Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When is all this going to be decided???
Either on time or, knowing Arlington, punted for a couple more years.
One of the SB members (was it Monique?) seemed to be nearly in tears when she said that this decision needs to be made ASAP. I thought she was going to propose that they vote on it then and there.
NVD and TT are sure votes. If they've got MO, it's definitely going to happen. There will not be any punting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When is all this going to be decided???
Either on time or, knowing Arlington, punted for a couple more years.
One of the SB members (was it Monique?) seemed to be nearly in tears when she said that this decision needs to be made ASAP. I thought she was going to propose that they vote on it then and there.
NVD and TT are sure votes. If they've got MO, it's definitely going to happen. There will not be any punting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're at ATS and parking is mostly ok. For big evening events, you have to park on George Mason or at the Safeway. It's 0.75 miles or so away from the Ballston metro, which isn't as close to metro as the current Key, but also isn't tragic. 0.75 miles from metro is better than nearly any other school in the county (or surrounding counties, for that matter.)
ATS can hold at least 4 classes per grade plus VPI. It currently has about that now. Given that only 35 native spanish speakers applied for Key's kindergarten last year, you could do 4 classes per grade and accommodate at least 80 kids per grade, or even 96 per grade (as ATS currently has in most grades) accounting for attrition as kids leave in the later grades (and can't transfer in due to the spanish language requirements.) So I think it could be a good fit once some of the bigger grades transition out.
We're a current ATS family and I worry that McKinley will be a more difficult location for the lower-income families to access, and would be a tougher sell for the South Arlington families in general. But I support the idea of a bigger ATS because, given the waitlist situation, clearly the demand is there for more seats.
won’t you get towed if you park in the Safeway lot? I’m assuming it’s private property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When is all this going to be decided???
Either on time or, knowing Arlington, punted for a couple more years.
One of the SB members (was it Monique?) seemed to be nearly in tears when she said that this decision needs to be made ASAP. I thought she was going to propose that they vote on it then and there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When is all this going to be decided???
Either on time or, knowing Arlington, punted for a couple more years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When is all this going to be decided???
Either on time or, knowing Arlington, punted for a couple more years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The guy with the glasses is one tough interrogator. I feel sorry for the people who have to face him.
No, he’s an idiot. Anyone who understands a boundary process knows you can’t say for sure how many kids will move until the boundaries are done. He’s posturing and being difficult because that’s what he does. But he never actually does anything more than that.
He passed on very specific questions that were clearly posed to him by members of the public.
yeah- he was trying to repeat the Key talking point, which only makes sense to those who are within the Key boundary- that somehow they will still need more seats in the Rosslyn neighborhood so thus the move is pointless. First part true- second part- uh no- it will give them 600 seats- that's a good start.
I continue to be baffled by this argument. “We can’t fix everything completely right now, so let’s make things even worse instead.” Huh?
Can anyone from Key explain how their magical alternative proposal creates more seats in the R-B corridor than adding a whole school worth of neighborhood seats? I don’t understand where they think these seats are coming from. Are they really just pretending like pushing Long Branch kids west and filling those with kids from Courthouse is creating more seats than moving immersion and filling Long Branch AND Key with neighborhood seats?
Saw at ASFS they are having music classes outside due to lack of space - something needs to be changed soon. https://twitter.com/ASFSOnline
Anonymous wrote:When is all this going to be decided???
Anonymous wrote:We're at ATS and parking is mostly ok. For big evening events, you have to park on George Mason or at the Safeway. It's 0.75 miles or so away from the Ballston metro, which isn't as close to metro as the current Key, but also isn't tragic. 0.75 miles from metro is better than nearly any other school in the county (or surrounding counties, for that matter.)
ATS can hold at least 4 classes per grade plus VPI. It currently has about that now. Given that only 35 native spanish speakers applied for Key's kindergarten last year, you could do 4 classes per grade and accommodate at least 80 kids per grade, or even 96 per grade (as ATS currently has in most grades) accounting for attrition as kids leave in the later grades (and can't transfer in due to the spanish language requirements.) So I think it could be a good fit once some of the bigger grades transition out.
We're a current ATS family and I worry that McKinley will be a more difficult location for the lower-income families to access, and would be a tougher sell for the South Arlington families in general. But I support the idea of a bigger ATS because, given the waitlist situation, clearly the demand is there for more seats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Can anyone from Key explain how their magical alternative proposal creates more seats in the R-B corridor than adding a whole school worth of neighborhood seats? I don’t understand where they think these seats are coming from. Are they really just pretending like pushing Long Branch kids west and filling those with kids from Courthouse is creating more seats than moving immersion and filling Long Branch AND Key with neighborhood seats?[
Can someone please share this proposal?
Yes, please?
I think this is it?
https://imgur.com/a/NG3h5b7
Oh that is the funniest thing I've seen all day. LOL!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Can anyone from Key explain how their magical alternative proposal creates more seats in the R-B corridor than adding a whole school worth of neighborhood seats? I don’t understand where they think these seats are coming from. Are they really just pretending like pushing Long Branch kids west and filling those with kids from Courthouse is creating more seats than moving immersion and filling Long Branch AND Key with neighborhood seats?[
Can someone please share this proposal?
Yes, please?
I think this is it?
https://imgur.com/a/NG3h5b7
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Can anyone from Key explain how their magical alternative proposal creates more seats in the R-B corridor than adding a whole school worth of neighborhood seats? I don’t understand where they think these seats are coming from. Are they really just pretending like pushing Long Branch kids west and filling those with kids from Courthouse is creating more seats than moving immersion and filling Long Branch AND Key with neighborhood seats?[
Can someone please share this proposal?
Yes, please?
I think this is it?
https://imgur.com/a/NG3h5b7
Anonymous wrote:
Can anyone from Key explain how their magical alternative proposal creates more seats in the R-B corridor than adding a whole school worth of neighborhood seats? I don’t understand where they think these seats are coming from. Are they really just pretending like pushing Long Branch kids west and filling those with kids from Courthouse is creating more seats than moving immersion and filling Long Branch AND Key with neighborhood seats?[
Can someone please share this proposal?
Yes, please?