!

You keep posting this. They cut down and removed a bunch of weeds and weed trees that had been there forever. The whole area will be replanted with proper flora and stormwater mitigation plantings. See the plans, they are very nice.